Social determinants of health and health-related quality of life in individuals with isolated dystonia.

Dystonia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.3389/dyst.2025.13711
Caroline Nelson, Christopher D Stephen, Ellen B Penney, Hang Lee, Elyse R Park, Nutan Sharma, Marisela E Dy-Hollins
{"title":"Social determinants of health and health-related quality of life in individuals with isolated dystonia.","authors":"Caroline Nelson, Christopher D Stephen, Ellen B Penney, Hang Lee, Elyse R Park, Nutan Sharma, Marisela E Dy-Hollins","doi":"10.3389/dyst.2025.13711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dystonia is the third most common movement disorder. Motor and non-motor manifestations of dystonia may impact Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), with lower HRQoL scores compared to the healthy population. People with generalized dystonia report worse HRQoL scores (vs. people with focal distributions). Social determinants of health (SDOH) may play a role in HRQoL outcomes in dystonia, but scant data exists. We aimed to examine differences in HRQoL scores in people with focal vs. non-focal (e.g., segmental, multifocal, generalized) dystonia and the association with SDOH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>129 participants with isolated dystonia, who were recruited through Mass General Brigham movement disorders clinic and enrolled in the Dystonia Partners Research Bank, completed a follow-up survey on SDOH and HRQoL: Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Version 2.0 Short Form (Neuro- QoL-SF) and the EuroGroup 5-level (Euro-QoL). Linear regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with isolated dystonia were predominantly female (72.1%), non-Hispanic white (79.8%), and highly educated (79.8%; ≥ bachelor's degree). 71.3% of the participants had focal dystonia and 28.7% of the participants had non-focal dystonia. Participants with focal dystonia (vs. non-focal dystonia) reported older age at diagnosis (49.2 ± 11.7 vs. 40.6 ± 19.2, p = 0.004). Participants with focal dystonia (vs. non-focal dystonia) reported higher (i.e., better) overall health scores (80.4 ± 13.9 vs. 72.8 ± 13.5, p = 0.005), higher ability to participate in social activities (51.3 ± 7.7 vs. 47.2 ± 6.0, p = 0.003), lower fatigue (44.7 ± 8.4 vs. 49.8 ± 7.2, p = 0.001), and lower sleep disturbance (48.0 ± 8.2 vs. 53.0 ± 7.9, p = 0.002). Independent predictors of higher overall health ratings included focal distribution of dystonia (b = 7.5; p = 0.01), a higher level of education (b = 9.2; p = 0.04) and not having a mental health diagnosis (b = 7.5; p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with focal dystonia were diagnosed later and had higher (i.e., better) HRQoL measures vs. participants with non-focal dystonia. Predictors of better HRQoL were having focal dystonia and higher level of education, whereas the presence of a mental health diagnosis was associated with lower HRQoL (i.e., worse) scores. SDOH such as employment status, medical literacy, and ability to afford basic needs may influence HRQoL ratings for participants with isolated dystonia. Our findings may not be generalizable to the general population of patients with isolated dystonia. We highlight areas for further research and development.</p>","PeriodicalId":72853,"journal":{"name":"Dystonia","volume":"4 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dystonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/dyst.2025.13711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Dystonia is the third most common movement disorder. Motor and non-motor manifestations of dystonia may impact Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), with lower HRQoL scores compared to the healthy population. People with generalized dystonia report worse HRQoL scores (vs. people with focal distributions). Social determinants of health (SDOH) may play a role in HRQoL outcomes in dystonia, but scant data exists. We aimed to examine differences in HRQoL scores in people with focal vs. non-focal (e.g., segmental, multifocal, generalized) dystonia and the association with SDOH.

Methods: 129 participants with isolated dystonia, who were recruited through Mass General Brigham movement disorders clinic and enrolled in the Dystonia Partners Research Bank, completed a follow-up survey on SDOH and HRQoL: Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Version 2.0 Short Form (Neuro- QoL-SF) and the EuroGroup 5-level (Euro-QoL). Linear regression analyses were performed.

