Short Stem vs. Standard Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Perioperative Prospective Invasiveness Study with Serum Markers.

IF 3 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Marco Senarighi, Carlo Ciccullo, Luca de Berardinis, Leonard Meco, Nicola Giampaolini, Simone Domenico Aspriello, Luca Farinelli, Antonio Pompilio Gigante
{"title":"Short Stem vs. Standard Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Perioperative Prospective Invasiveness Study with Serum Markers.","authors":"Marco Senarighi, Carlo Ciccullo, Luca de Berardinis, Leonard Meco, Nicola Giampaolini, Simone Domenico Aspriello, Luca Farinelli, Antonio Pompilio Gigante","doi":"10.3390/diseases13080233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-established surgical procedure for end-stage hip arthrosis. Innovations such as minimally invasive approaches and new technologies have improved outcomes and reduced invasiveness. The introduction of short-stem prostheses, which offer potential benefits in bone preservation, has been a significant development in recent years. This prospective case series study aims to compare invasiveness of the short-stem (SS) and conventional-stem (CS) prostheses in THA with a posterolateral approach (PLA) by assessing perioperative serum markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective case series was conducted involving consecutive patients who underwent primary THA from January 2022 to December 2023. Demographics and preoperative, postoperative day 1 (POD1), and postoperative day 2 (POD2) serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), and white blood cells (WBCs) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 21 patients with CS and 19 with SS, with no significant differences between groups in demographic. No statistically significant differences were found in serum markers between SS and CS groups at any time point. Both groups showed significant increases in ESR, CRP, and PCT from preoperative levels to POD2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while WBC values increased from preoperative to POD1 but decreased between POD1 and POD2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The short-stem prosthesis does not exhibit significantly different perioperative serum marker profiles compared to the conventional stem, suggesting similar levels of surgical invasiveness between the two implants. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and explore other aspects of short-stem THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13080233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-established surgical procedure for end-stage hip arthrosis. Innovations such as minimally invasive approaches and new technologies have improved outcomes and reduced invasiveness. The introduction of short-stem prostheses, which offer potential benefits in bone preservation, has been a significant development in recent years. This prospective case series study aims to compare invasiveness of the short-stem (SS) and conventional-stem (CS) prostheses in THA with a posterolateral approach (PLA) by assessing perioperative serum markers.

Methods: A prospective case series was conducted involving consecutive patients who underwent primary THA from January 2022 to December 2023. Demographics and preoperative, postoperative day 1 (POD1), and postoperative day 2 (POD2) serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), and white blood cells (WBCs) were measured.

Results: The study included 21 patients with CS and 19 with SS, with no significant differences between groups in demographic. No statistically significant differences were found in serum markers between SS and CS groups at any time point. Both groups showed significant increases in ESR, CRP, and PCT from preoperative levels to POD2 (p < 0.001), while WBC values increased from preoperative to POD1 but decreased between POD1 and POD2.

Conclusion: The short-stem prosthesis does not exhibit significantly different perioperative serum marker profiles compared to the conventional stem, suggesting similar levels of surgical invasiveness between the two implants. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and explore other aspects of short-stem THA.

短杆与标准杆在初次全髋关节置换术中的应用:一项血清标志物围手术期前瞻性侵入性研究。
背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)是一种成熟的治疗终末期髋关节的手术方法。诸如微创方法和新技术等创新改善了结果并减少了侵入性。近年来,短柄假体的引入,在骨保存方面提供了潜在的好处,已经取得了重大进展。本前瞻性病例系列研究旨在通过评估围手术期血清标志物,比较THA后外侧入路(PLA)短柄(SS)和常规柄(CS)假体的侵袭性。方法:对2022年1月至2023年12月连续接受原发性THA的患者进行前瞻性病例系列研究。测定人口统计学指标及术前、术后第1天(POD1)和术后第2天(POD2)血清c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞(wbc)水平。结果:本研究纳入21例CS患者和19例SS患者,组间人口统计学差异无统计学意义。SS组与CS组血清标志物各时间点差异均无统计学意义。两组患者的ESR、CRP和PCT均较术前至POD2水平显著升高(p < 0.001),而WBC值从术前至POD1水平升高,但在POD1和POD2之间下降。结论:与传统假体相比,短柄假体围手术期血清标志物特征没有明显差异,这表明两种假体的手术侵入性水平相似。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来验证这些发现,并探索短茎全髋关节置换术的其他方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信