A retrospective study of the impact of comorbidity, polypharmacy and demographic factors on patient inclusion and healthcare delivery in phase I oncology trials.

Hoda Nemat, Martin Orr, Lucy Barrow, Bindu Raobaikady, Sheila Matharu, Lisa Scerri, Udai Banerji, Ceire Costelloe
{"title":"A retrospective study of the impact of comorbidity, polypharmacy and demographic factors on patient inclusion and healthcare delivery in phase I oncology trials.","authors":"Hoda Nemat, Martin Orr, Lucy Barrow, Bindu Raobaikady, Sheila Matharu, Lisa Scerri, Udai Banerji, Ceire Costelloe","doi":"10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phase I trials include patients with metastatic cancer and complex health conditions. Understanding baseline comorbidity and demographic features is critical to improving trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic patient records to study the association of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and demographic factors on trial recruitment, time on trial, and health service utilisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 1671 patients was considered for allocation to a phase I study, of whom 518 patients were recruited to a phase I study and 1153 patients were not. A multivariable analysis revealed polypharmacy was associated with lower recruitment to phase I trials with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01), and a greater number of emergency admissions with a risk ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01). Interestingly, comorbidity was not associated with lower recruitment but was associated with a lower time on trial with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p ≤ 0.001). Demographic factors, including ethnicity, distance of residence from the hospital, and index of multiple deprivation, did not significantly influence these parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy and comorbidity should be considered both in the design of phase I oncology trials and in planning for healthcare utilisation during these trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":519964,"journal":{"name":"BJC reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJC reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phase I trials include patients with metastatic cancer and complex health conditions. Understanding baseline comorbidity and demographic features is critical to improving trial design.

Methods: We used electronic patient records to study the association of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and demographic factors on trial recruitment, time on trial, and health service utilisation.

Results: A cohort of 1671 patients was considered for allocation to a phase I study, of whom 518 patients were recruited to a phase I study and 1153 patients were not. A multivariable analysis revealed polypharmacy was associated with lower recruitment to phase I trials with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01), and a greater number of emergency admissions with a risk ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01). Interestingly, comorbidity was not associated with lower recruitment but was associated with a lower time on trial with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p ≤ 0.001). Demographic factors, including ethnicity, distance of residence from the hospital, and index of multiple deprivation, did not significantly influence these parameters.

Conclusion: Polypharmacy and comorbidity should be considered both in the design of phase I oncology trials and in planning for healthcare utilisation during these trials.

Abstract Image

回顾性研究合并症、多种药物和人口统计学因素对I期肿瘤试验患者纳入和医疗服务的影响。
背景:I期试验包括转移性癌症和复杂健康状况的患者。了解基线合并症和人口统计学特征对改进试验设计至关重要。方法:我们使用电子病历研究合并症、多种用药和人口统计学因素与试验招募、试验时间和卫生服务利用的关系。结果:1671例患者被考虑分配到I期研究,其中518例患者被招募到I期研究,1153例患者未被招募。一项多变量分析显示,多药与较低的I期试验招募率相关,比值比为0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01),与较多的急诊入院率相关,风险比为1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01)。有趣的是,合并症与较低的招募率无关,但与较短的试验时间相关,风险比为0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p≤0.001)。人口因素,包括种族、居住地与医院的距离和多重剥夺指数,对这些参数没有显著影响。结论:在I期肿瘤学试验的设计和这些试验期间的医疗保健利用计划中,应考虑多种药物和合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信