A scoping review of literature about 3D printing: knowledge, skills and attitude for simulation educators in healthcare.

IF 3.1 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Luther Raechal, Maria Bajwa, Jabeen Fayyaz, Giovanni Biglino, Suzan Kardong-Edgren
{"title":"A scoping review of literature about 3D printing: knowledge, skills and attitude for simulation educators in healthcare.","authors":"Luther Raechal, Maria Bajwa, Jabeen Fayyaz, Giovanni Biglino, Suzan Kardong-Edgren","doi":"10.1186/s41205-025-00292-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-Dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing (Linke, Additive manufacturing, explained, 2017), has rapidly emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare simulation. This scoping review investigates simulation educators' knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) about the impact of 3D printing and explores 3D printing's broader applications in healthcare simulation. By synthesizing existing literature, this study aims to identify trends, challenges, and opportunities for integrating 3D printing into simulation-based education.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>The review followed the PRISMA-ScR framework, employing a six-step approach. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Medline, ERIC, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, covering studies published between 2000 and 2023. Keywords related to 3D printing and simulation-based education were used. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles discussing 3D printing's role in KSAs for simulation educators and its applications in healthcare simulation. Articles were charted and analyzed thematically to identify trends, challenges, and outcomes. A total of 181 studies were included, spanning 36 countries and 113 journals. Most studies focused on medical education, with 73% utilizing 3D-printed models for direct teaching. Key themes identified included realism, skill development, cost-effectiveness, and teaching effectiveness. Challenges included model accuracy, training gaps for educators, and resource limitations. Study designs were predominantly descriptive, with a significant portion being single-site case reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D printing has the potential to revolutionize simulation-based education by enhancing realism, accessibility, and skill development. However, gaps in educator training and methodological rigor must be addressed. Future research should focus on multi-institutional studies and long-term outcomes to maximize the impact of the technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00292-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Three-Dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing (Linke, Additive manufacturing, explained, 2017), has rapidly emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare simulation. This scoping review investigates simulation educators' knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) about the impact of 3D printing and explores 3D printing's broader applications in healthcare simulation. By synthesizing existing literature, this study aims to identify trends, challenges, and opportunities for integrating 3D printing into simulation-based education.

Main body: The review followed the PRISMA-ScR framework, employing a six-step approach. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Medline, ERIC, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, covering studies published between 2000 and 2023. Keywords related to 3D printing and simulation-based education were used. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles discussing 3D printing's role in KSAs for simulation educators and its applications in healthcare simulation. Articles were charted and analyzed thematically to identify trends, challenges, and outcomes. A total of 181 studies were included, spanning 36 countries and 113 journals. Most studies focused on medical education, with 73% utilizing 3D-printed models for direct teaching. Key themes identified included realism, skill development, cost-effectiveness, and teaching effectiveness. Challenges included model accuracy, training gaps for educators, and resource limitations. Study designs were predominantly descriptive, with a significant portion being single-site case reports.

Conclusion: 3D printing has the potential to revolutionize simulation-based education by enhancing realism, accessibility, and skill development. However, gaps in educator training and methodological rigor must be addressed. Future research should focus on multi-institutional studies and long-term outcomes to maximize the impact of the technology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关于3D打印的文献范围审查:知识,技能和态度模拟教育在医疗保健。
背景:三维(3D)打印,也称为增材制造(Linke, additive manufacturing, explained, 2017),已迅速成为医疗保健模拟的变革性工具。这个范围审查调查模拟教育工作者的知识,技能和态度(KSAs)关于3D打印的影响,并探讨3D打印在医疗保健模拟的更广泛的应用。通过综合现有文献,本研究旨在确定将3D打印整合到基于模拟的教育中的趋势、挑战和机遇。正文:审查遵循PRISMA-ScR框架,采用六步方法。在PubMed、Medline、ERIC、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar等数据库中进行了全面的搜索,涵盖了2000年至2023年间发表的研究。使用3D打印和模拟教育相关的关键词。纳入标准侧重于同行评议的文章,讨论3D打印在模拟教育工作者的ksa中的作用及其在医疗保健模拟中的应用。文章被绘制成图表并按主题进行分析,以确定趋势、挑战和结果。共纳入了181项研究,涉及36个国家和113种期刊。大多数研究集中在医学教育上,73%的研究利用3d打印模型进行直接教学。确定的关键主题包括现实主义、技能发展、成本效益和教学效果。挑战包括模型的准确性、教育工作者的培训差距和资源限制。研究设计主要是描述性的,其中很大一部分是单点病例报告。结论:3D打印有可能通过增强真实感、可访问性和技能发展来彻底改变基于模拟的教育。但是,必须解决教育工作者培训和方法严谨性方面的差距。未来的研究应侧重于多机构研究和长期结果,以最大限度地发挥该技术的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信