Spatial and policy analysis of livability in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Ana Luiza Favarão Leão, Milena Franco Silva, Raúl D Gierbolini-Rivera, Courtney Shaw, Áine O'Connor, Eugen Resendiz B, Melanie Lowe, Deborah Salvo, Rodrigo Siqueira Reis
{"title":"Spatial and policy analysis of livability in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, USA.","authors":"Ana Luiza Favarão Leão, Milena Franco Silva, Raúl D Gierbolini-Rivera, Courtney Shaw, Áine O'Connor, Eugen Resendiz B, Melanie Lowe, Deborah Salvo, Rodrigo Siqueira Reis","doi":"10.1080/23748834.2025.2526258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A livable city ensures safety, health, inclusivity, sustainability, housing, mobility, and opportunities for all. The Global Observatory of Healthy and Sustainable Cities (GOHSC) launched the 1000 Cities Challenge to assess urban health and sustainability globally. This study uses the GOHSC's spatial and policy indicators to evaluate livability in St. Louis, Missouri. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed the spatial distribution of built environment and transport features alongside planning and sustainability policies. Spatial indicators were derived from open data. Policy documents were coded for their governance level, alignment with evidence from healthy cities, and inclusion of measurable targets. Most residents (91.7%) lived in neighborhoods with optimal street intersection density (100 intersections/km<sup>2</sup>). However, only 2.8% lived in areas with optimal population density (5,700 people/km<sup>2</sup>). Just 26.3% lived near public transit, and 44.5% had access to large public open spaces below the GOHSC city averages (44.6% and 66%). While there was good coverage of policies, policy quality was low (31%), with most lacking measurable targets. The policy and spatial indicators enabled a comprehensive evaluation of livability. Future research should synthesize local and regional policies, supplement livability indicators with measures of environmental (in)justice within cities and utilize streetscape micro-scale data to deepen livability analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72596,"journal":{"name":"Cities & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2025.2526258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A livable city ensures safety, health, inclusivity, sustainability, housing, mobility, and opportunities for all. The Global Observatory of Healthy and Sustainable Cities (GOHSC) launched the 1000 Cities Challenge to assess urban health and sustainability globally. This study uses the GOHSC's spatial and policy indicators to evaluate livability in St. Louis, Missouri. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed the spatial distribution of built environment and transport features alongside planning and sustainability policies. Spatial indicators were derived from open data. Policy documents were coded for their governance level, alignment with evidence from healthy cities, and inclusion of measurable targets. Most residents (91.7%) lived in neighborhoods with optimal street intersection density (100 intersections/km2). However, only 2.8% lived in areas with optimal population density (5,700 people/km2). Just 26.3% lived near public transit, and 44.5% had access to large public open spaces below the GOHSC city averages (44.6% and 66%). While there was good coverage of policies, policy quality was low (31%), with most lacking measurable targets. The policy and spatial indicators enabled a comprehensive evaluation of livability. Future research should synthesize local and regional policies, supplement livability indicators with measures of environmental (in)justice within cities and utilize streetscape micro-scale data to deepen livability analysis.

美国密苏里州圣路易斯市宜居性空间与政策分析
宜居城市确保所有人的安全、健康、包容性、可持续性、住房、流动性和机会。全球健康和可持续城市观察站(GOHSC)发起了1000个城市挑战,以评估全球的城市健康和可持续性。本研究使用GOHSC的空间和政策指标来评估密苏里州圣路易斯市的宜居性。采用混合方法,我们分析了建筑环境和交通特征的空间分布以及规划和可持续性政策。空间指标来源于公开数据。政策文件根据其治理水平、与健康城市证据的一致性以及纳入可衡量目标进行编码。大多数居民(91.7%)居住在十字路口密度最优的街区(100个十字路口/km2)。然而,只有2.8%的人居住在最佳人口密度(5700人/平方公里)的地区。只有26.3%的人住在公共交通附近,44.5%的人可以进入大型公共开放空间,低于GOHSC城市平均水平(44.6%和66%)。虽然政策覆盖面很好,但政策质量较低(31%),大多数政策缺乏可衡量的目标。政策和空间指标使宜居性得到全面评价。未来的研究应综合地方和区域政策,在宜居性指标的基础上补充城市环境正义指标,并利用微尺度街景数据深化宜居性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信