Lisa R Miller-Matero, Celeste Pappas, Brittany Christopher, Roman Grossi, Alyssa Vanderziel, Nancy P Barnett, Roland S Moore, Aaron Hamann, Arthur M Carlin, Oliver A Varban, Jordan M Braciszewski
{"title":"A technology-based intervention to reduce alcohol use after metabolic and bariatric surgery: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes.","authors":"Lisa R Miller-Matero, Celeste Pappas, Brittany Christopher, Roman Grossi, Alyssa Vanderziel, Nancy P Barnett, Roland S Moore, Aaron Hamann, Arthur M Carlin, Oliver A Varban, Jordan M Braciszewski","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are at increased risk for an alcohol use disorder. A technology-based intervention, rooted in motivational interviewing, could broadly reach patients after MBS and has the potential to reduce alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a technology-based intervention to reduce alcohol use delivered after MBS.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 60) who were 3-18 months post-MBS were randomized to the intervention or treatment-as-usual control group. The tailored intervention consisted of 2 (15-minute) sessions of interactive web-based content followed by 3-months of daily text messaging. Participants completed baseline and a postintervention assessment (91.7% retention).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were primarily female (90%), White (55.0%) or Black (43.3%), with a mean age of 44.6 years (SD = 10.4). Of those randomized to the intervention (n = 24), 83.3% (n = 20) began the intervention and 95% (n = 19) completed it. The majority of participants rated all intervention components positively and 100% agreed that other patients would use the intervention. The intervention group reported a significant increase in level of motivation to avoid alcohol use from baseline to postintervention (P = .02), whereas the control group did not show a significant change (P = .73). At the postintervention, the intervention group had significantly fewer participants endorsing alcohol use than the control group (43.5% versus 75%; X<sup>2</sup> = 5.63, P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A technology-based intervention delivered after MBS was feasible, acceptable, and showed promising preliminary outcomes for increasing motivation to avoid alcohol use as well as reducing alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are at increased risk for an alcohol use disorder. A technology-based intervention, rooted in motivational interviewing, could broadly reach patients after MBS and has the potential to reduce alcohol use.
Objective: Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a technology-based intervention to reduce alcohol use delivered after MBS.
Setting: Health system.
Methods: Participants (N = 60) who were 3-18 months post-MBS were randomized to the intervention or treatment-as-usual control group. The tailored intervention consisted of 2 (15-minute) sessions of interactive web-based content followed by 3-months of daily text messaging. Participants completed baseline and a postintervention assessment (91.7% retention).
Results: Participants were primarily female (90%), White (55.0%) or Black (43.3%), with a mean age of 44.6 years (SD = 10.4). Of those randomized to the intervention (n = 24), 83.3% (n = 20) began the intervention and 95% (n = 19) completed it. The majority of participants rated all intervention components positively and 100% agreed that other patients would use the intervention. The intervention group reported a significant increase in level of motivation to avoid alcohol use from baseline to postintervention (P = .02), whereas the control group did not show a significant change (P = .73). At the postintervention, the intervention group had significantly fewer participants endorsing alcohol use than the control group (43.5% versus 75%; X2 = 5.63, P = .02).
Conclusion: A technology-based intervention delivered after MBS was feasible, acceptable, and showed promising preliminary outcomes for increasing motivation to avoid alcohol use as well as reducing alcohol use.