Understanding the Dementia Care Triad: Findings From a Longitudinal Qualitative Study With People Living With Dementia, Their Carers, and Their Healthcare Professionals.

IF 2.2
Remco Tuijt, Jill Manthorpe, Greta Rait, Rachael Frost, Jane Wilcock, Kate Walters
{"title":"Understanding the Dementia Care Triad: Findings From a Longitudinal Qualitative Study With People Living With Dementia, Their Carers, and Their Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Remco Tuijt, Jill Manthorpe, Greta Rait, Rachael Frost, Jane Wilcock, Kate Walters","doi":"10.1177/14713012251372224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Best healthcare practice for people with dementia encourages the inclusion of family members or carers, alongside enabling people with dementia to make their own decisions. Dementia care thus often includes the person with dementia, their carer, and their healthcare professional (HCP): a dementia care triad. Understanding how this triad is developed and navigated may improve future dementia care services. <b>Methods:</b> A longitudinal qualitative approach was used to interview 30 people with dementia, 31 family carers, and 7 healthcare professionals in England between May 2020 and March 2021. Data from three interview time points were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. <b>Findings:</b> The relationships within a dementia care triad were initially built on the dyadic relationship between the person with dementia and their family carer and any pre-existing relationships with their HCP. The nature and proximity of the carer to the person with dementia influenced how triadic relationships in dementia care formed and functioned, with spousal and co-resident carers more actively involved in healthcare interactions. Further positive development of a triad required confidence in the HCP, and shared perspectives on balancing the involvement of the carer and the independence of the person with dementia, with considerations of autonomy and risk, and which did not always follow a linear transition. While increased carer involvement often supported the person with dementia, it sometimes led to their exclusion. Engagement by healthcare professionals varied, reflecting inconsistencies in applying person-centred care. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this study suggest a need for clearer, more consistent approaches that support dynamic carer roles while preserving the autonomy of the person with dementia. This study provides additional considerations in relationship dynamics that inform our understanding of the dementia care triad.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251372224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251372224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Best healthcare practice for people with dementia encourages the inclusion of family members or carers, alongside enabling people with dementia to make their own decisions. Dementia care thus often includes the person with dementia, their carer, and their healthcare professional (HCP): a dementia care triad. Understanding how this triad is developed and navigated may improve future dementia care services. Methods: A longitudinal qualitative approach was used to interview 30 people with dementia, 31 family carers, and 7 healthcare professionals in England between May 2020 and March 2021. Data from three interview time points were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings: The relationships within a dementia care triad were initially built on the dyadic relationship between the person with dementia and their family carer and any pre-existing relationships with their HCP. The nature and proximity of the carer to the person with dementia influenced how triadic relationships in dementia care formed and functioned, with spousal and co-resident carers more actively involved in healthcare interactions. Further positive development of a triad required confidence in the HCP, and shared perspectives on balancing the involvement of the carer and the independence of the person with dementia, with considerations of autonomy and risk, and which did not always follow a linear transition. While increased carer involvement often supported the person with dementia, it sometimes led to their exclusion. Engagement by healthcare professionals varied, reflecting inconsistencies in applying person-centred care. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest a need for clearer, more consistent approaches that support dynamic carer roles while preserving the autonomy of the person with dementia. This study provides additional considerations in relationship dynamics that inform our understanding of the dementia care triad.

了解痴呆症护理三位一体:一项对痴呆症患者、他们的护理人员和他们的医疗保健专业人员进行的纵向定性研究的结果。
背景:痴呆症患者的最佳医疗保健实践鼓励包括家庭成员或护理人员,同时使痴呆症患者能够自己做出决定。因此,痴呆症护理通常包括痴呆症患者、他们的护理人员和他们的医疗保健专业人员(HCP):痴呆症护理三位一体。了解这三个因素是如何发展和导航的,可能会改善未来的痴呆症护理服务。方法:采用纵向定性方法,于2020年5月至2021年3月期间在英格兰采访了30名痴呆症患者、31名家庭护理人员和7名医疗保健专业人员。来自三个采访时间点的数据被转录并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。研究结果:痴呆护理三位一体中的关系最初建立在痴呆患者与其家庭护理者之间的二元关系以及与其HCP之间的任何预先存在的关系上。护理人员与痴呆症患者的性质和接近程度影响痴呆症护理中三位一体关系的形成和运作,配偶和共同住院护理人员更积极地参与医疗保健互动。三合一的进一步积极发展需要对HCP有信心,并在平衡照顾者的参与和痴呆症患者的独立性方面分享观点,考虑到自主性和风险,这并不总是遵循线性过渡。虽然更多的照顾者参与通常会支持痴呆症患者,但有时也会导致他们被排斥。医疗保健专业人员的参与各不相同,反映了在应用以人为本的护理方面的不一致。结论:这项研究的发现表明,需要更清晰、更一致的方法来支持动态护理角色,同时保持痴呆症患者的自主性。这项研究提供了额外的考虑,在关系动力学,告知我们的理解痴呆护理三位一体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信