Large Language Models in Nursing Education: Concept Analysis.

IF 4
JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI:10.2196/77948
Julia Harrington, Richard G Booth, Kimberley T Jackson
{"title":"Large Language Models in Nursing Education: Concept Analysis.","authors":"Julia Harrington, Richard G Booth, Kimberley T Jackson","doi":"10.2196/77948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in nursing education, yet their conceptual foundations remain abstract and underexplored. This concept analysis addresses the need for clarity by examining the relevance, meaning, contextual applications, and defining attributes of LLMs in nursing education, using Rodgers' evolutionary method.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to explore the evolutionary concept of LLMs in nursing education by providing a concept analysis through a comprehensive review of the existing published literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method was used. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant publications. A total of 41 papers were included based on inclusion criteria that focused on studies published in English within the last 5 years to ensure relevance to the current use of LLMs exclusively in nursing education. Studies were excluded if they focused on clinical nursing applications, were not available in English, lacked full-text accessibility, or examined other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies unrelated to LLMs (eg, robotics).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of this analysis, a proposed definition of LLMs in nursing education has been developed, describing them as accessible, personalized, innovative, and interactive tools that create revolutionary learning experiences, often leading to enhanced cognitive and skill development and improvement in learning and teaching quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This concept analysis highlights LLMs' transformative potential to enhance access to resources, support individualized learning, and augment nursing education. While promising, careful attention must be given to their limitations and ethical implications, ensuring their integration aligns with the values and goals of nursing education, particularly in specialized areas such as graduate nursing programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"8 ","pages":"e77948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/77948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in nursing education, yet their conceptual foundations remain abstract and underexplored. This concept analysis addresses the need for clarity by examining the relevance, meaning, contextual applications, and defining attributes of LLMs in nursing education, using Rodgers' evolutionary method.

Objective: This paper aims to explore the evolutionary concept of LLMs in nursing education by providing a concept analysis through a comprehensive review of the existing published literature.

Methods: Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method was used. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant publications. A total of 41 papers were included based on inclusion criteria that focused on studies published in English within the last 5 years to ensure relevance to the current use of LLMs exclusively in nursing education. Studies were excluded if they focused on clinical nursing applications, were not available in English, lacked full-text accessibility, or examined other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies unrelated to LLMs (eg, robotics).

Results: As a result of this analysis, a proposed definition of LLMs in nursing education has been developed, describing them as accessible, personalized, innovative, and interactive tools that create revolutionary learning experiences, often leading to enhanced cognitive and skill development and improvement in learning and teaching quality.

Conclusions: This concept analysis highlights LLMs' transformative potential to enhance access to resources, support individualized learning, and augment nursing education. While promising, careful attention must be given to their limitations and ethical implications, ensuring their integration aligns with the values and goals of nursing education, particularly in specialized areas such as graduate nursing programs.

护理教育中的大语言模式:概念分析。
背景:大型语言模型(llm)在护理教育中的应用越来越多,但其概念基础仍然是抽象的,尚未得到充分探讨。这个概念分析通过检查相关性、意义、上下文应用和定义护理教育法学硕士的属性,使用罗杰斯的进化方法,解决了清晰的需要。目的:本文旨在通过对现有已发表文献的综合回顾,进行概念分析,探讨护理教育法学硕士概念的演变。方法:采用Rodgers进化概念分析法。使用PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus和谷歌Scholar检索相关出版物。根据纳入标准,共纳入了41篇论文,这些论文主要集中在过去5年内用英语发表的研究,以确保与当前法学硕士在护理教育中的应用相关。如果研究的重点是临床护理应用,没有英文版本,缺乏全文可访问性,或者研究了与法学硕士无关的其他人工智能(AI)技术(如机器人技术),则排除。结果:根据这一分析,提出了护理教育法学硕士的定义,将其描述为可访问的、个性化的、创新的和互动的工具,这些工具创造了革命性的学习体验,通常会增强认知和技能的发展,并提高学习和教学质量。结论:这一概念分析强调了法学硕士在促进资源获取、支持个性化学习和增强护理教育方面的变革潜力。虽然有希望,但必须仔细注意它们的局限性和伦理影响,确保它们的整合与护理教育的价值观和目标保持一致,特别是在专业领域,如护理研究生课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信