CICADA: An automated and flexible tool for comprehensive fMRI noise reduction.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/IMAG.a.114
Keith Dodd, Maureen McHugo, Lauren Sarabia, Korey P Wylie, Kristina T Legget, Marc-Andre Cornier, Jason R Tregellas
{"title":"CICADA: An automated and flexible tool for comprehensive fMRI noise reduction.","authors":"Keith Dodd, Maureen McHugo, Lauren Sarabia, Korey P Wylie, Kristina T Legget, Marc-Andre Cornier, Jason R Tregellas","doi":"10.1162/IMAG.a.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Independent component analysis (ICA) denoising methods can be highly effective for reducing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) noise. ICA denoising method success heavily depends, however, on the accurate classification of fMRI data ICs as either neural signal or noise. While manual IC classification (\"manual ICA denoising\") is a current gold-standard, it requires extensive time and training. Automated methods of IC classification (\"automated ICA denoising\"), meanwhile, are less accurate and effective, especially in clinical populations where motion artifacts are more common. To address these challenges, a novel denoising method, Comprehensive Independent Component Analysis Denoising Assistant (CICADA), was developed. Uniquely, CICADA uses manual classification guidelines to automatically, comprehensively, and accurately capture most common sources of fMRI noise. As such, we hypothesized that CICADA would perform similarly to manual ICA denoising and outperform other current automated denoising methods. CICADA was evaluated against two well-established automated ICA denoising methods (FIX and ICA-AROMA) across three fMRI datasets. The datasets included high-motion resting-state (N = 57) and visual-task data (N = 53), both from individuals with schizophrenia, as well as low-motion resting-state healthy control data from an openly available dataset (N = 56). IC classification accuracy was first evaluated against manual IC classification in a subset (N = 30) of each dataset. Denoising performance efficacy was then evaluated with commonly used quality control (QC) benchmarks and correlations with fMRI noise profiles across all data. With a 97.9% mean overall accuracy in IC classification, CICADA performed nearly as well as manual IC classification and was significantly more accurate than FIX (92.9% mean overall accuracy; all p-values < 0.01) and ICA-AROMA (83.8% mean overall accuracy; all p-values < 0.001). CICADA also matched or outperformed FIX and ICA-AROMA across most QC and noise profile metrics across all data. Furthermore, CICADA greatly eased implementation of manual ICA denoising by decreasing the number of ICs a user must inspect by an average of 75%. Overall, CICADA is a novel, accurate, comprehensive, and automated ICA denoising tool for use in both resting-state and task-based fMRI. It performed similarly to the labor-intensive manual IC classification gold-standard and, in some datasets, outperformed current automated ICA denoising methods. Finally, CICADA may facilitate more efficient manual ICA denoising without reducing efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73341,"journal":{"name":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) denoising methods can be highly effective for reducing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) noise. ICA denoising method success heavily depends, however, on the accurate classification of fMRI data ICs as either neural signal or noise. While manual IC classification ("manual ICA denoising") is a current gold-standard, it requires extensive time and training. Automated methods of IC classification ("automated ICA denoising"), meanwhile, are less accurate and effective, especially in clinical populations where motion artifacts are more common. To address these challenges, a novel denoising method, Comprehensive Independent Component Analysis Denoising Assistant (CICADA), was developed. Uniquely, CICADA uses manual classification guidelines to automatically, comprehensively, and accurately capture most common sources of fMRI noise. As such, we hypothesized that CICADA would perform similarly to manual ICA denoising and outperform other current automated denoising methods. CICADA was evaluated against two well-established automated ICA denoising methods (FIX and ICA-AROMA) across three fMRI datasets. The datasets included high-motion resting-state (N = 57) and visual-task data (N = 53), both from individuals with schizophrenia, as well as low-motion resting-state healthy control data from an openly available dataset (N = 56). IC classification accuracy was first evaluated against manual IC classification in a subset (N = 30) of each dataset. Denoising performance efficacy was then evaluated with commonly used quality control (QC) benchmarks and correlations with fMRI noise profiles across all data. With a 97.9% mean overall accuracy in IC classification, CICADA performed nearly as well as manual IC classification and was significantly more accurate than FIX (92.9% mean overall accuracy; all p-values < 0.01) and ICA-AROMA (83.8% mean overall accuracy; all p-values < 0.001). CICADA also matched or outperformed FIX and ICA-AROMA across most QC and noise profile metrics across all data. Furthermore, CICADA greatly eased implementation of manual ICA denoising by decreasing the number of ICs a user must inspect by an average of 75%. Overall, CICADA is a novel, accurate, comprehensive, and automated ICA denoising tool for use in both resting-state and task-based fMRI. It performed similarly to the labor-intensive manual IC classification gold-standard and, in some datasets, outperformed current automated ICA denoising methods. Finally, CICADA may facilitate more efficient manual ICA denoising without reducing efficacy.

CICADA:一个自动化和灵活的工具,全面的fMRI降噪。
独立分量分析(ICA)去噪方法可以有效地降低功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的噪声。然而,ICA去噪方法的成功与否在很大程度上取决于功能磁共振成像数据ic是神经信号还是噪声的准确分类。虽然手动集成电路分类(“手动集成电路去噪”)是当前的黄金标准,但它需要大量的时间和培训。同时,自动集成电路分类方法(“自动集成电路去噪”)的准确性和有效性较低,特别是在运动伪影更常见的临床人群中。为了解决这些问题,开发了一种新的去噪方法——综合独立分量分析去噪助手(CICADA)。独特的是,CICADA使用手动分类指南来自动,全面,准确地捕获最常见的fMRI噪声源。因此,我们假设CICADA将执行类似于手动ICA去噪,并且优于当前其他自动去噪方法。CICADA在三个fMRI数据集上对两种成熟的自动ICA去噪方法(FIX和ICA- aroma)进行了评估。数据集包括高运动静息状态(N = 57)和视觉任务数据(N = 53),均来自精神分裂症患者,以及来自公开可用数据集的低运动静息状态健康对照数据(N = 56)。首先在每个数据集的一个子集(N = 30)中对人工IC分类的准确性进行评估。然后用常用的质量控制(QC)基准和所有数据中与fMRI噪声谱的相关性来评估降噪性能的有效性。CICADA在IC分类中的平均总准确率为97.9%,几乎与人工IC分类一样准确,并且显著高于FIX(平均总准确率92.9%,所有p值< 0.01)和ICA-AROMA(平均总准确率83.8%,所有p值< 0.001)。CICADA在所有数据的大多数QC和噪声指标上也与FIX和ICA-AROMA相匹配或优于它们。此外,CICADA通过将用户必须检查的ic数量平均减少75%,大大简化了手动ICA去噪的实现。总的来说,CICADA是一种新颖、准确、全面、自动化的ICA去噪工具,可用于静息状态和基于任务的fMRI。它的表现类似于劳动密集型的手动IC分类金标准,并且在一些数据集中,优于当前的自动ICA去噪方法。最后,CICADA可以在不降低有效性的情况下促进更有效的手动ICA去噪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信