Retrospective Evaluation of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Horses That Required Emergency Laparotomy: 341 Cases of Noninfectious Causes of Gastrointestinal Colic (2019–2024)

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alessandro Migliorisi, Bridget Nottle, Lauren E. Smanik, Yvette S. Nout-Lomas, Diana M. Hassel
{"title":"Retrospective Evaluation of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Horses That Required Emergency Laparotomy: 341 Cases of Noninfectious Causes of Gastrointestinal Colic (2019–2024)","authors":"Alessandro Migliorisi,&nbsp;Bridget Nottle,&nbsp;Lauren E. Smanik,&nbsp;Yvette S. Nout-Lomas,&nbsp;Diana M. Hassel","doi":"10.1111/vec.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To (1) compare total nucleated cell count (TNCC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at admission between horses with medically managed, large intestinal (LI) and small intestinal (SI) surgical colic; (2) compare TNCC and NLR between survivors and nonsurvivors; and (3) investigate associations between TNCC, NLR, surgical intervention, and outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Case–control study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Single, academic institution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 341 adult horses diagnosed with noninfectious medical or surgical colic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>Admission TNCC did not differ between the medical and combined surgical groups, but NLR was higher in the surgical group (3.3 [2–5.2]) compared to the medical group (2.2 [1.6–3.4]). There was no difference in TNCC among the medical, LI, and SI groups, but the SI group's NLR (3.9 [2.8–6.3]) was higher compared to the medical (2.2 [1.6–3.4]) and LI (3.2 [1.6–4.8]) groups. TNCC was not different between survivors and nonsurvivors, but admission NLR was higher in nonsurvivors (3.6 [2–4.8]) compared to survivors (2.7 [1.7–4]). There was no association between admission TNCC and surgical intervention or outcome, but associations were found between NLR and both the need for surgical intervention and outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>NLR, but not TNCC, at admission is increased in horses with surgical intestinal lesions. Overlap in data precludes its use as a sole marker for case identification, and interpretation of NLR should therefore be performed considering appropriate clinical context. Prospective studies accounting for measurement of adrenocortical hormones are required to investigate NLR changes during the stress response in horses presenting with colic.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"35 4","pages":"378-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To (1) compare total nucleated cell count (TNCC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at admission between horses with medically managed, large intestinal (LI) and small intestinal (SI) surgical colic; (2) compare TNCC and NLR between survivors and nonsurvivors; and (3) investigate associations between TNCC, NLR, surgical intervention, and outcome.

Design

Case–control study.

Setting

Single, academic institution.

Animals

A total of 341 adult horses diagnosed with noninfectious medical or surgical colic.

Measurements and Main Results

Admission TNCC did not differ between the medical and combined surgical groups, but NLR was higher in the surgical group (3.3 [2–5.2]) compared to the medical group (2.2 [1.6–3.4]). There was no difference in TNCC among the medical, LI, and SI groups, but the SI group's NLR (3.9 [2.8–6.3]) was higher compared to the medical (2.2 [1.6–3.4]) and LI (3.2 [1.6–4.8]) groups. TNCC was not different between survivors and nonsurvivors, but admission NLR was higher in nonsurvivors (3.6 [2–4.8]) compared to survivors (2.7 [1.7–4]). There was no association between admission TNCC and surgical intervention or outcome, but associations were found between NLR and both the need for surgical intervention and outcome.

Conclusions

NLR, but not TNCC, at admission is increased in horses with surgical intestinal lesions. Overlap in data precludes its use as a sole marker for case identification, and interpretation of NLR should therefore be performed considering appropriate clinical context. Prospective studies accounting for measurement of adrenocortical hormones are required to investigate NLR changes during the stress response in horses presenting with colic.

Abstract Image

需要紧急剖腹手术的马中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比例增加(2019-2024):341例非感染性原因的胃肠道绞痛
目的:(1)比较医学治疗的大肠(LI)和小肠(SI)手术绞痛马入院时的总有核细胞计数(TNCC)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR);(2)比较幸存者和非幸存者的TNCC和NLR;(3)研究TNCC、NLR、手术干预和预后之间的关系。设计:病例对照研究。背景:单身,学术机构。动物:共有341匹成年马被诊断为非传染性内科或外科绞痛。测量和主要结果:入院TNCC在内科组和联合手术组之间没有差异,但NLR在手术组(3.3[2-5.2])高于内科组(2.2[1.6-3.4])。医学组、LI组和SI组的TNCC无差异,但SI组的NLR(3.9[2.8-6.3])高于医学组(2.2[1.6-3.4])和LI组(3.2[1.6-4.8])。TNCC在幸存者和非幸存者之间没有差异,但非幸存者的入院NLR(3.6[2-4.8])高于幸存者(2.7[1.7-4])。入院TNCC与手术干预或结果之间没有关联,但NLR与手术干预的需要和结果之间存在关联。结论:在有外科肠道病变的马中,入院时NLR增加,而TNCC没有增加。数据的重叠排除了将其作为病例识别的唯一标记物,因此对NLR的解释应考虑适当的临床情况。考虑到肾上腺皮质激素测量的前瞻性研究需要调查应激反应期间的NLR变化在马表现为绞痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信