Application of Modified Early Warning Score System (MEWS) in the Assessment of Disease Condition and Prognosis of Patients After Neurosurgical Procedure or Intervention.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S532103
Ping Liu, Jiao Xu, Yuhua Liu, Xuexuan Wang, Qili Tan, Ying Wang
{"title":"Application of Modified Early Warning Score System (MEWS) in the Assessment of Disease Condition and Prognosis of Patients After Neurosurgical Procedure or Intervention.","authors":"Ping Liu, Jiao Xu, Yuhua Liu, Xuexuan Wang, Qili Tan, Ying Wang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S532103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and clinical utility of the corrected Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) system in predicting postoperative clinical deterioration and long-term prognosis in neurosurgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted on 344 neurosurgical patients admitted between December 2021 and April 2022. Physiological parameters including axillary temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and consciousness level were systematically recorded. Patients were monitored for clinical deterioration and final outcomes over a 90-day postoperative period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed with 90-day mortality as the primary endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated a significant correlation between elevated corrected MEWS scores and clinical severity (p<0.001). ROC analysis revealed excellent predictive accuracy for 90-day mortality (AUC=0.944), with an optimal cutoff value of 4.5 points demonstrating high sensitivity (92.9%) and specificity (82.0%). The maximum Youden's index of 0.749 further confirmed the robust discriminative capacity of this threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The corrected MEWS scoring system shows strong predictive validity for postoperative clinical deterioration and long-term outcomes in neurosurgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2693-2699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S532103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and clinical utility of the corrected Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) system in predicting postoperative clinical deterioration and long-term prognosis in neurosurgical patients.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 344 neurosurgical patients admitted between December 2021 and April 2022. Physiological parameters including axillary temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and consciousness level were systematically recorded. Patients were monitored for clinical deterioration and final outcomes over a 90-day postoperative period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed with 90-day mortality as the primary endpoint.

Results: The study demonstrated a significant correlation between elevated corrected MEWS scores and clinical severity (p<0.001). ROC analysis revealed excellent predictive accuracy for 90-day mortality (AUC=0.944), with an optimal cutoff value of 4.5 points demonstrating high sensitivity (92.9%) and specificity (82.0%). The maximum Youden's index of 0.749 further confirmed the robust discriminative capacity of this threshold.

Conclusion: The corrected MEWS scoring system shows strong predictive validity for postoperative clinical deterioration and long-term outcomes in neurosurgical patients.

Abstract Image

改良早期预警评分系统(MEWS)在神经外科手术或干预后患者病情及预后评估中的应用
目的:评价修正后的修正早期预警评分(MEWS)系统在预测神经外科患者术后临床恶化和远期预后方面的安全性和临床应用价值。方法:对2021年12月至2022年4月期间入院的344例神经外科患者进行前瞻性队列研究。系统记录腋窝温度、呼吸频率、心率、收缩压、动脉血氧饱和度、意识水平等生理参数。在术后90天内监测患者的临床恶化和最终结果。以90天死亡率为主要终点进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。结果:本研究表明,MEWS矫正评分与临床严重程度之间存在显著相关性(p)。结论:MEWS矫正评分系统对神经外科患者术后临床恶化和远期预后具有较强的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信