Applicability of Machine Learning Algorithms in Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and LQTS by Electrocardiogram Interpretation: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.9
Paulo Cainan Guimarães do Nascimento, Matthews Silva Martins, Alex Cleber Improta-Caria, Roque Aras Junior
{"title":"Applicability of Machine Learning Algorithms in Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and LQTS by Electrocardiogram Interpretation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Paulo Cainan Guimarães do Nascimento, Matthews Silva Martins, Alex Cleber Improta-Caria, Roque Aras Junior","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine Learning (ML) is a type of algorithm that autonomously learns to recognize complex patterns. In the diagnostic context of cardiac arrhythmias, these algorithms have shown significant advancements due to their ability to provide automated interpretation and pattern recognition in electrocardiograms (ECGs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze and identify the applicability, validity, and feasibility of ML algorithm models in the diagnostic process of cardiac arrhythmias through automated electrocardiogram interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic literature review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed between February 2022 and November 2022. The study period encompasses articles published between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search yielded 119 results, covering three subthemes: Long QT Syndrome (LQTS), corrected QT interval (QTc), and atrial fibrillation (AF). AF was the most prevalent theme. The sample sizes were quite variable. The outcomes were mostly satisfactory. In the diagnosis of LQTS using Artificial Intelligence (AI), the algorithm outperformed conventional methods in diagnostic distinction. In the evaluation of QTc, there was no difference between the AI-integrated ECG and the conventional ECG. In the diagnosis of AF, the algorithms, models, and devices demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, along with greater accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML models in the diagnostic process of cardiac arrhythmias are feasible and rapidly developing. They demonstrate accuracy values between 96.4% and 98.2%, sensitivity between 92.8% and 99.4%, and specificity between 95% and 98.1%, particularly in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 8","pages":"e20240843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Machine Learning (ML) is a type of algorithm that autonomously learns to recognize complex patterns. In the diagnostic context of cardiac arrhythmias, these algorithms have shown significant advancements due to their ability to provide automated interpretation and pattern recognition in electrocardiograms (ECGs).

Objective: To analyze and identify the applicability, validity, and feasibility of ML algorithm models in the diagnostic process of cardiac arrhythmias through automated electrocardiogram interpretation.

Methods: This systematic literature review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed between February 2022 and November 2022. The study period encompasses articles published between 2017 and 2022.

Results: The database search yielded 119 results, covering three subthemes: Long QT Syndrome (LQTS), corrected QT interval (QTc), and atrial fibrillation (AF). AF was the most prevalent theme. The sample sizes were quite variable. The outcomes were mostly satisfactory. In the diagnosis of LQTS using Artificial Intelligence (AI), the algorithm outperformed conventional methods in diagnostic distinction. In the evaluation of QTc, there was no difference between the AI-integrated ECG and the conventional ECG. In the diagnosis of AF, the algorithms, models, and devices demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, along with greater accuracy.

Conclusion: ML models in the diagnostic process of cardiac arrhythmias are feasible and rapidly developing. They demonstrate accuracy values between 96.4% and 98.2%, sensitivity between 92.8% and 99.4%, and specificity between 95% and 98.1%, particularly in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.

机器学习算法在心电图解释诊断心房颤动和LQTS中的适用性:系统综述。
背景:机器学习(ML)是一种自主学习识别复杂模式的算法。在心律失常的诊断方面,这些算法由于能够在心电图(ECGs)中提供自动解释和模式识别而显示出显著的进步。目的:通过心电图自动判读,分析识别ML算法模型在心律失常诊断过程中的适用性、有效性和可行性。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统文献综述。检索于2022年2月至2022年11月在Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、LILACS和PubMed进行。研究期间包括2017年至2022年之间发表的文章。结果:数据库检索产生119个结果,涵盖三个子主题:长QT综合征(LQTS)、校正QT间期(QTc)和心房颤动(AF)。AF是最普遍的主题。样本量变化很大。结果大多令人满意。在LQTS的人工智能诊断中,该算法在诊断区分方面优于传统方法。在QTc的评价上,人工智能综合心电图与常规心电图无差异。在AF的诊断中,算法、模型和设备具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,同时具有较高的准确性。结论:ML模型在心律失常诊断过程中是可行的,且发展迅速。它们的准确率在96.4%至98.2%之间,灵敏度在92.8%至99.4%之间,特异性在95%至98.1%之间,特别是在房颤的诊断中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信