Addressing the need for predictive tools in postoperative abdominal wall complications after nephrectomy - Evaluation of a novel abdominal bulge grading system using computed tomography.
IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Aapo Inkiläinen, Börje Ljungberg, Lennart Blomqvist, Karin Strigård
{"title":"Addressing the need for predictive tools in postoperative abdominal wall complications after nephrectomy - Evaluation of a novel abdominal bulge grading system using computed tomography.","authors":"Aapo Inkiläinen, Börje Ljungberg, Lennart Blomqvist, Karin Strigård","doi":"10.1177/20584601251367336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal bulging affects up to one-fourth of patients after flank incision, with half experiencing impaired quality of life. Identifying patients at risk for morbid bulge could improve preventive and supportive care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterise muscular changes related to postoperative abdominal bulging and design a visual scoring system to grade bulge on postoperative CT scans.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients treated with open partial nephrectomy via a flank incision between 2005 and 2016 at the University Hospital of Umeå were included. Pre- and postoperative CT scans of the first 50 consecutive patients were used to characterise imaging features of the postoperative abdominal wall. From these features, a four-tiered scoring system for abdominal bulge was designed. Two independent observers tested the system on CT scans from the 50 next patients. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Common features of abdominal bulging were extracted and a four-tier visual score ranging from normal abdominal wall to severe bulge was developed. Among the patients, ∼70% had a normal abdominal wall, ∼25% had bulge score 1, ∼7% score 2, and ∼1% score 3. Inter-rater agreement was 73.5%, with Fleiss' Kappa 0.44.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Features of bulge were reduced muscle thickness and ipsilateral gravitational slump affecting part or all of the lateral abdominal wall. The proposed scoring system demonstrated only moderate inter-rater reliability in this pilot setting. Further research on postoperative abdominal wall changes is needed before implementing imaging-based assessments in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":"14 8","pages":"20584601251367336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601251367336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Abdominal bulging affects up to one-fourth of patients after flank incision, with half experiencing impaired quality of life. Identifying patients at risk for morbid bulge could improve preventive and supportive care.
Purpose: To characterise muscular changes related to postoperative abdominal bulging and design a visual scoring system to grade bulge on postoperative CT scans.
Material and methods: Patients treated with open partial nephrectomy via a flank incision between 2005 and 2016 at the University Hospital of Umeå were included. Pre- and postoperative CT scans of the first 50 consecutive patients were used to characterise imaging features of the postoperative abdominal wall. From these features, a four-tiered scoring system for abdominal bulge was designed. Two independent observers tested the system on CT scans from the 50 next patients. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa.
Results: Common features of abdominal bulging were extracted and a four-tier visual score ranging from normal abdominal wall to severe bulge was developed. Among the patients, ∼70% had a normal abdominal wall, ∼25% had bulge score 1, ∼7% score 2, and ∼1% score 3. Inter-rater agreement was 73.5%, with Fleiss' Kappa 0.44.
Conclusion: Features of bulge were reduced muscle thickness and ipsilateral gravitational slump affecting part or all of the lateral abdominal wall. The proposed scoring system demonstrated only moderate inter-rater reliability in this pilot setting. Further research on postoperative abdominal wall changes is needed before implementing imaging-based assessments in clinical care.