Discontinuation of treatment for alcohol use disorder during pregnancy and postpartum in the United States

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Caitlin E. Martin, Jennifer K. Bello, Bridget M. Galati, Joanna L. Buss, Mishka Terplan, Hendrée E. Jones, Kathleen T. Mitchell, Silvia S. Martins, Richard A. Grucza, Elizabeth A. Suarez, Kevin Y. Xu
{"title":"Discontinuation of treatment for alcohol use disorder during pregnancy and postpartum in the United States","authors":"Caitlin E. Martin,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Bello,&nbsp;Bridget M. Galati,&nbsp;Joanna L. Buss,&nbsp;Mishka Terplan,&nbsp;Hendrée E. Jones,&nbsp;Kathleen T. Mitchell,&nbsp;Silvia S. Martins,&nbsp;Richard A. Grucza,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Suarez,&nbsp;Kevin Y. Xu","doi":"10.1111/acer.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The degree of alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment utilization during the perinatal period is unknown. We report the prevalence of preconception receipt of medications for AUD (MAUD) and psychosocial interventions (PSY), discontinuation during pregnancy, and postpartum resumption in a multi-state sample, comparing pregnant and nonpregnant people with AUD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using MarketScan combined commercial and Medicaid claims (2016–2019), we identified individuals with AUD who had continuous insurance coverage throughout pregnancy, classifying those with a live birth as pregnant, and compared their MAUD and PSY patterns to nonpregnant peers matched by age, insurance type, and calendar time. All individuals had ≥1 claim for: (a) AUD diagnosis and (b) MAUD or PSY in the year preceding the study. Outcomes—filled MAUD prescriptions (naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram) and receipt of PSY—were identified via claims. We computed rates of MAUD and PSY receipt, stratifying by five observation windows for pregnant individuals (12-week preconception; first, second, and third trimesters; 12 weeks postpartum) and nonpregnant peers (by corresponding windows). We assessed time to treatment discontinuation using multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for sociodemographics and comorbidities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our sample consisted of 2080 pregnant persons with AUD and 7564 matched nonpregnant AUD peers. During pregnancy, MAUD receipt declined from 12.1% (preconception) to 0.3% (third trimester) among pregnant people and from 13.5% to 8.1% in nonpregnant peers during the equivalent time period (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Postpartum resumption of MAUD was uncommon in the pregnant cohort (pregnant = 1.9%; nonpregnant = 7.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). PSY declined for both the pregnant and nonpregnant cohorts yet remained modestly higher in the nonpregnant cohort (postpartum 10.3% vs. 13.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In adjusted analyses, pregnant people were more likely to discontinue MAUD than nonpregnant peers (HR = 2.11 [1.71–2.60]) yet not more likely to discontinue PSY (HR = 1.01 [0.87–1.17]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among pregnant people with preconception AUD receiving treatment, MAUD utilization is low and discontinuation is widespread, persisting postpartum.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 9","pages":"1972-1982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The degree of alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment utilization during the perinatal period is unknown. We report the prevalence of preconception receipt of medications for AUD (MAUD) and psychosocial interventions (PSY), discontinuation during pregnancy, and postpartum resumption in a multi-state sample, comparing pregnant and nonpregnant people with AUD.

Methods

Using MarketScan combined commercial and Medicaid claims (2016–2019), we identified individuals with AUD who had continuous insurance coverage throughout pregnancy, classifying those with a live birth as pregnant, and compared their MAUD and PSY patterns to nonpregnant peers matched by age, insurance type, and calendar time. All individuals had ≥1 claim for: (a) AUD diagnosis and (b) MAUD or PSY in the year preceding the study. Outcomes—filled MAUD prescriptions (naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram) and receipt of PSY—were identified via claims. We computed rates of MAUD and PSY receipt, stratifying by five observation windows for pregnant individuals (12-week preconception; first, second, and third trimesters; 12 weeks postpartum) and nonpregnant peers (by corresponding windows). We assessed time to treatment discontinuation using multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for sociodemographics and comorbidities.

Results

Our sample consisted of 2080 pregnant persons with AUD and 7564 matched nonpregnant AUD peers. During pregnancy, MAUD receipt declined from 12.1% (preconception) to 0.3% (third trimester) among pregnant people and from 13.5% to 8.1% in nonpregnant peers during the equivalent time period (p < 0.001). Postpartum resumption of MAUD was uncommon in the pregnant cohort (pregnant = 1.9%; nonpregnant = 7.8%, p < 0.001). PSY declined for both the pregnant and nonpregnant cohorts yet remained modestly higher in the nonpregnant cohort (postpartum 10.3% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, pregnant people were more likely to discontinue MAUD than nonpregnant peers (HR = 2.11 [1.71–2.60]) yet not more likely to discontinue PSY (HR = 1.01 [0.87–1.17]).

Conclusions

Among pregnant people with preconception AUD receiving treatment, MAUD utilization is low and discontinuation is widespread, persisting postpartum.

Abstract Image

美国孕期和产后酒精使用障碍的中止治疗
背景:围产期酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗利用程度尚不清楚。我们报告了孕前接受AUD药物治疗(MAUD)和心理社会干预(PSY),妊娠期间停药和产后恢复的患病率,在多状态样本中,比较了怀孕和非怀孕的AUD患者。方法:使用MarketScan结合商业和医疗补助索赔(2016-2019),我们确定了在整个怀孕期间连续投保的AUD患者,将活产的患者分类为怀孕,并将其MAUD和PSY模式与未怀孕的同龄人进行比较,并按年龄、保险类型和日历时间进行匹配。所有个体在研究前一年有≥1次AUD诊断和(b) MAUD或PSY索赔。结果-填满MAUD处方(纳曲酮,阿坎普罗酸和双硫仑)和收到psyp -通过索赔确定。我们计算了MAUD和PSY的接收率,通过五个观察窗口对孕妇(孕前12周;第一、第二和第三个三个月;产后12周)和未怀孕的同龄人(通过相应的窗口)进行分层。我们使用多变量Cox回归评估到停止治疗的时间,调整社会人口统计学和合并症。结果:我们的样本包括2080名AUD孕妇和7564名匹配的非孕妇AUD同行。在怀孕期间,孕妇的MAUD使用率从12.1%(孕前)下降到0.3%(妊娠晚期),在相同的时间段内,未怀孕的同龄人从13.5%下降到8.1% (p结论:在接受治疗的孕前AUD孕妇中,MAUD使用率低,停药普遍存在,并持续到产后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信