Stakeholder Perspectives on EU Regulatory Frameworks: Navigating Critical Raw Materials, Battery Innovation, and Recycling Challenges.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.19634.2
Anish Patil, Willem Arie Vonk
{"title":"Stakeholder Perspectives on EU Regulatory Frameworks: Navigating Critical Raw Materials, Battery Innovation, and Recycling Challenges.","authors":"Anish Patil, Willem Arie Vonk","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.19634.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European Union's Green Deal Industrial Plan (GDIP), introduced in 2023, aims to advance sustainability, energy independence, and carbon neutrality by 2050. Supported by the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), the GDIP seeks to boost clean technology manufacturing, particularly in sectors like electric vehicles (EVs), while ensuring a secure supply of critical raw materials. Additionally, the EU Battery Regulation 2023 establishes strict lifecycle management requirements to promote circularity in the battery sector. However, policy fragmentation, regulatory complexity, and stakeholder concerns pose challenges to achieving these objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines the coherence of the GDIP and its associated policies, assessing whether they form a unified framework or introduce contradictions that hinder progress. Through stakeholder analysis, the research explores perceptions of regulatory effectiveness, industrial competitiveness, and the role of workforce skills in facilitating the green transition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that while these policies share common objectives, they exhibit overlaps and inconsistencies that create barriers to investment and innovation. Stakeholders express concerns about regulatory clarity and feasibility, emphasizing the need for realistic targets, streamlined processes, and greater social acceptance of industrial projects. The research also highlights a critical skills gap in green technologies, underlining the necessity of workforce development initiatives to support the transition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the GDIP to achieve its full potential, EU policies must be better aligned, with clearer regulatory frameworks and stronger stakeholder engagement. Addressing the skills shortage, promoting industrial careers, and leveraging tools like the European battery passport will be crucial in fostering collaboration and ensuring successful implementation of the EU's green industrial ambitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19634.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The European Union's Green Deal Industrial Plan (GDIP), introduced in 2023, aims to advance sustainability, energy independence, and carbon neutrality by 2050. Supported by the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), the GDIP seeks to boost clean technology manufacturing, particularly in sectors like electric vehicles (EVs), while ensuring a secure supply of critical raw materials. Additionally, the EU Battery Regulation 2023 establishes strict lifecycle management requirements to promote circularity in the battery sector. However, policy fragmentation, regulatory complexity, and stakeholder concerns pose challenges to achieving these objectives.

Methods: This study examines the coherence of the GDIP and its associated policies, assessing whether they form a unified framework or introduce contradictions that hinder progress. Through stakeholder analysis, the research explores perceptions of regulatory effectiveness, industrial competitiveness, and the role of workforce skills in facilitating the green transition.

Results: Findings indicate that while these policies share common objectives, they exhibit overlaps and inconsistencies that create barriers to investment and innovation. Stakeholders express concerns about regulatory clarity and feasibility, emphasizing the need for realistic targets, streamlined processes, and greater social acceptance of industrial projects. The research also highlights a critical skills gap in green technologies, underlining the necessity of workforce development initiatives to support the transition.

Conclusions: For the GDIP to achieve its full potential, EU policies must be better aligned, with clearer regulatory frameworks and stronger stakeholder engagement. Addressing the skills shortage, promoting industrial careers, and leveraging tools like the European battery passport will be crucial in fostering collaboration and ensuring successful implementation of the EU's green industrial ambitions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利益相关者对欧盟监管框架的看法:导航关键原材料、电池创新和回收挑战。
背景:欧盟的绿色交易工业计划(GDIP)于2023年推出,旨在到2050年促进可持续性、能源独立和碳中和。在《净零工业法案》(NZIA)和《关键原材料法案》(CRMA)的支持下,GDIP旨在促进清洁技术制造业,特别是在电动汽车(ev)等行业,同时确保关键原材料的安全供应。此外,欧盟电池法规2023建立了严格的生命周期管理要求,以促进电池行业的循环。然而,政策的分散、监管的复杂性和利益相关者的担忧给实现这些目标带来了挑战。方法:本研究考察了GDIP及其相关政策的一致性,评估它们是否形成了一个统一的框架,还是引入了阻碍进展的矛盾。通过利益相关者分析,本研究探讨了监管有效性、产业竞争力和劳动力技能在促进绿色转型中的作用。结果:研究结果表明,虽然这些政策具有共同的目标,但它们表现出重叠和不一致,从而对投资和创新造成障碍。利益相关者表达了对监管明确性和可行性的担忧,强调需要制定现实的目标、简化流程以及提高社会对工业项目的接受度。该研究还强调了绿色技术方面的关键技能差距,强调了劳动力发展举措支持转型的必要性。结论:为了使GDIP充分发挥其潜力,欧盟的政策必须更好地协调一致,有更清晰的监管框架和更强的利益相关者参与。解决技能短缺问题,促进工业发展,并利用欧洲电池护照等工具,对于促进合作和确保成功实施欧盟的绿色工业目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信