MedVH: Toward Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context.

IF 6.1 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Zishan Gu, Jiayuan Chen, Fenglin Liu, Changchang Yin, Ping Zhang
{"title":"MedVH: Toward Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context.","authors":"Zishan Gu, Jiayuan Chen, Fenglin Liu, Changchang Yin, Ping Zhang","doi":"10.1002/aisy.202500255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large vision language models (LVLMs) have achieved superior performance on natural image and text tasks, inspiring extensive fine-tuning research. However, their robustness against hallucination in clinical contexts remains understudied. We propose the Medical Visual Hallucination Test (MedVH), a novel evaluation framework assessing hallucination tendencies in both medical-specific and general-purpose LVLMs. MedVH encompasses six tasks targeting medical hallucinations, including two traditional tasks and four novel tasks formatted as multi-choice visual question answering and long response generation. Our extensive experiments with six evaluation metrics reveal that medical LVLMs, despite promising performance on standard medical tasks, are particularly susceptible to hallucinations-often more so than general models. This raises significant concerns about domain-specific model reliability. For real-world applications, medical LVLMs must accurately integrate medical knowledge while maintaining robust reasoning to prevent hallucination. We explore mitigation methods without model-specific fine-tuning, including prompt engineering and collaboration between general and domain-specific models. Our work provides a foundation for future evaluation studies. The dataset is available at PhysioNet: https://physionet.org/content/medvh.</p>","PeriodicalId":93858,"journal":{"name":"Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202500255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large vision language models (LVLMs) have achieved superior performance on natural image and text tasks, inspiring extensive fine-tuning research. However, their robustness against hallucination in clinical contexts remains understudied. We propose the Medical Visual Hallucination Test (MedVH), a novel evaluation framework assessing hallucination tendencies in both medical-specific and general-purpose LVLMs. MedVH encompasses six tasks targeting medical hallucinations, including two traditional tasks and four novel tasks formatted as multi-choice visual question answering and long response generation. Our extensive experiments with six evaluation metrics reveal that medical LVLMs, despite promising performance on standard medical tasks, are particularly susceptible to hallucinations-often more so than general models. This raises significant concerns about domain-specific model reliability. For real-world applications, medical LVLMs must accurately integrate medical knowledge while maintaining robust reasoning to prevent hallucination. We explore mitigation methods without model-specific fine-tuning, including prompt engineering and collaboration between general and domain-specific models. Our work provides a foundation for future evaluation studies. The dataset is available at PhysioNet: https://physionet.org/content/medvh.

MedVH:对医学背景下大视觉语言模型幻觉的系统评价。
大型视觉语言模型(LVLMs)在自然图像和文本任务上取得了优异的表现,激发了广泛的微调研究。然而,它们在临床环境中对幻觉的稳健性仍有待研究。我们提出了医学视觉幻觉测试(MedVH),这是一种新的评估框架,可以评估医学特定和通用lvlm的幻觉倾向。MedVH包含六个针对医学幻觉的任务,包括两个传统任务和四个新任务,格式为多选择视觉问题回答和长反应生成。我们对六个评估指标的广泛实验表明,尽管医疗lvlm在标准医疗任务上表现良好,但它特别容易产生幻觉——通常比一般模型更容易产生幻觉。这引起了对特定于领域的模型可靠性的重大关注。对于现实世界的应用,医疗lvlm必须准确地整合医学知识,同时保持稳健的推理,以防止出现幻觉。我们探索没有特定于模型的微调的缓解方法,包括通用模型和特定于领域的模型之间的快速工程和协作。我们的工作为今后的评价研究奠定了基础。该数据集可在PhysioNet上获得:https://physionet.org/content/medvh。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信