Applications of generative artificial intelligence in outcome prediction in intensive care medicine-a scoping review.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1633458
Tanja Stamm, Mohamed Bader-El-Den, James McNicholas, Jim Briggs, Peng Zhao
{"title":"Applications of generative artificial intelligence in outcome prediction in intensive care medicine-a scoping review.","authors":"Tanja Stamm, Mohamed Bader-El-Den, James McNicholas, Jim Briggs, Peng Zhao","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1633458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a patient survives the first 24 h in intensive care, outcome prediction is crucial for further treatment decisions. As recent advances have shown that Artificial Intelligence (AI) outperforms clinicians in prognostication, and especially generative AI has developed rapidly in the past ten years, this scoping review aimed to explore the use of generative AI models for outcome prediction in intensive care medicine. Of the 481 records found in the search, 119 studies were subjected to abstract screening and, when necessary, full-text review for eligibility assessment. Twenty-two studies and two review articles were finally included. The studies were categorized into three prototypical use cases for generative AI in outcome prediction in intensive care: (i) data augmentation, (ii) feature generation from unstructured data, and (iii) prediction by the generative model. In the first two use cases, the generative models worked together with downstream predictive models. In the third use case, the generative models made the predictions themselves. The studies within data augmentation either fell into the area of compensation for class imbalances by producing additional synthetic cases or imputation of missing values. Overall, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) was the most frequently used technology (8/22 studies; 36%), followed by Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) (7/22 studies; 32%). All publications except one were from the last four years. This review shows that generative AI has immense potential in the future, and continuous monitoring of new technologies is necessary to ensure that patients receive the best possible care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1633458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1633458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When a patient survives the first 24 h in intensive care, outcome prediction is crucial for further treatment decisions. As recent advances have shown that Artificial Intelligence (AI) outperforms clinicians in prognostication, and especially generative AI has developed rapidly in the past ten years, this scoping review aimed to explore the use of generative AI models for outcome prediction in intensive care medicine. Of the 481 records found in the search, 119 studies were subjected to abstract screening and, when necessary, full-text review for eligibility assessment. Twenty-two studies and two review articles were finally included. The studies were categorized into three prototypical use cases for generative AI in outcome prediction in intensive care: (i) data augmentation, (ii) feature generation from unstructured data, and (iii) prediction by the generative model. In the first two use cases, the generative models worked together with downstream predictive models. In the third use case, the generative models made the predictions themselves. The studies within data augmentation either fell into the area of compensation for class imbalances by producing additional synthetic cases or imputation of missing values. Overall, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) was the most frequently used technology (8/22 studies; 36%), followed by Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) (7/22 studies; 32%). All publications except one were from the last four years. This review shows that generative AI has immense potential in the future, and continuous monitoring of new technologies is necessary to ensure that patients receive the best possible care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生成式人工智能在重症监护医学结果预测中的应用综述
当患者在重症监护中存活24小时时,预后预测对进一步的治疗决策至关重要。由于最近的进展表明人工智能(AI)在预测方面优于临床医生,特别是生成式人工智能在过去十年中发展迅速,本综述旨在探讨在重症监护医学中使用生成式人工智能模型进行结果预测。在检索到的481条记录中,有119项研究进行了摘要筛选,必要时进行了全文审查,以进行资格评估。最终纳入22项研究和2篇综述文章。这些研究被分为三个原型用例,用于生成AI在重症监护结果预测中:(i)数据增强,(ii)从非结构化数据生成特征,以及(iii)生成模型预测。在前两个用例中,生成模型与下游预测模型一起工作。在第三个用例中,生成模型自己做出预测。数据扩充中的研究要么是通过产生额外的合成案例来补偿阶级不平衡的领域,要么是对缺失值的推测。总体而言,生成式对抗网络(GAN)是最常用的技术(8/22项研究;36%),其次是生成式预训练变压器(GPT)(7/22项研究;32%)。除了一本以外,所有出版物都是最近四年出版的。这篇综述表明,生成式人工智能在未来具有巨大的潜力,持续监测新技术是必要的,以确保患者得到最好的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信