Results: Participants with isolated dystonia were predominantly female (72.1%), non-Hispanic white (79.8%), and highly educated (79.8%; ≥ bachelor's degree). 71.3% of the participants had focal dystonia and 28.7% of the participants had non-focal dystonia. Participants with focal dystonia (vs. non-focal dystonia) reported older age at diagnosis (49.2 ± 11.7 vs. 40.6 ± 19.2, p = 0.004). Participants with focal dystonia (vs. non-focal dystonia) reported higher (i.e., better) overall health scores (80.4 ± 13.9 vs. 72.8 ± 13.5, p = 0.005), higher ability to participate in social activities (51.3 ± 7.7 vs. 47.2 ± 6.0, p = 0.003), lower fatigue (44.7 ± 8.4 vs. 49.8 ± 7.2, p = 0.001), and lower sleep disturbance (48.0 ± 8.2 vs. 53.0 ± 7.9, p = 0.002). Independent predictors of higher overall health ratings included focal distribution of dystonia (b = 7.5; p = 0.01), a higher level of education (b = 9.2; p = 0.04) and not having a mental health diagnosis (b = 7.5; p = 0.01).

Conclusion: Participants with focal dystonia were diagnosed later and had higher (i.e., better) HRQoL measures vs. participants with non-focal dystonia. Predictors of better HRQoL were having focal dystonia and higher level of education, whereas the presence of a mental health diagnosis was associated with lower HRQoL (i.e., worse) scores. SDOH such as employment status, medical literacy, and ability to afford basic needs may influence HRQoL ratings for participants with isolated dystonia. Our findings may not be generalizable to the general population of patients with isolated dystonia. We highlight areas for further research and development.

孤立性肌张力障碍患者健康和健康相关生活质量的社会决定因素
背景和目的:肌张力障碍是第三大常见的运动障碍。肌张力障碍的运动和非运动表现可能影响健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),与健康人群相比,HRQoL得分较低。广泛性肌张力障碍患者报告的HRQoL评分较差(与局灶性分布患者相比)。健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)可能在肌张力障碍患者的HRQoL结果中发挥作用,但缺乏相关数据。我们的目的是研究局灶性与非局灶性(如节段性、多局灶性、全身性)肌张力障碍患者HRQoL评分的差异及其与SDOH的关系。方法:通过麻省总医院布里格姆运动障碍诊所招募并纳入肌张力障碍伙伴研究银行的129例孤立性肌张力障碍患者,完成了SDOH和HRQoL的随访调查:神经系统疾病生活质量2.0版简式(Neuro- QoL-SF)和EuroGroup 5级(Euro-QoL)。进行线性回归分析。结果:孤立性肌张力障碍的参与者主要是女性(72.1%)、非西班牙裔白人(79.8%)和高学历(79.8%;≥学士学位)。71.3%的参与者有局灶性肌张力障碍,28.7%的参与者有非局灶性肌张力障碍。局灶性肌张力障碍(与非局灶性肌张力障碍相比)的参与者在诊断时的年龄更大(49.2±11.7比40.6±19.2,p = 0.004)。局灶性肌张力障碍(与非局灶性肌张力障碍相比)的参与者报告了更高(即更好)的总体健康评分(80.4±13.9比72.8±13.5,p = 0.005),更高的参与社交活动的能力(51.3±7.7比47.2±6.0,p = 0.003),更低的疲劳(44.7±8.4比49.8±7.2,p = 0.001),更低的睡眠障碍(48.0±8.2比53.0±7.9,p = 0.002)。整体健康评分较高的独立预测因素包括肌张力障碍的局灶性分布(b = 7.5; p = 0.01)、较高的教育水平(b = 9.2; p = 0.04)和没有精神健康诊断(b = 7.5; p = 0.01)。结论:与非局灶性肌张力障碍患者相比,局灶性肌张力障碍患者诊断较晚,HRQoL测量值较高(即更好)。较好的HRQoL的预测因素是局灶性肌张力障碍和较高的教育水平,而心理健康诊断的存在与较低的HRQoL(即较差)得分相关。SDOH如就业状况、医学素养和支付基本需求的能力可能会影响孤立性肌张力障碍参与者的HRQoL评分。我们的发现可能不能推广到孤立性肌张力障碍患者的一般人群。我们强调需要进一步研究和发展的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信