Predictive computational framework to provide a digital twin for personalized cardiovascular medicine.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mengzhe Lyu, Ryo Torii, Ce Liang, Xuehuan Zhang, Xifu Wang, Qiaoqiao Li, Yiannis Ventikos, Duanduan Chen
{"title":"Predictive computational framework to provide a digital twin for personalized cardiovascular medicine.","authors":"Mengzhe Lyu, Ryo Torii, Ce Liang, Xuehuan Zhang, Xifu Wang, Qiaoqiao Li, Yiannis Ventikos, Duanduan Chen","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-01055-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the ability to predict post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and stented vessel informs procedural planning. However, highly precise and effective methods to quantitatively simulate coronary intervention are lacking. This study developed and validated a virtual coronary intervention (VCI) technique for non-invasive physiological and anatomical assessment of PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, patients with substantial lesions (pre-PCI CT-FFR of less than 0.80) were enrolled. VCI framework was used to predict vessel reshape and post-PCI CT-FFR. The accuracy of predicted post-VCI CT-FFR, luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) and centreline curvature was validated with post-PCI computed tomography (CT) angiography datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 30 patients are initially screened; 21 meet the inclusion criteria, and 9 patients (9 vessels) are included in the final analysis. The average PCI-simulation time is 24.92 ± 1.00 s on a single processor. The calculated post-PCI CT-FFR is 0.92 ± 0.09, whereas the predicted post-VCI CT-FFR is 0.90 ± 0.08 (mean difference: -0.02 ± 0.05 FFR units; limits of agreement: -0.08 to 0.05). Morphologically, the predicted CSA is 16.36 ± 4.41 mm² and the post-CSA is 17.91 ± 4.84 mm² (mean difference: -1.55 ± 1.89 mm²; limits of agreement: -5.22 to 2.12). The predicted centreline curvature across the stented segment (including ~2 mm proximal and distal margins) is 0.15 ± 0.04 mm⁻¹, while the post-PCI centreline curvature is 0.17 ± 0.03 mm⁻¹ (mean difference: -0.02 ± 0.06 mm⁻¹; limits of agreement: -0.12 to 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed VCI technique achieves non-invasive pre-procedural anatomical and physiological assessment of coronary intervention. The proposed model has the potential to optimize PCI pre-procedural planning and improve the safety and efficiency of PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"370"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01055-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the ability to predict post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and stented vessel informs procedural planning. However, highly precise and effective methods to quantitatively simulate coronary intervention are lacking. This study developed and validated a virtual coronary intervention (VCI) technique for non-invasive physiological and anatomical assessment of PCI.

Methods: In this study, patients with substantial lesions (pre-PCI CT-FFR of less than 0.80) were enrolled. VCI framework was used to predict vessel reshape and post-PCI CT-FFR. The accuracy of predicted post-VCI CT-FFR, luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) and centreline curvature was validated with post-PCI computed tomography (CT) angiography datasets.

Results: Overall, 30 patients are initially screened; 21 meet the inclusion criteria, and 9 patients (9 vessels) are included in the final analysis. The average PCI-simulation time is 24.92 ± 1.00 s on a single processor. The calculated post-PCI CT-FFR is 0.92 ± 0.09, whereas the predicted post-VCI CT-FFR is 0.90 ± 0.08 (mean difference: -0.02 ± 0.05 FFR units; limits of agreement: -0.08 to 0.05). Morphologically, the predicted CSA is 16.36 ± 4.41 mm² and the post-CSA is 17.91 ± 4.84 mm² (mean difference: -1.55 ± 1.89 mm²; limits of agreement: -5.22 to 2.12). The predicted centreline curvature across the stented segment (including ~2 mm proximal and distal margins) is 0.15 ± 0.04 mm⁻¹, while the post-PCI centreline curvature is 0.17 ± 0.03 mm⁻¹ (mean difference: -0.02 ± 0.06 mm⁻¹; limits of agreement: -0.12 to 0.09).

Conclusions: The proposed VCI technique achieves non-invasive pre-procedural anatomical and physiological assessment of coronary intervention. The proposed model has the potential to optimize PCI pre-procedural planning and improve the safety and efficiency of PCI.

预测计算框架,为个性化心血管医学提供数字双胞胎。
背景:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,预测PCI后血流储备分数(FFR)和支架血管的能力为手术计划提供信息。然而,目前还缺乏精确有效的定量模拟冠状动脉介入治疗的方法。本研究开发并验证了一种虚拟冠状动脉介入治疗(VCI)技术,用于PCI的无创生理和解剖评估。方法:本研究纳入有实质性病变(pci前CT-FFR小于0.80)的患者。VCI框架用于预测血管重塑和pci后CT-FFR。预测vci后CT- ffr、管腔横截面积(CSA)和中线曲率的准确性通过pci后计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影数据集进行验证。结果:总体而言,初步筛选了30例患者;符合纳入标准21例,最终纳入9例患者(9条血管)。在单个处理器上,平均pci仿真时间为24.92±1.00 s。计算的pci后CT-FFR为0.92±0.09,而预测的vci后CT-FFR为0.90±0.08(平均差值:-0.02±0.05 FFR单位,一致性限:-0.08至0.05)。形态学上,预测CSA为16.36±4.41 mm²,后CSA为17.91±4.84 mm²(平均差:-1.55±1.89 mm²,一致性限:-5.22 ~ 2.12)。通过支架段(包括~ 2mm的近端和远端边缘)预测的中线弧度为0.15±0.04 mm毒血症¹,而pci后的中线弧度为0.17±0.03 mm毒血症¹(平均差值:-0.02±0.06 mm毒血症¹;一致性限制:-0.12至0.09)。结论:提出的VCI技术实现了冠状动脉介入治疗的无创术前解剖和生理评估。该模型具有优化PCI术前规划、提高PCI安全性和效率的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信