Infant Feeding Practices and Their Association with Early-Life Nutrient Intake: Baseline Findings from the Baby-Act Trial.

Dietetics (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.3390/dietetics4020015
Cristina Palacios, Elvira Alvarez, Maria Gabriela Kallis, Yari Valle, Jeremy Pomeroy, Maribel Campos
{"title":"Infant Feeding Practices and Their Association with Early-Life Nutrient Intake: Baseline Findings from the Baby-Act Trial.","authors":"Cristina Palacios, Elvira Alvarez, Maria Gabriela Kallis, Yari Valle, Jeremy Pomeroy, Maribel Campos","doi":"10.3390/dietetics4020015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is a secondary cross-sectional analysis of participants' baseline data from the Baby-Act Trial to compare energy and macronutrients intake by feeding type. This was a cluster-randomized clinical trial among pregnant women and their infants participating in the Puerto Rico WIC program to test the clinical effectiveness of an intervention that addressed various infant obesity risk factors during the first year of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed at baseline a sociodemographic questionnaire and a validated infant food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The FFQ was analyzed for type of feeding (exclusively fed breastmilk, fed breastmilk and formula, or exclusively fed infant formula) and for energy and macronutrient intake (protein, carbohydrate, and fat). Analysis of covariance was used to compare intake type of feeding, adjusting for maternal age. race, education, number of previous children, gestational length, and pre-pregnancy BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present analysis included 368 mother-infant pairs. Mean age of mothers was 26.7 years and of infants 0.7 months. Ten infants fed complementary foods were removed from the analyses. A total of 39.9% of infants were exclusively breastmilk-fed, 47.2% were fed breastmilk and infant formula, and 12.8% were exclusively formula-fed (n = 358). Intake of energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrates was significantly lower in infants fed only breastmilk compared to infants fed a combination of breastmilk and infant formula, and intake of protein and carbohydrates were lower in infants fed a combination of breastmilk and infant formula compared to infants fed only infant formula, after adjusting for important confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Very early infant feeding practices are associated with differences in dietary intake. The long-term health implications of this findings need to be further studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":72810,"journal":{"name":"Dietetics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dietetics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dietetics4020015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This is a secondary cross-sectional analysis of participants' baseline data from the Baby-Act Trial to compare energy and macronutrients intake by feeding type. This was a cluster-randomized clinical trial among pregnant women and their infants participating in the Puerto Rico WIC program to test the clinical effectiveness of an intervention that addressed various infant obesity risk factors during the first year of life.

Methods: Participants completed at baseline a sociodemographic questionnaire and a validated infant food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The FFQ was analyzed for type of feeding (exclusively fed breastmilk, fed breastmilk and formula, or exclusively fed infant formula) and for energy and macronutrient intake (protein, carbohydrate, and fat). Analysis of covariance was used to compare intake type of feeding, adjusting for maternal age. race, education, number of previous children, gestational length, and pre-pregnancy BMI.

Results: The present analysis included 368 mother-infant pairs. Mean age of mothers was 26.7 years and of infants 0.7 months. Ten infants fed complementary foods were removed from the analyses. A total of 39.9% of infants were exclusively breastmilk-fed, 47.2% were fed breastmilk and infant formula, and 12.8% were exclusively formula-fed (n = 358). Intake of energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrates was significantly lower in infants fed only breastmilk compared to infants fed a combination of breastmilk and infant formula, and intake of protein and carbohydrates were lower in infants fed a combination of breastmilk and infant formula compared to infants fed only infant formula, after adjusting for important confounders.

Conclusions: Very early infant feeding practices are associated with differences in dietary intake. The long-term health implications of this findings need to be further studied.

婴儿喂养方法及其与生命早期营养摄入的关系:来自婴儿行为试验的基线结果。
这是对婴儿法案试验参与者基线数据的二次横断面分析,以比较不同喂养类型的能量和宏量营养素摄入量。这是一项在波多黎各WIC项目的孕妇和她们的婴儿中进行的集群随机临床试验,以测试一种干预措施的临床有效性,该干预措施解决了婴儿生命第一年的各种肥胖风险因素。方法:参与者在基线时完成社会人口调查问卷和有效的婴儿食物频率调查问卷(FFQ)。分析FFQ的喂养类型(纯母乳喂养、纯母乳加配方奶喂养或纯婴儿配方奶喂养)以及能量和常量营养素摄入量(蛋白质、碳水化合物和脂肪)。采用协方差分析比较摄食类型,调整母亲年龄。种族、受教育程度、以前孩子的数量、妊娠长度和孕前BMI。结果:本分析包括368对母婴。母亲的平均年龄为26.7岁,婴儿为0.7个月。10名喂养辅食的婴儿被从分析中剔除。39.9%的婴儿为纯母乳喂养,47.2%的婴儿为母乳和婴儿配方奶粉喂养,12.8%的婴儿为纯配方奶粉喂养(n = 358)。在调整了重要的混杂因素后,纯母乳喂养的婴儿的能量、蛋白质、脂肪和碳水化合物的摄入量明显低于母乳和婴儿配方奶混合喂养的婴儿,而纯母乳和婴儿配方奶混合喂养的婴儿的蛋白质和碳水化合物摄入量也低于纯婴儿配方奶。结论:婴幼儿早期喂养方式与饮食摄入差异有关。这一发现对健康的长期影响需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信