Tiered Training and Licensure for the Future of the Pharmacy Profession: Panacea or Pandora's Box?

Abstract

Objective

To summarize the findings of an Academic Leadership Fellows Program debate and to evaluate the affirmative and opposing arguments for implementing a tiered training and licensure model within the pharmacy profession.

Findings

This analysis was conducted as part of the Academic Leadership Fellows Program, where fellows debated current topics in academic pharmacy. Debate participants reviewed contemporary and historical literature on the transition to the all-Doctor of Pharmacy degree, conducted informal polls and surveys of colleagues and key opinion leaders in pharmacy education and practice, and synthesized their findings to assess the potential impact of a tiered training model. The analysis revealed diverse perspectives on the role of tiered pharmacy education and licensure. Proponents and opponents aligned their arguments around three core themes: oversight of the medication use process, economic impacts, and professional identity considerations for all pharmacy professionals.

Summary

In light of current challenges, including weakening employment conditions, professional dissatisfaction, and declining student applicant pools, a comprehensive examination of alternative training models is timely. Although a tiered training and licensure model offers potential solutions, it also presents significant risks. Enhanced integration of pharmacy technician training and credentialing alongside pharmacist education is critical and should be embraced, particularly for advanced technician roles.