Relationship Between [18F]FDG PET/CT Texture Analysis and Progression-Free Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

IF 1.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Ogün Bülbül, Hande Melike Bülbül, Sibel Göksel
{"title":"Relationship Between [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT Texture Analysis and Progression-Free Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Invasive Breast Carcinoma.","authors":"Ogün Bülbül, Hande Melike Bülbül, Sibel Göksel","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-5-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Texture analysis provides crucial prognostic information about many types of cancer, including breast cancer. The aim was to examine the relationship between texture features (TFs) of 2-deoxy-2[<sup>18</sup>F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography and disease progression in patients with invasive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>TFs of the primary malignant lesion were extracted from PET images of 112 patients. TFs that showed significant differences between patients who achieved one-, three-, and five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and those who did not were selected and subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method to reduce features and prevent overfitting. Machine learning (ML) was used to predict PFS using TFs and selected clinicopathological parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In models using only TFs, random forest predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.730, 0.758, and 0.797, respectively. Naive Bayes predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with AUC values of 0.857, 0.804, and 0.843, respectively. The neural network predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with AUC values of 0.782, 0.828, and 0.780, respectively. These findings indicated increased AUC values when the models combined TFs with clinicopathological parameters. The lowest AUC values of the models combining TFs and clinicopathological parameters when predicting one-year, three-year, and five-year PFS were 0.867, 0.898, and 0.867, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML models incorporating PET-derived TFs and clinical parameters may assist in predicting progression during the pre-treatment period in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":" ","pages":"356-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-5-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Texture analysis provides crucial prognostic information about many types of cancer, including breast cancer. The aim was to examine the relationship between texture features (TFs) of 2-deoxy-2[18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography and disease progression in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Materials and methods: TFs of the primary malignant lesion were extracted from PET images of 112 patients. TFs that showed significant differences between patients who achieved one-, three-, and five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and those who did not were selected and subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method to reduce features and prevent overfitting. Machine learning (ML) was used to predict PFS using TFs and selected clinicopathological parameters.

Results: In models using only TFs, random forest predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.730, 0.758, and 0.797, respectively. Naive Bayes predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with AUC values of 0.857, 0.804, and 0.843, respectively. The neural network predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with AUC values of 0.782, 0.828, and 0.780, respectively. These findings indicated increased AUC values when the models combined TFs with clinicopathological parameters. The lowest AUC values of the models combining TFs and clinicopathological parameters when predicting one-year, three-year, and five-year PFS were 0.867, 0.898, and 0.867, respectively.

Conclusion: ML models incorporating PET-derived TFs and clinical parameters may assist in predicting progression during the pre-treatment period in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[18F]浸润性乳腺癌患者FDG PET/CT结构分析与无进展生存期的关系
目的:乳腺癌是最常见的癌症,也是妇女癌症相关死亡的主要原因。纹理分析为包括乳腺癌在内的许多类型的癌症提供了重要的预后信息。目的是研究浸润性乳腺癌患者2-脱氧-2[18F]氟-d -葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描的结构特征(TFs)与疾病进展之间的关系。材料与方法:从112例患者的PET图像中提取原发恶性病变的tf。选择在达到1年、3年和5年无进展生存期(PFS)的患者与未达到PFS的患者之间显示显着差异的tf,并进行最小的绝对收缩和选择算子回归方法,以减少特征并防止过拟合。使用机器学习(ML)根据TFs和选定的临床病理参数预测PFS。结果:在仅使用TFs的模型中,随机森林预测1年、3年和5年PFS的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.730、0.758和0.797。朴素贝叶斯预测1年、3年和5年PFS的AUC分别为0.857、0.804和0.843。神经网络预测1年、3年和5年PFS的AUC值分别为0.782、0.828和0.780。这些结果表明,当模型将tf与临床病理参数结合时,AUC值增加。结合TFs和临床病理参数的模型预测1年、3年和5年PFS的最低AUC值分别为0.867、0.898和0.867。结论:结合pet衍生的tf和临床参数的ML模型可能有助于预测浸润性乳腺癌患者治疗前的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信