Capturing deep partial-thickness cartilage loss with semiquantitative scoring: A supplemented MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (sMOAKS)

Faysal Altahawi , Richard Lartey , Nancy Obuchowski , Xiaojuan Li , Carl S. Winalski
{"title":"Capturing deep partial-thickness cartilage loss with semiquantitative scoring: A supplemented MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (sMOAKS)","authors":"Faysal Altahawi ,&nbsp;Richard Lartey ,&nbsp;Nancy Obuchowski ,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Li ,&nbsp;Carl S. Winalski","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We propose a supplement to MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score) for capturing &gt;50 % partial thickness cartilage loss on knee MRI and measure reader agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>MOAKS scores 2 severity levels of cartilage damage (any loss, full-thickness loss) within knee subregions with lesional area graded 0–3. We propose supplemented MOAKS (sMOAKS) by adding a similarly graded third level assessment for deep cartilage loss (DCL), &gt;50 % thickness, in addition to traditional MOAKS for improved granularity of partial thickness cartilage loss. Using sMOAKS, two radiologists independently graded cartilage subscores for 40 knees and rescored 20 knees. Consolidated inter-reader and intra-reader agreement was calculated with kappa values for the DCL level supplement. To measure agreement for one example of a more granular combined sMOAKS outcome, coverage probability reader agreement was calculated for a scaled cartilage damage score (CDS), a summed normalized score (0–100) with equal weighting to articular surfaces combining subregion scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DCL represented 27.8 % (63/227) of partial but not full-thickness cartilage loss subregion interpretations. Pooled subregion DCL involving &gt;10 % surface area demonstrated 97.7 % (<em>ĸ</em> = 0.71) inter-reader agreement and 98.8 % (<em>ĸ</em> = 0.78) intra-reader agreement. For greatest subregion DCL size, weighted ĸ agreement was 0.73/0.82 (inter-reader/intra-reader) for articular surfaces and 0.75/0.83 for joint compartments. At 90 % CDS intra-reader agreement coverage, inter-reader CDS agreement values were 83 %, 82 %, and 78 % for surfaces, compartments, and whole joints, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is substantial agreement for deep cartilage loss detection using sMOAKS across varied analysis methods. Further assessment will determine when the added granularity of sMOAKS is beneficial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We propose a supplement to MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score) for capturing >50 % partial thickness cartilage loss on knee MRI and measure reader agreement.

Design

MOAKS scores 2 severity levels of cartilage damage (any loss, full-thickness loss) within knee subregions with lesional area graded 0–3. We propose supplemented MOAKS (sMOAKS) by adding a similarly graded third level assessment for deep cartilage loss (DCL), >50 % thickness, in addition to traditional MOAKS for improved granularity of partial thickness cartilage loss. Using sMOAKS, two radiologists independently graded cartilage subscores for 40 knees and rescored 20 knees. Consolidated inter-reader and intra-reader agreement was calculated with kappa values for the DCL level supplement. To measure agreement for one example of a more granular combined sMOAKS outcome, coverage probability reader agreement was calculated for a scaled cartilage damage score (CDS), a summed normalized score (0–100) with equal weighting to articular surfaces combining subregion scores.

Results

DCL represented 27.8 % (63/227) of partial but not full-thickness cartilage loss subregion interpretations. Pooled subregion DCL involving >10 % surface area demonstrated 97.7 % (ĸ = 0.71) inter-reader agreement and 98.8 % (ĸ = 0.78) intra-reader agreement. For greatest subregion DCL size, weighted ĸ agreement was 0.73/0.82 (inter-reader/intra-reader) for articular surfaces and 0.75/0.83 for joint compartments. At 90 % CDS intra-reader agreement coverage, inter-reader CDS agreement values were 83 %, 82 %, and 78 % for surfaces, compartments, and whole joints, respectively.

Conclusions

There is substantial agreement for deep cartilage loss detection using sMOAKS across varied analysis methods. Further assessment will determine when the added granularity of sMOAKS is beneficial.
半定量评分捕捉深层部分厚度软骨损失:补充MRI骨关节炎膝关节评分(sMOAKS)。
目的:我们建议对MOAKS (MRI骨关节炎膝关节评分)进行补充,用于在膝关节MRI上捕获bbb50 %的部分软骨厚度损失,并测量读者的同意度。设计:MOAKS评分膝关节亚区软骨损伤的严重程度为2级(任何损失,全层损失),病变面积为0-3级。我们建议对MOAKS (sMOAKS)进行补充,在传统MOAKS的基础上,对深度软骨损失(DCL)进行类似分级的第三级评估,厚度为50%,以改善部分厚度软骨损失的粒度。使用sMOAKS,两名放射科医生对40个膝关节的软骨进行了独立评分,并对20个膝关节进行了恢复。用kappa值计算DCL水平补充的综合读者间和读者内协议。为了衡量一个更颗粒化的sMOAKS结果的一致性,计算了一个分级软骨损伤评分(CDS)的覆盖概率读者一致性,这是一个与关节表面结合子区域评分同等权重的标准化评分(0-100)。结果:DCL占部分而非全层软骨丢失亚区解释的27.8%(63/227)。涉及bbb10 %表面积的合并子区域DCL显示97.7% ( =0.71)阅读器间一致性和98.8% ( =0.78)阅读器内一致性。对于最大的子区域DCL大小,关节面加权一致度为0.73/0.82(阅读器间/阅读器内),关节室加权一致度为0.75/0.83。在90%的CDS读卡器内一致性覆盖率下,表面、隔间和整个关节的读卡器间CDS一致性值分别为83%、82%和78%。结论:在不同的分析方法中,使用sMOAKS检测深层软骨损失有很大的一致性。进一步的评估将决定何时增加sMOAKS粒度是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信