Using Time-Weighted Averages of Total Daily Energy Expenditure to Estimate Energy Intake During a Weight Loss Intervention.

Matthew J Breit, Zhaoxing Pan, Danielle M Ostendorf, Jared H Dahle, Victoria A Catenacci, Seth A Creasy, Edward L Melanson
{"title":"Using Time-Weighted Averages of Total Daily Energy Expenditure to Estimate Energy Intake During a Weight Loss Intervention.","authors":"Matthew J Breit, Zhaoxing Pan, Danielle M Ostendorf, Jared H Dahle, Victoria A Catenacci, Seth A Creasy, Edward L Melanson","doi":"10.1002/oby.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The doubly labeled water (DLW) intake-balance method estimates energy intake (EI) during weight loss using the time-weighted average of total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and changes in body energy stores. Because TDEE declines rapidly during the early phase of weight loss, an early additional measurement is recommended. This study aimed to develop regression models that estimate time-weighted TDEE using fewer interim measurements and determine if EI accuracy is maintained during a 12-month weight loss intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a behavioral weight loss intervention (Dietary Caloric Restriction versus intermittent Fasting Trial, \"DRIFT\") were used. TDEE, body weight, and body composition were measured at months 0, 1, 6, and 12. Regression models using only two or three time points were used to estimate time-weighted TDEE at months 6 and 12, respectively. Models were validated using bootstrap sampling, and time-weighted TDEE and percent caloric restriction (% CR) were compared to a reference approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Models demonstrated strong predictive performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.911-0.982). Limits of agreement with the reference model were 121.1-274.5 kcal/day for TDEE and 4.5%-10.3% for % CR, without significant bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a regression modeling approach, we demonstrate the DLW intake-balance method maintains accuracy during weight loss without early-phase TDEE measurements.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03411356.</p>","PeriodicalId":94163,"journal":{"name":"Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The doubly labeled water (DLW) intake-balance method estimates energy intake (EI) during weight loss using the time-weighted average of total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and changes in body energy stores. Because TDEE declines rapidly during the early phase of weight loss, an early additional measurement is recommended. This study aimed to develop regression models that estimate time-weighted TDEE using fewer interim measurements and determine if EI accuracy is maintained during a 12-month weight loss intervention.

Methods: Data from a behavioral weight loss intervention (Dietary Caloric Restriction versus intermittent Fasting Trial, "DRIFT") were used. TDEE, body weight, and body composition were measured at months 0, 1, 6, and 12. Regression models using only two or three time points were used to estimate time-weighted TDEE at months 6 and 12, respectively. Models were validated using bootstrap sampling, and time-weighted TDEE and percent caloric restriction (% CR) were compared to a reference approach.

Results: Models demonstrated strong predictive performance (R2 = 0.911-0.982). Limits of agreement with the reference model were 121.1-274.5 kcal/day for TDEE and 4.5%-10.3% for % CR, without significant bias.

Conclusions: Using a regression modeling approach, we demonstrate the DLW intake-balance method maintains accuracy during weight loss without early-phase TDEE measurements.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03411356.

使用每日总能量消耗的时间加权平均值来估计减肥干预期间的能量摄入。
目的:双标签水(DLW)摄入平衡法使用每日总能量消耗(TDEE)的时间加权平均值和身体能量储存的变化来估计减肥期间的能量摄入(EI)。由于TDEE在减肥初期迅速下降,建议尽早进行额外测量。本研究旨在建立回归模型,使用较少的中期测量来估计时间加权TDEE,并确定EI在12个月的减肥干预期间是否保持准确性。方法:使用行为减肥干预(饮食热量限制与间歇性禁食试验,“DRIFT”)的数据。在第0、1、6和12个月测量TDEE、体重和体成分。仅使用两个或三个时间点的回归模型分别用于估计第6个月和第12个月的时间加权TDEE。采用自举抽样验证模型,并将时间加权TDEE和卡路里限制百分比(% CR)与参考方法进行比较。结果:模型具有较强的预测能力(R2 = 0.911-0.982)。TDEE与参考模型的一致性限为121.1-274.5千卡/天,% CR为4.5%-10.3%,无显著偏差。结论:使用回归建模方法,我们证明DLW摄入平衡法在没有早期TDEE测量的情况下保持减肥的准确性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03411356。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信