Remimazolam vs propofol for postoperative delirium in adults undergoing general anesthesia: A meta-analysis.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Huijin Zhou, Jing Zhang, Chunyan Du
{"title":"Remimazolam vs propofol for postoperative delirium in adults undergoing general anesthesia: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Huijin Zhou, Jing Zhang, Chunyan Du","doi":"10.17305/bb.2025.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a prevalent and serious complication in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. Remimazolam, an innovative ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has been identified as a potential alternative to propofol due to its advantageous pharmacological properties. However, its impact on POD remains uncertain. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was performed up to March 29, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remimazolam and propofol in adult surgical patients under general anesthesia, specifically reporting on POD incidence, were included. A random-effects model was utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), accounting for heterogeneity. The analysis included seventeen RCTs encompassing 3,133 patients. Overall, remimazolam significantly decreased the risk of POD compared to propofol (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.97, p = 0.03; I² = 36%). Sensitivity analyses, which involved excluding one study at a time, yielded consistent results, reinforcing the robustness of the findings. Subgroup analyses revealed uniform effects across different study designs (single-blind vs. double-blind; OR: 0.73 vs. 0.64; p = 0.71) and age groups (adults vs. elderly; OR: 0.64 vs. 0.72; p = 0.79). A trend toward greater benefit was observed in studies with longer follow-up periods (7 days: OR: 0.42) and in those employing the CAM or CAM-ICU for POD diagnosis, although subgroup differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, remimazolam is associated with a significantly reduced risk of POD compared to propofol in adults undergoing general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2025.12826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a prevalent and serious complication in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. Remimazolam, an innovative ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has been identified as a potential alternative to propofol due to its advantageous pharmacological properties. However, its impact on POD remains uncertain. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was performed up to March 29, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remimazolam and propofol in adult surgical patients under general anesthesia, specifically reporting on POD incidence, were included. A random-effects model was utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), accounting for heterogeneity. The analysis included seventeen RCTs encompassing 3,133 patients. Overall, remimazolam significantly decreased the risk of POD compared to propofol (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.97, p = 0.03; I² = 36%). Sensitivity analyses, which involved excluding one study at a time, yielded consistent results, reinforcing the robustness of the findings. Subgroup analyses revealed uniform effects across different study designs (single-blind vs. double-blind; OR: 0.73 vs. 0.64; p = 0.71) and age groups (adults vs. elderly; OR: 0.64 vs. 0.72; p = 0.79). A trend toward greater benefit was observed in studies with longer follow-up periods (7 days: OR: 0.42) and in those employing the CAM or CAM-ICU for POD diagnosis, although subgroup differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, remimazolam is associated with a significantly reduced risk of POD compared to propofol in adults undergoing general anesthesia.

雷马唑仑与异丙酚治疗全麻成人术后谵妄:一项荟萃分析。
术后谵妄(POD)是成人全麻手术中常见且严重的并发症。雷马唑仑是一种创新的超短效苯二氮卓类药物,由于其有利的药理特性,已被确定为异丙酚的潜在替代品。然而,它对POD的影响仍不确定。本研究遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI和万方数据库,检索截止日期为2025年3月29日。随机对照试验(rct)比较雷马唑仑和异丙酚在全身麻醉下的成人手术患者中,特别报告了POD的发生率。采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并优势比(ORs),说明异质性。该分析包括17项随机对照试验,涵盖3133名患者。总体而言,与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑显著降低POD的风险(OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.97, p = 0.03; I²= 36%)。敏感性分析每次排除一项研究,得出了一致的结果,加强了研究结果的稳健性。亚组分析显示不同研究设计(单盲vs双盲;OR: 0.73 vs 0.64; p = 0.71)和年龄组(成人vs老年人;OR: 0.64 vs 0.72; p = 0.79)的效果是一致的。在随访时间较长的研究(7天:OR: 0.42)和采用CAM或CAM- icu诊断POD的研究中,观察到更大的获益趋势,尽管亚组差异无统计学意义。综上所述,在接受全身麻醉的成人中,与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑可显著降低POD的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信