Long-Term Anticoagulation Discontinuation After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: The ALONE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 55 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Daehoon Kim, Jaemin Shim, Eue-Keun Choi, Il-Young Oh, Jun Kim, Young Soo Lee, Junbeom Park, Jum-Suk Ko, Kyoung-Min Park, Jung-Hoon Sung, Hyung Wook Park, Hyung-Seob Park, Jong-Youn Kim, Ki-Woon Kang, Dongmin Kim, Jin-Kyu Park, Dae-Hyeok Kim, Jin-Bae Kim, Hee Tae Yu, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jae-Sun Uhm, Hui-Nam Pak, Boyoung Joung
{"title":"Long-Term Anticoagulation Discontinuation After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: The ALONE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Daehoon Kim, Jaemin Shim, Eue-Keun Choi, Il-Young Oh, Jun Kim, Young Soo Lee, Junbeom Park, Jum-Suk Ko, Kyoung-Min Park, Jung-Hoon Sung, Hyung Wook Park, Hyung-Seob Park, Jong-Youn Kim, Ki-Woon Kang, Dongmin Kim, Jin-Kyu Park, Dae-Hyeok Kim, Jin-Bae Kim, Hee Tae Yu, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jae-Sun Uhm, Hui-Nam Pak, Boyoung Joung","doi":"10.1001/jama.2025.14679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Data from randomized clinical trials on a long-term anticoagulation strategy for patients after catheter-based ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy provides superior clinical outcomes compared with continuing oral anticoagulant therapy in patients without documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for AF.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A randomized clinical trial including 840 adult patients (aged 19-80 years) who were enrolled and randomized from July 28, 2020, to March 9, 2023, at 18 hospitals in South Korea. Enrolled patients had at least 1 non-sex-related stroke risk factor (determined using the CHA2DS2-VASc score [range, 0-9]) and no documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia for at least 1 year after catheter ablation for AF. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is used as an assessment of stroke risk among patients with AF (calculated using point values for congestive heart failure, hypertension, ≥75 years of age, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, between 65 and 74 years of age, and sex category). The date of final follow-up was June 4, 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy (n = 417) or continue oral anticoagulant therapy (with direct oral anticoagulants; n = 423).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding at 2 years. Individual components of the primary outcome (such as ischemic stroke and major bleeding) were assessed as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 840 adults randomized, the mean age was 64 (SD, 8) years, 24.9% were women, the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.1 (SD, 1.0), and 67.6% had paroxysmal AF. At 2 years, the primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.3%) in the discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy group vs 8 patients (2.2%) in the continue oral anticoagulant therapy group (absolute difference, -1.9 percentage points [95% CI, -3.5 to -0.3]; P = .02). The 2-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 0.3% in the discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy group vs 0.8% in the continue oral anticoagulant therapy group (absolute difference, -0.5 percentage points [95% CI, -1.6 to 0.6]). Major bleeding occurred in 0 patients in the discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy group vs 5 patients (1.4%) in the continue oral anticoagulant therapy group (absolute difference, -1.4 percentage points [95% CI, -2.6 to -0.2]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Among patients without documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for AF, discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy resulted in a lower risk for the composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding vs continuing direct oral anticoagulant therapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04432220.</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":55.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.14679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Data from randomized clinical trials on a long-term anticoagulation strategy for patients after catheter-based ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking.

Objective: To evaluate whether discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy provides superior clinical outcomes compared with continuing oral anticoagulant therapy in patients without documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for AF.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized clinical trial including 840 adult patients (aged 19-80 years) who were enrolled and randomized from July 28, 2020, to March 9, 2023, at 18 hospitals in South Korea. Enrolled patients had at least 1 non-sex-related stroke risk factor (determined using the CHA2DS2-VASc score [range, 0-9]) and no documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia for at least 1 year after catheter ablation for AF. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is used as an assessment of stroke risk among patients with AF (calculated using point values for congestive heart failure, hypertension, ≥75 years of age, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, between 65 and 74 years of age, and sex category). The date of final follow-up was June 4, 2025.

Interventions: The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy (n = 417) or continue oral anticoagulant therapy (with direct oral anticoagulants; n = 423).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding at 2 years. Individual components of the primary outcome (such as ischemic stroke and major bleeding) were assessed as secondary outcomes.

Results: Of the 840 adults randomized, the mean age was 64 (SD, 8) years, 24.9% were women, the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.1 (SD, 1.0), and 67.6% had paroxysmal AF. At 2 years, the primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.3%) in the discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy group vs 8 patients (2.2%) in the continue oral anticoagulant therapy group (absolute difference, -1.9 percentage points [95% CI, -3.5 to -0.3]; P = .02). The 2-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 0.3% in the discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy group vs 0.8% in the continue oral anticoagulant therapy group (absolute difference, -0.5 percentage points [95% CI, -1.6 to 0.6]). Major bleeding occurred in 0 patients in the discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy group vs 5 patients (1.4%) in the continue oral anticoagulant therapy group (absolute difference, -1.4 percentage points [95% CI, -2.6 to -0.2]).

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients without documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for AF, discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy resulted in a lower risk for the composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding vs continuing direct oral anticoagulant therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04432220.

房颤导管消融后长期抗凝停药:单独-房颤随机临床试验。
重要性:缺乏心房颤动(AF)导管消融后患者长期抗凝策略的随机临床试验数据。目的:评估在房颤导管消融后无房颤复发的患者中,与继续口服抗凝治疗相比,停止口服抗凝治疗是否能提供更好的临床结果。设计、环境和参与者:一项随机临床试验,包括840名成年患者(19-80岁),于2020年7月28日至2023年3月9日在韩国18家医院进行随机分组。纳入的患者至少有1个与性别无关的卒中危险因素(使用CHA2DS2-VASc评分[范围,0-9]确定),房颤导管消融后至少1年内无房性心律失常复发记录。CHA2DS2-VASc评分用于评估房颤患者的卒中风险(使用充血性心力衰竭、高血压、≥75岁、糖尿病、卒中或一过性脑缺血发作、血管疾病、年龄在65 - 74岁之间,按性别分类)。最后一次随访日期为2025年6月4日。干预措施:患者按1:1的比例随机分配到停止口服抗凝治疗(n = 417)或继续口服抗凝治疗(n = 423)。主要结局和指标:主要结局是2年内首次出现卒中、全身性栓塞和大出血的复合情况。主要结局的个别组成部分(如缺血性卒中和大出血)被评估为次要结局。结果:在840名随机分组的成年人中,平均年龄为64岁(SD, 8)岁,女性占24.9%,CHA2DS2-VASc平均评分为2.1 (SD, 1.0), 67.6%患有阵发性房颤。2年后,主要结局发生在停止口服抗凝治疗组的1例患者(0.3%)vs继续口服抗凝治疗组的8例患者(2.2%)(绝对差异为-1.9个百分点[95% CI, -3.5至-0.3];P = .02)。停止口服抗凝治疗组的2年累计缺血性卒中发生率为0.3%,而继续口服抗凝治疗组为0.8%(绝对差异为-0.5个百分点[95% CI, -1.6至0.6])。停止口服抗凝治疗组有0例患者发生大出血,而继续口服抗凝治疗组有5例患者(1.4%)发生大出血(绝对差值为-1.4个百分点[95% CI, -2.6 ~ -0.2])。结论及相关性:在房颤导管消融后无房性心律失常复发记录的患者中,与继续直接口服抗凝治疗相比,停止口服抗凝治疗导致卒中、全身栓塞和大出血的综合结局风险较低。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04432220。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信