Assessing the Use of Welfare Technology in Social Care for Older Adults Through Assistant Nurses' Perceptions of Upskilling and Care Delivery Outcomes: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 4
JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.2196/65641
Mahwish Naseer, Lotta Dellve
{"title":"Assessing the Use of Welfare Technology in Social Care for Older Adults Through Assistant Nurses' Perceptions of Upskilling and Care Delivery Outcomes: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Mahwish Naseer, Lotta Dellve","doi":"10.2196/65641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of welfare technologies, a broad array of technologies that have the potential to maintain or improve individuals' safety, independence, and participation, has increased rapidly in recent years, offering new ways of delivering care. However, studies of welfare technology use in the social care sector are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the use of different types of welfare technologies, training in the use of these technologies, and to identify their associations with outcomes for care recipients and frontline care workers in the social care of older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted based on a nationwide randomized sample of assistant nurses employed in social care for older adults in Sweden (N=1163; response rate 23%). Dependent variables were outcomes for care recipients (continuity of care, participation, and reduction in loneliness) and upskilling for frontline care workers. The exposure variables were types of welfare technologies and training in the use of such technologies. Associations between exposure and dependent variables were assessed through logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the perceptions of care workers, interactive technologies were significantly positively associated with continuity of care (odds ratio [OR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.15-2.18), participation (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.74), and reduction in loneliness among care recipients (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.41-2.62). In addition, there was a significant positive association between interactive technologies and upskilling of care workers (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.58-3.79). Despite the benefits of welfare technology, the effects can also be negative, as shown by the findings on the use of digital documentation (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96), digital locks or cameras or sensors (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84), and the lower likelihood of participation. Training in the use of welfare technology was significantly associated with outcomes for care recipients (continuity of care: OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.53-2.66; participation: OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45-2.51; reduction in loneliness: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.31-2.30), as well as upskilling of care workers (OR 4.59, 95% CI 3.28-6.42). The interaction analyses showed that participants who had not received any training but used digital documentation reported favorable views on continuity of care and upskilling, whereas those who had received training expressed concerns about participation and addressing loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The potential outcomes of welfare technology use in social care for older adults can vary with the types of technologies used. Care workers hold positive perceptions toward interactive technologies to improve care delivery outcomes and skill development. The findings on training and improved outcomes suggest that investing resources to promote training can reinforce positive experiences. While training had a positive impact, the interaction effects of digital documentation and training were mixed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"8 ","pages":"e65641"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The implementation of welfare technologies, a broad array of technologies that have the potential to maintain or improve individuals' safety, independence, and participation, has increased rapidly in recent years, offering new ways of delivering care. However, studies of welfare technology use in the social care sector are scarce.

Objective: This study aims to explore the use of different types of welfare technologies, training in the use of these technologies, and to identify their associations with outcomes for care recipients and frontline care workers in the social care of older adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted based on a nationwide randomized sample of assistant nurses employed in social care for older adults in Sweden (N=1163; response rate 23%). Dependent variables were outcomes for care recipients (continuity of care, participation, and reduction in loneliness) and upskilling for frontline care workers. The exposure variables were types of welfare technologies and training in the use of such technologies. Associations between exposure and dependent variables were assessed through logistic regression models.

Results: According to the perceptions of care workers, interactive technologies were significantly positively associated with continuity of care (odds ratio [OR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.15-2.18), participation (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.74), and reduction in loneliness among care recipients (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.41-2.62). In addition, there was a significant positive association between interactive technologies and upskilling of care workers (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.58-3.79). Despite the benefits of welfare technology, the effects can also be negative, as shown by the findings on the use of digital documentation (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96), digital locks or cameras or sensors (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84), and the lower likelihood of participation. Training in the use of welfare technology was significantly associated with outcomes for care recipients (continuity of care: OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.53-2.66; participation: OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45-2.51; reduction in loneliness: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.31-2.30), as well as upskilling of care workers (OR 4.59, 95% CI 3.28-6.42). The interaction analyses showed that participants who had not received any training but used digital documentation reported favorable views on continuity of care and upskilling, whereas those who had received training expressed concerns about participation and addressing loneliness.

Conclusions: The potential outcomes of welfare technology use in social care for older adults can vary with the types of technologies used. Care workers hold positive perceptions toward interactive technologies to improve care delivery outcomes and skill development. The findings on training and improved outcomes suggest that investing resources to promote training can reinforce positive experiences. While training had a positive impact, the interaction effects of digital documentation and training were mixed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过助理护士对提高技能和护理交付结果的感知来评估福利技术在老年人社会护理中的使用:横断面研究。
背景:福利技术是一种广泛的技术,具有维护或改善个人安全、独立性和参与的潜力。近年来,福利技术的实施迅速增加,提供了提供护理的新途径。然而,福利技术在社会关怀部门的应用研究很少。目的:本研究旨在探讨不同类型的福利技术的使用、使用这些技术的培训,并确定它们与护理对象和一线护理工作者在老年人社会护理中的结果的关联。方法:对瑞典全国范围内从事老年人社会护理工作的助理护士进行横断面调查(N=1163,回复率23%)。因变量是护理接受者的结果(护理的连续性、参与和孤独感的减少)和一线护理人员技能的提高。暴露变量是福利技术的种类和使用这类技术的培训。通过逻辑回归模型评估暴露与因变量之间的关系。结果:根据护理人员的看法,互动技术与护理的连续性(比值比[OR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.15-2.18)、参与(比值比[OR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.74)和护理接受者孤独感的减少(比值比[OR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.41-2.62)显著正相关。此外,互动技术与护理人员技能提升之间存在显著的正相关(OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.58-3.79)。尽管福利技术带来了好处,但其影响也可能是负面的,如数字文件的使用(OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96)、数字锁或摄像头或传感器的使用(OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84)以及参与率较低的调查结果所示。使用福利技术的培训与护理接受者的结果(护理连续性:OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.53-2.66;参与:OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45-2.51;孤独感减少:OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.31-2.30)以及护理工作者的技能提升(OR 4.59, 95% CI 3.28-6.42)显著相关。互动分析表明,没有接受过任何培训但使用数字文档的参与者对护理的连续性和技能提升持积极态度,而接受过培训的参与者则对参与和解决孤独感表示担忧。结论:福利技术在老年人社会护理中使用的潜在结果可能因使用的技术类型而异。护理工作者对互动技术持积极看法,以改善护理交付结果和技能发展。关于培训和改善结果的研究结果表明,投入资源促进培训可以加强积极的体验。虽然培训有积极的影响,但数字文件和培训的相互作用效果好坏参半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信