Pegah Bakhtiary, Matine Gharavi, Hooman Ebrahimi, Katayoun Salem
{"title":"The Effects of Nanohydroxyapatite with and without Low-Power Laser and Cold Atmospheric Plasma on Enamel Remineralization: <i>in vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Pegah Bakhtiary, Matine Gharavi, Hooman Ebrahimi, Katayoun Salem","doi":"10.30476/dentjods.2024.102452.2363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remineralizing early enamel lesions in primary dentition remain a significant challenge in dentistry, requiring innovative approaches to enhance enamel repair.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available nanohydroxyapatite paste (Nano P), alone and in combination with air dielectric barrier discharge cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) and a 940-nm diode laser, on enamel remineralization.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> study, 105 intact anterior primary teeth were randomly assigned into one control and six experimental groups: (I) control, (II) Fluoride varnish, (III) Nano P, (IV) Nano P + dye + laser, (V) Nano P + laser, (VI) CAP, and (VII) Nano P + CAP. Caries-like lesions were induced by demineralization. Microhardness was evaluated before and after demineralization and 4 weeks post-remineralization with pH cycling. Data analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA (α=.05) and Tamhane's Post-Hoc test, with effect sizes determined by Cohen's d test and Hedges' g correction. The percentage of recovery of the enamel microhardness was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial and secondary microhardness were similar across groups (<i>p</i> Value >.05). Post-remineralization, significant differences were observed (<i>p</i>< 0.05), with the highest microhardness in the Nano P+ laser group, followed by Nano P+ dye+ laser, Nano P+ CAP, Nano P, fluoride varnish, CAP, and the control. Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between all pairs except Nano P+ laser and Nano P+ dye + laser (<i>p</i>= 0.7, Effect size=0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nano P combined with a laser, followed by Nano P with plasma, and Nano P alone significantly increased microhardness more than fluoride or plasma, suggesting these combinations as effective alternatives for enamel remineralization in primary teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"26 3","pages":"233-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2024.102452.2363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Remineralizing early enamel lesions in primary dentition remain a significant challenge in dentistry, requiring innovative approaches to enhance enamel repair.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available nanohydroxyapatite paste (Nano P), alone and in combination with air dielectric barrier discharge cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) and a 940-nm diode laser, on enamel remineralization.
Materials and method: In this in vitro study, 105 intact anterior primary teeth were randomly assigned into one control and six experimental groups: (I) control, (II) Fluoride varnish, (III) Nano P, (IV) Nano P + dye + laser, (V) Nano P + laser, (VI) CAP, and (VII) Nano P + CAP. Caries-like lesions were induced by demineralization. Microhardness was evaluated before and after demineralization and 4 weeks post-remineralization with pH cycling. Data analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA (α=.05) and Tamhane's Post-Hoc test, with effect sizes determined by Cohen's d test and Hedges' g correction. The percentage of recovery of the enamel microhardness was calculated.
Results: Initial and secondary microhardness were similar across groups (p Value >.05). Post-remineralization, significant differences were observed (p< 0.05), with the highest microhardness in the Nano P+ laser group, followed by Nano P+ dye+ laser, Nano P+ CAP, Nano P, fluoride varnish, CAP, and the control. Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between all pairs except Nano P+ laser and Nano P+ dye + laser (p= 0.7, Effect size=0.4).
Conclusion: Nano P combined with a laser, followed by Nano P with plasma, and Nano P alone significantly increased microhardness more than fluoride or plasma, suggesting these combinations as effective alternatives for enamel remineralization in primary teeth.