Quality of YouTube™ videos on the clinical use of silver fluoride.

IF 2
S Zafar, K YongHong Low, W Yi Teh, S Hong Chan, L J Walsh
{"title":"Quality of YouTube™ videos on the clinical use of silver fluoride.","authors":"S Zafar, K YongHong Low, W Yi Teh, S Hong Chan, L J Walsh","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01102-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silver fluoride (SF) is an effective, minimally invasive dental caries treatment, but the quality, reliability, and adherence to manufacturers' instructions for use (IFU) in YouTube™ videos on SF usage remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos on the clinical usage of SF and assess their adherence to their IFU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of 78 YouTube™ videos was conducted. Reliability was assessed with modified DISCERN tool, source quality with Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, production quality with Audio-Visual Quality tool, and content usefulness with Total Content Evaluation index. Adherence to clinical instructions was assessed with IFU Adherence Evaluation tool. Correlations between video characteristics and engagement metrics were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Videos had moderately high reliability (median mDISCERN score: 4 and IQR: 3-4) and usefulness (median TCE score: 5 and IQR: 4-6), but source quality was lower (median JAMA score: 2 and IQR: 2-3). Adherence to IFU varied between SF brands, with videos demonstrating at least 60% of steps. Dental professionals were the most frequent video producers, but no significant quality differences were observed between sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube™ offers potential as a learning resource for SF usage, although stricter guidelines are needed to ensure accurate information is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01102-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Silver fluoride (SF) is an effective, minimally invasive dental caries treatment, but the quality, reliability, and adherence to manufacturers' instructions for use (IFU) in YouTube™ videos on SF usage remain uncertain.

Aim: To evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos on the clinical usage of SF and assess their adherence to their IFU.

Design: A cross-sectional analysis of 78 YouTube™ videos was conducted. Reliability was assessed with modified DISCERN tool, source quality with Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, production quality with Audio-Visual Quality tool, and content usefulness with Total Content Evaluation index. Adherence to clinical instructions was assessed with IFU Adherence Evaluation tool. Correlations between video characteristics and engagement metrics were analysed.

Results: Videos had moderately high reliability (median mDISCERN score: 4 and IQR: 3-4) and usefulness (median TCE score: 5 and IQR: 4-6), but source quality was lower (median JAMA score: 2 and IQR: 2-3). Adherence to IFU varied between SF brands, with videos demonstrating at least 60% of steps. Dental professionals were the most frequent video producers, but no significant quality differences were observed between sources.

Conclusion: YouTube™ offers potential as a learning resource for SF usage, although stricter guidelines are needed to ensure accurate information is provided.

关于氟化银临床使用的YouTube™视频的质量。
背景:氟化银(SF)是一种有效的微创龋牙治疗方法,但在YouTube™关于氟化银使用的视频中,其质量、可靠性和对制造商使用说明书(IFU)的遵守程度仍不确定。目的:评估YouTube™视频中SF临床应用的可靠性和质量,并评估他们对IFU的依从性。设计:对78个YouTube™视频进行了横断面分析。可靠性评估采用改良的DISCERN工具,来源质量评估采用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准,制作质量评估采用视听质量工具,内容有用性评估采用总内容评价指数。使用IFU依从性评估工具评估临床指导的依从性。分析了视频特征和用户粘性指标之间的相关性。结果:视频具有中等高的可靠性(mDISCERN评分中位数:4,IQR: 3-4)和有用性(TCE评分中位数:5,IQR: 4-6),但源质量较低(JAMA评分中位数:2,IQR: 2-3)。顺丰各品牌对IFU的坚持程度各不相同,视频中至少有60%的步数。牙科专业人员是最常见的视频制作人,但在来源之间没有观察到显著的质量差异。结论:YouTube™为SF的使用提供了潜在的学习资源,尽管需要更严格的指导来确保提供准确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信