Practice Patterns and Technology Readiness for Sulcus Tube Placement: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society Membership.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S532710
Anya Rahman, Jordan Whitney, Nadine Abdeljabbar, Aaron D Webel
{"title":"Practice Patterns and Technology Readiness for Sulcus Tube Placement: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society Membership.","authors":"Anya Rahman, Jordan Whitney, Nadine Abdeljabbar, Aaron D Webel","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S532710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate glaucoma surgeons' practice patterns regarding glaucoma drainage device (GDD) tube shunt placement, assess their opinions on sulcus tube placement, and evaluate their receptiveness to technologies designed to improve sulcus tube placement.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A 12-question survey was distributed electronically to American Glaucoma Society (AGS) members between November 6 and December 23, 2024. The survey assessed surgeons' current tube-shunt placement practice patterns, factors influencing tube placement decisions, and receptiveness to proposed technologies designed for sulcus tube placement. Descriptive analysis was performed on 121 completed responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents (55%) reported a preference for placing tubes in the anterior chamber (AC) for the majority of their pseudophakic patients, with efficiency (62%), safety (62%), and familiarity (57%) reported as primary factors for this decision. Barriers to sulcus placement included concern for intraocular bleeding (67%), technical difficulty of sulcus placement (54%), the risk of vitreous loss and tube occlusion (53%), and iris complications (53%). However, if a sulcus tube insertion technology was available and assuming a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated the superiority of sulcus over AC placement in minimizing endothelial cell loss (ECL), 85% of respondents indicated they would be likely to routinely place tubes in the sulcus. Features deemed very important for such a technology included tube placement accuracy (87%), ease of use (86%), IOP-lowering effectiveness (73%), time-efficiency (71%), and affordability (67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently, most glaucoma surgeons favor AC tube placement due to its familiarity, efficiency, and perceived safety, despite associated long-term risk of endothelial cell loss (ECL). Survey findings suggest strong interest in adopting sulcus placement, assuming a proven benefit on ECL and the availability of sulcus placement technologies designed to mitigate technical challenges. Development of robust data and reliable sulcus insertion technologies/techniques may change practice patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"2871-2877"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S532710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate glaucoma surgeons' practice patterns regarding glaucoma drainage device (GDD) tube shunt placement, assess their opinions on sulcus tube placement, and evaluate their receptiveness to technologies designed to improve sulcus tube placement.

Patients and methods: A 12-question survey was distributed electronically to American Glaucoma Society (AGS) members between November 6 and December 23, 2024. The survey assessed surgeons' current tube-shunt placement practice patterns, factors influencing tube placement decisions, and receptiveness to proposed technologies designed for sulcus tube placement. Descriptive analysis was performed on 121 completed responses.

Results: Most respondents (55%) reported a preference for placing tubes in the anterior chamber (AC) for the majority of their pseudophakic patients, with efficiency (62%), safety (62%), and familiarity (57%) reported as primary factors for this decision. Barriers to sulcus placement included concern for intraocular bleeding (67%), technical difficulty of sulcus placement (54%), the risk of vitreous loss and tube occlusion (53%), and iris complications (53%). However, if a sulcus tube insertion technology was available and assuming a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated the superiority of sulcus over AC placement in minimizing endothelial cell loss (ECL), 85% of respondents indicated they would be likely to routinely place tubes in the sulcus. Features deemed very important for such a technology included tube placement accuracy (87%), ease of use (86%), IOP-lowering effectiveness (73%), time-efficiency (71%), and affordability (67%).

Conclusion: Currently, most glaucoma surgeons favor AC tube placement due to its familiarity, efficiency, and perceived safety, despite associated long-term risk of endothelial cell loss (ECL). Survey findings suggest strong interest in adopting sulcus placement, assuming a proven benefit on ECL and the availability of sulcus placement technologies designed to mitigate technical challenges. Development of robust data and reliable sulcus insertion technologies/techniques may change practice patterns.

Abstract Image

沟管置入的实践模式和技术准备:美国青光眼协会会员调查。
目的:评价青光眼外科医生对青光眼引流装置(GDD)分流管置入的操作模式,评价青光眼外科医生对青光眼沟管置入的意见,评价青光眼外科医生对改善青光眼沟管置入技术的接受程度。患者和方法:一份包含12个问题的调查在2024年11月6日至12月23日期间以电子方式分发给美国青光眼协会(AGS)成员。该调查评估了外科医生目前的管分流置入实践模式、影响管置入决策的因素以及对拟议的沟管置入技术的接受程度。对121份完成的问卷进行描述性分析。结果:大多数受访者(55%)表示,他们更倾向于在大多数假性晶状体患者的前房(AC)放置导管,其中效率(62%)、安全性(62%)和熟悉度(57%)是决定这一决定的主要因素。植入沟的障碍包括眼内出血(67%)、植入沟的技术难度(54%)、玻璃体丢失和管闭塞的风险(53%)和虹膜并发症(53%)。然而,如果沟管插入技术是可用的,并且假设随机对照试验(RCT)证明了沟管置入比AC管置入在最小化内皮细胞损失(ECL)方面的优势,85%的受访者表示他们可能会常规地在沟管置入。对于这种技术来说,最重要的特征包括:置管精度(87%)、易用性(86%)、降低iops的有效性(73%)、时间效率(71%)和可负担性(67%)。结论:目前,尽管存在内皮细胞丢失(ECL)的长期风险,大多数青光眼外科医生还是倾向于AC管置入,因为它熟悉、高效、安全。调查结果表明,人们对采用沟槽放置有浓厚的兴趣,假设对ECL有证明的好处,并且可以使用旨在减轻技术挑战的沟槽放置技术。可靠的数据和可靠的沟插入技术/技术的发展可能会改变实践模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信