Early Experience with Robotic Pancreatic Resections: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 20 Consecutive Cases.

Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza, Massimo Giuseppe Viola
{"title":"Early Experience with Robotic Pancreatic Resections: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 20 Consecutive Cases.","authors":"Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza, Massimo Giuseppe Viola","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic pancreatic surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open procedures, offering potential benefits in precision and recovery. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and learning curve of robotic duodenopancreatectomy (RDP) and robotic distal splenopancreatectomy (RDSP) during the initial phase of implementation at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive patients, who underwent RDP (n=12) or RDSP (n=8) between January 2020 and December 2022, was performed. Data on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rates, postoperative complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo and ISGPS criteria) and length of hospital stay (LOS) were collected. Early (first six RDPs and four RDSPs) and late cases were compared to assess progression along the learning curve. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median operative time for RDP decreased from 480 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 420-540] in early cases to 390 minutes (IQR 360-420) in later cases (p=0.03). The operative time for RDSP remained stable at 300 minutes (IQR 240-360; p=0.12). Intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR 100-400) for RDP and 150 mL (IQR 50-300) for RDSP. Two RDP cases (16.7%) required conversion to open surgery due to vascular adhesions. Postoperative complications included pancreatic fistula in 20% of cases, delayed gastric emptying in 15% of cases and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) in 25% of cases. The median LOS was 10 days (IQR 8-18) for RDP and seven days (IQR 5-10) for RDSP. No 90-day mortality was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic pancreatic resections are feasible and safe during the early learning curve, with morbidity comparable to open surgery. Operative efficiency improved significantly for RDP, highlighting the importance of structured training and case volume. These findings support the adoption of robotic techniques in pancreatic surgery, though further studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"20 2","pages":"151-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic pancreatic surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open procedures, offering potential benefits in precision and recovery. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and learning curve of robotic duodenopancreatectomy (RDP) and robotic distal splenopancreatectomy (RDSP) during the initial phase of implementation at a single institution.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive patients, who underwent RDP (n=12) or RDSP (n=8) between January 2020 and December 2022, was performed. Data on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rates, postoperative complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo and ISGPS criteria) and length of hospital stay (LOS) were collected. Early (first six RDPs and four RDSPs) and late cases were compared to assess progression along the learning curve. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests.

Results: The median operative time for RDP decreased from 480 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 420-540] in early cases to 390 minutes (IQR 360-420) in later cases (p=0.03). The operative time for RDSP remained stable at 300 minutes (IQR 240-360; p=0.12). Intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR 100-400) for RDP and 150 mL (IQR 50-300) for RDSP. Two RDP cases (16.7%) required conversion to open surgery due to vascular adhesions. Postoperative complications included pancreatic fistula in 20% of cases, delayed gastric emptying in 15% of cases and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) in 25% of cases. The median LOS was 10 days (IQR 8-18) for RDP and seven days (IQR 5-10) for RDSP. No 90-day mortality was observed.

Conclusions: Robotic pancreatic resections are feasible and safe during the early learning curve, with morbidity comparable to open surgery. Operative efficiency improved significantly for RDP, highlighting the importance of structured training and case volume. These findings support the adoption of robotic techniques in pancreatic surgery, though further studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.

机器人胰腺切除术的早期经验:20例连续病例的回顾性队列研究。
背景:机器人胰腺手术已经成为开放手术的一种微创替代方法,在精确度和恢复方面具有潜在的优势。本研究评估了机器人十二指肠胰切除术(RDP)和机器人远端脾胰切除术(RDSP)在单个机构实施初期的可行性、安全性和学习曲线。方法:对2020年1月至2022年12月期间连续20例接受RDP (n=12)或RDSP (n=8)的患者进行回顾性分析。收集手术时间、术中出血量、转换率、术后并发症(按Clavien-Dindo和ISGPS标准分类)和住院时间(LOS)的数据。比较早期(前6例rdp和4例rdp)和晚期病例,以评估学习曲线的进展。统计分析包括Mann-Whitney U和Fisher的精确检验。结果:RDP的中位手术时间由早期的480分钟[四分位间距(IQR) 420 ~ 540]减少到晚期的390分钟(IQR 360 ~ 420) (p=0.03)。RDSP手术时间稳定在300分钟(IQR 240 ~ 360; p=0.12)。RDP术中出血量为200 mL (IQR 100-400), RDSP术中出血量为150 mL (IQR 50-300)。2例RDP病例(16.7%)由于血管粘连需要转开手术。术后并发症包括20%的病例胰瘘,15%的病例胃排空延迟,25%的病例主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥III)。RDP的中位生存期为10天(IQR 8-18), RDSP的中位生存期为7天(IQR 5-10)。未见90天死亡率。结论:机器人胰腺切除术在早期学习曲线是可行和安全的,其发病率与开放手术相当。RDP的手术效率显著提高,突出了结构化培训和病例量的重要性。这些发现支持机器人技术在胰腺手术中的应用,尽管需要进一步的研究来验证其长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信