[Gene therapy methods for rare ophthalmological diseases in the light of distributional justice-An overview].

IF 0.6
Carsten Fluck
{"title":"[Gene therapy methods for rare ophthalmological diseases in the light of distributional justice-An overview].","authors":"Carsten Fluck","doi":"10.1007/s00347-025-02308-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gene therapies offer promising approaches for the treatment of genetic diseases. With the approval of Neparvovec (Luxturna®, Novartis) in 2018, a gene therapy for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amaurosis in RPE65 mutations, this innovation has also reached ophthalmology practice. Despite their potential, gene therapies raise significant ethical and economic issues, particularly with regard to distributive justice, which could limit access and increase inequalities.</p><p><strong>Aim of the paper: </strong>This article examines distributive justice from an ethical perspective, focusing on the just rationing of health resources and the affordability of gene therapies for rare diseases. The aim is to highlight areas of tension between ethical demands, economic interests and the financial sustainability of the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selected literature will be reviewed to shed light on the distribution of scarce healthcare resources, potential financing models and the evaluation of appropriate pricing. In addition, challenges specific to ophthalmology are addressed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pay-for-performance models link costs to effectiveness, but do not address all challenges. Centralized data collection and negotiation structures increase efficiency and strengthen the position vis-à-vis manufacturers, while fund models such as the HIF promote the predictability of healthcare expenditure. In ophthalmology, questions arise regarding the prioritization of patient groups, intervention thresholds and the distribution of scarce resources, for example when treating the second eye after successful treatment of the first.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-025-02308-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gene therapies offer promising approaches for the treatment of genetic diseases. With the approval of Neparvovec (Luxturna®, Novartis) in 2018, a gene therapy for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amaurosis in RPE65 mutations, this innovation has also reached ophthalmology practice. Despite their potential, gene therapies raise significant ethical and economic issues, particularly with regard to distributive justice, which could limit access and increase inequalities.

Aim of the paper: This article examines distributive justice from an ethical perspective, focusing on the just rationing of health resources and the affordability of gene therapies for rare diseases. The aim is to highlight areas of tension between ethical demands, economic interests and the financial sustainability of the healthcare system.

Methods: Selected literature will be reviewed to shed light on the distribution of scarce healthcare resources, potential financing models and the evaluation of appropriate pricing. In addition, challenges specific to ophthalmology are addressed.

Results: Pay-for-performance models link costs to effectiveness, but do not address all challenges. Centralized data collection and negotiation structures increase efficiency and strengthen the position vis-à-vis manufacturers, while fund models such as the HIF promote the predictability of healthcare expenditure. In ophthalmology, questions arise regarding the prioritization of patient groups, intervention thresholds and the distribution of scarce resources, for example when treating the second eye after successful treatment of the first.

【从分配公平的角度看眼科罕见病的基因治疗方法——综述】。
背景:基因疗法为遗传性疾病的治疗提供了有希望的途径。随着2018年Neparvovec (Luxturna®,Novartis)获批用于治疗RPE65突变视网膜色素变性和Leber先天性黑朦的基因疗法,这一创新也进入了眼科实践。尽管有潜力,基因疗法引起了重大的伦理和经济问题,特别是在分配正义方面,这可能限制获取和增加不平等。本文从伦理的角度考察了分配正义,重点是卫生资源的公平配给和罕见病基因治疗的可负担性。其目的是强调道德要求、经济利益和医疗保健系统的财务可持续性之间的紧张关系。方法:对选定的文献进行回顾,以阐明稀缺医疗资源的分布、潜在的融资模式和适当定价的评估。此外,挑战具体到眼科解决。结果:按绩效付费模式将成本与效果联系起来,但并不能解决所有的挑战。集中的数据收集和谈判结构提高了效率,并加强了对-à-vis制造商的地位,而HIF等基金模型促进了医疗保健支出的可预测性。在眼科学中,出现了关于患者群体优先排序、干预阈值和稀缺资源分配的问题,例如在第一只眼治疗成功后治疗第二只眼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信