Xi Cheng, Sujith Swarna, Jermaine Robertson, Nathaniel A Cleri, Jordan R Saadon, Chiemeka Uwakwe, Yindong Hua, Seyed Morsal Mosallami Aghili, Cassie Wang, Robert S Kleyner, Xuwen Zheng, Ariana Forohar, John Servider, Kurt Butler, Chao Chen, Jordane Dimidschstein, Petar M Djurić, Charles B Mikell, Sima Mofakham
{"title":"Computer vision detects covert voluntary facial movements in unresponsive brain injury patients.","authors":"Xi Cheng, Sujith Swarna, Jermaine Robertson, Nathaniel A Cleri, Jordan R Saadon, Chiemeka Uwakwe, Yindong Hua, Seyed Morsal Mosallami Aghili, Cassie Wang, Robert S Kleyner, Xuwen Zheng, Ariana Forohar, John Servider, Kurt Butler, Chao Chen, Jordane Dimidschstein, Petar M Djurić, Charles B Mikell, Sima Mofakham","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-01042-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many brain injury patients who appear unresponsive retain subtle, purposeful motor behaviors, signaling capacity for recovery. We hypothesized that low-amplitude movements precede larger-amplitude voluntary movements detectable by clinicians after acute brain injury. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel, as far as we are aware, computer vision-based tool (SeeMe) that detects and quantifies low-amplitude facial movements in response to auditory commands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 16 healthy volunteers and 37 comatose acute brain injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) aged 18-85 with no prior neurological diagnoses. We measured facial movements to command assessed using SeeMe and compared them to clinicians' exams. The primary outcome was the detection of facial movement in response to auditory commands. To assess comprehension, we tested whether movements were specific to command type (i.e., eye-opening to open your eyes and not stick out your tongue) with a machine learning-based classifier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here we show that SeeMe detects eye-opening in comatose patients 4.1 days earlier than clinicians. SeeMe also detects eye-opening in more comatose patients (30/36, 85.7%) than clinical examination (25/36, 71.4%). In patients without an obscuring endotracheal tube, SeeMe detects mouth movements in 16/17 (94.1%) patients. The amplitude and number of SeeMe-detected responses correlate with clinical outcome at discharge. Using our classifier, eye-opening is specific (81%) to the command open your eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute brain injury patients have low-amplitude movements before overt movements. Thus, many covertly conscious patients may have motor behavior currently undetected by clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01042-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many brain injury patients who appear unresponsive retain subtle, purposeful motor behaviors, signaling capacity for recovery. We hypothesized that low-amplitude movements precede larger-amplitude voluntary movements detectable by clinicians after acute brain injury. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel, as far as we are aware, computer vision-based tool (SeeMe) that detects and quantifies low-amplitude facial movements in response to auditory commands.
Methods: We enrolled 16 healthy volunteers and 37 comatose acute brain injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) aged 18-85 with no prior neurological diagnoses. We measured facial movements to command assessed using SeeMe and compared them to clinicians' exams. The primary outcome was the detection of facial movement in response to auditory commands. To assess comprehension, we tested whether movements were specific to command type (i.e., eye-opening to open your eyes and not stick out your tongue) with a machine learning-based classifier.
Results: Here we show that SeeMe detects eye-opening in comatose patients 4.1 days earlier than clinicians. SeeMe also detects eye-opening in more comatose patients (30/36, 85.7%) than clinical examination (25/36, 71.4%). In patients without an obscuring endotracheal tube, SeeMe detects mouth movements in 16/17 (94.1%) patients. The amplitude and number of SeeMe-detected responses correlate with clinical outcome at discharge. Using our classifier, eye-opening is specific (81%) to the command open your eyes.
Conclusion: Acute brain injury patients have low-amplitude movements before overt movements. Thus, many covertly conscious patients may have motor behavior currently undetected by clinicians.
背景:许多表现为无反应的脑损伤患者保留了细微的、有目的的运动行为,这是恢复能力的信号。我们假设,临床医生在急性脑损伤后检测到的低幅度运动先于较大幅度的自主运动。为了验证这一假设,我们开发了一种新颖的,据我们所知,基于计算机视觉的工具(SeeMe),可以检测和量化响应听觉命令的低幅度面部运动。方法:我们招募了16名健康志愿者和37名18-85岁无神经学诊断的昏迷急性脑损伤患者(格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8)。我们用SeeMe测量面部运动,并将其与临床医生的检查结果进行比较。主要结果是检测面部运动对听觉命令的反应。为了评估理解能力,我们使用基于机器学习的分类器测试了动作是否特定于命令类型(即睁开眼睛而不是伸出舌头)。结果:在这里,我们发现SeeMe比临床医生早4.1天检测到昏迷患者的睁眼。在昏迷患者中,SeeMe检测到睁眼的比例(30/36,85.7%)高于临床检查(25/36,71.4%)。在没有隐匿气管内管的患者中,有16/17(94.1%)患者的SeeMe检测到口腔运动。检测到的seeme反应的幅度和数量与出院时的临床结果相关。使用我们的分类器,eye-opening是特定于命令open your eyes的(81%)。结论:急性脑损伤患者在明显运动前存在低幅度运动。因此,许多隐晦意识的患者可能有目前未被临床医生发现的运动行为。