Laboratory Identification of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) Using Different Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Assays.

Bárbara G Barion, Bianca Stefanello, Maria Luiza S A de Paula, Thaís S Saraiva, Paula R Villaça, Vanderson Rocha, Fernanda A Orsi, Tania R F da Rocha
{"title":"Laboratory Identification of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) Using Different Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Assays.","authors":"Bárbara G Barion, Bianca Stefanello, Maria Luiza S A de Paula, Thaís S Saraiva, Paula R Villaça, Vanderson Rocha, Fernanda A Orsi, Tania R F da Rocha","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) guidelines suggest a three-step evaluation for the detection of lupus anticoagulant (LA), including screening, mixing, and confirmation. According to the guidelines, the LA assay based on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) should include an initial screening step followed by a confirmatory step that uses a higher concentration of phospholipids in either bilayer or hexagonal form. For the activator, the guidelines recommend using silica, though ellagic acid is also an option. In this context, HemosIL Silica Clotting Time (SCT, Instrumentation Laboratory) is the only assay that fully complies with the guidelines. However, there are other assays available using different reagents, such as Dade Actin FSL/FS (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) and PTT-LA/Staclot LA (Diagnostica Stago), and the relevance of these differences in LA detection is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared the performance of the three platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 136 samples, the majority were from females (82%) with a median age of 41 years (IQR 32-50); 44 (32%) had a history of thrombosis, and 28 (21%) were on anticoagulants. PTT-LA/Staclot LA had the highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%). There was an almost perfect agreement between PTT-LA/Staclot LA and Dade Actin FSL/FS (kappa 0.812). HemosIL SCT sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 74%, which was increased to 99% by increasing the phospholipid concentration of the screening step.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a good agreement between PTT-LA/Staclot LA and Dade Actin FSL/FS, and fair to moderate agreement with HemosIL SCT, whose performance improved with increasing phospholipid concentration. These results demonstrate that all three assays are comparable for APTT-LA detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) guidelines suggest a three-step evaluation for the detection of lupus anticoagulant (LA), including screening, mixing, and confirmation. According to the guidelines, the LA assay based on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) should include an initial screening step followed by a confirmatory step that uses a higher concentration of phospholipids in either bilayer or hexagonal form. For the activator, the guidelines recommend using silica, though ellagic acid is also an option. In this context, HemosIL Silica Clotting Time (SCT, Instrumentation Laboratory) is the only assay that fully complies with the guidelines. However, there are other assays available using different reagents, such as Dade Actin FSL/FS (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) and PTT-LA/Staclot LA (Diagnostica Stago), and the relevance of these differences in LA detection is not known.

Methods: This study compared the performance of the three platforms.

Results: Out of 136 samples, the majority were from females (82%) with a median age of 41 years (IQR 32-50); 44 (32%) had a history of thrombosis, and 28 (21%) were on anticoagulants. PTT-LA/Staclot LA had the highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%). There was an almost perfect agreement between PTT-LA/Staclot LA and Dade Actin FSL/FS (kappa 0.812). HemosIL SCT sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 74%, which was increased to 99% by increasing the phospholipid concentration of the screening step.

Conclusion: We observed a good agreement between PTT-LA/Staclot LA and Dade Actin FSL/FS, and fair to moderate agreement with HemosIL SCT, whose performance improved with increasing phospholipid concentration. These results demonstrate that all three assays are comparable for APTT-LA detection.

使用不同的活化部分凝血酶活时间(APTT)测定狼疮抗凝剂(LA)的实验室鉴定。
简介:国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)指南建议对狼疮抗凝剂(LA)的检测进行三步评估,包括筛选、混合和确认。根据指南,基于活化的部分凝血活素时间(APTT)的LA测定应包括一个初始筛选步骤,然后是一个确认步骤,该步骤使用更高浓度的磷脂在双层或六边形形式。对于活化剂,指南建议使用二氧化硅,尽管鞣花酸也是一种选择。在这种情况下,haemsil二氧化硅凝血时间(SCT,仪器实验室)是唯一完全符合指南的测定方法。然而,还有其他可用的检测方法,使用不同的试剂,如Dade Actin FSL/FS (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics)和PTT-LA/Staclot LA (Diagnostica Stago),这些差异在LA检测中的相关性尚不清楚。方法:本研究比较了三种平台的性能。结果:136例样本中,大多数为女性(82%),中位年龄41岁(IQR 32-50);44例(32%)有血栓形成史,28例(21%)使用抗凝药物。PTT-LA/Staclot LA具有最高的灵敏度(100%)和特异性(100%)。PTT-LA/Staclot LA与Dade Actin FSL/FS几乎完全吻合(kappa 0.812)。haemsil SCT敏感性为100%,特异性为74%,通过增加筛选步骤的磷脂浓度,特异性可提高到99%。结论:我们观察到PTT-LA/Staclot LA与Dade Actin FSL/FS具有良好的一致性,与hematsil SCT具有中等到中等的一致性,其性能随着磷脂浓度的增加而改善。这些结果表明,这三种检测方法对APTT-LA检测具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信