Factors Affecting Access to Neurosurgical Care in Diverse Communities in Canada: A Qualitative Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joshua A Bougadis, Piper C Rome, Tharushi N Perera, Julius O Ebinu
{"title":"Factors Affecting Access to Neurosurgical Care in Diverse Communities in Canada: A Qualitative Scoping Review.","authors":"Joshua A Bougadis, Piper C Rome, Tharushi N Perera, Julius O Ebinu","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.10411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to neurosurgical care is essential for addressing elective and non-elective neurosurgical conditions. Disparities in healthcare access in Canada persist, disproportionately affecting rural, Indigenous and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. This scoping review sought to identify barriers and facilitators influencing neurosurgical access to care while highlighting gaps in the literature on equity-deserving groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of articles published from January 2000 to August 2024 was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus. Gray literature from governmental and non-governmental organizations was also reviewed. Of 1400 identified records, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were analyzed using inductive coding and thematic analysis to explore socioeconomic, geographic, racial, gender-based and cultural barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: delays in access, alternative healthcare options, policy barriers and communication and coordination. Barriers including transportation gaps, socioeconomic inequities and systemic discrimination were prominent, especially for rural and Indigenous populations. Facilitators like telehealth and improved inter-hospital coordination showed promise but were hindered by infrastructure limitations and cultural misalignments. Few studies addressed the intersectionality of these barriers, highlighting gaps in understanding their cumulative impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings in this review underscore the need for systemic reforms, including equitable resource allocation, digital infrastructure expansion and culturally congruent care. Addressing these barriers is critical to ensuring timely and equitable neurosurgical care across Canada. Future research should prioritize intersectional approaches to better understand overlapping access challenges and evaluate the efficacy of tailored interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to neurosurgical care is essential for addressing elective and non-elective neurosurgical conditions. Disparities in healthcare access in Canada persist, disproportionately affecting rural, Indigenous and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. This scoping review sought to identify barriers and facilitators influencing neurosurgical access to care while highlighting gaps in the literature on equity-deserving groups.

Methods: A systematic literature search of articles published from January 2000 to August 2024 was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus. Gray literature from governmental and non-governmental organizations was also reviewed. Of 1400 identified records, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were analyzed using inductive coding and thematic analysis to explore socioeconomic, geographic, racial, gender-based and cultural barriers.

Results: Four major themes emerged: delays in access, alternative healthcare options, policy barriers and communication and coordination. Barriers including transportation gaps, socioeconomic inequities and systemic discrimination were prominent, especially for rural and Indigenous populations. Facilitators like telehealth and improved inter-hospital coordination showed promise but were hindered by infrastructure limitations and cultural misalignments. Few studies addressed the intersectionality of these barriers, highlighting gaps in understanding their cumulative impact.

Conclusion: The findings in this review underscore the need for systemic reforms, including equitable resource allocation, digital infrastructure expansion and culturally congruent care. Addressing these barriers is critical to ensuring timely and equitable neurosurgical care across Canada. Future research should prioritize intersectional approaches to better understand overlapping access challenges and evaluate the efficacy of tailored interventions.

影响加拿大不同社区获得神经外科护理的因素:一项定性范围审查。
简介:获得神经外科护理是必要的解决选择性和非选择性神经外科条件。加拿大在获得保健服务方面的差距仍然存在,对农村、土著和社会经济上处于不利地位的人口的影响尤为严重。本综述旨在确定影响神经外科获得护理的障碍和促进因素,同时强调文献中关于公平应得群体的差距。方法:采用MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、PsycINFO、Scopus对2000年1月~ 2024年8月发表的文献进行系统检索。还审查了来自政府和非政府组织的灰色文献。在1400份确定的记录中,有8项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究采用归纳编码和专题分析的方法进行分析,探讨社会经济、地理、种族、性别和文化障碍。结果:出现了四个主要主题:获取延迟、替代医疗选择、政策障碍以及沟通和协调。交通差距、社会经济不平等和系统性歧视等障碍十分突出,特别是对农村和土著人口而言。远程保健和改善医院间协调等促进因素显示出希望,但受到基础设施限制和文化错位的阻碍。很少有研究涉及这些障碍的交叉性,突出了在理解其累积影响方面的差距。结论:本综述的研究结果强调了系统性改革的必要性,包括公平的资源分配、数字基础设施的扩展和文化一致性护理。解决这些障碍对于确保加拿大及时和公平的神经外科护理至关重要。未来的研究应优先考虑交叉方法,以更好地了解重叠的获取挑战,并评估量身定制的干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信