{"title":"Second-order facial features are processed analytically in composite faces.","authors":"Xue Jun Cheng, Daniel R Little","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03144-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to claims of holistic processing, upright aligned composite face morphs were recently shown to be processed in the same manner as inverted or misaligned composite face morphs (Cheng et al. 2018. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 44, 833-862). In the present paper, we replicate that work, using a set of schematic faces which vary second-order features (e.g., lip height and eye separation) in the top and bottom halves of the schematic face. We find that the present stimuli show the hallmarks of holistic processing in a complete composite face task, but differ from composite face morphs in that the best fitting MDS metric is more commensurate with an assumption of integrality (i.e., Euclidean distance). Nevertheless, we also find that, as with morph faces, the processing of upright aligned and upright misaligned faces is consistent with a mixture of serial and parallel processing. Importantly, we found little evidence of any strong holistic pooling of the top and bottom face halves into a single object. These results remain consistent with the idea that composite faces are not processed differently from other objects with separable dimensions but instead that composite faces allow more parallel processing when aligned than when misaligned. Data and code are available from: http://github.com/knowlabUnimelb/SCHEMATICFACERULES .</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03144-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In contrast to claims of holistic processing, upright aligned composite face morphs were recently shown to be processed in the same manner as inverted or misaligned composite face morphs (Cheng et al. 2018. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 44, 833-862). In the present paper, we replicate that work, using a set of schematic faces which vary second-order features (e.g., lip height and eye separation) in the top and bottom halves of the schematic face. We find that the present stimuli show the hallmarks of holistic processing in a complete composite face task, but differ from composite face morphs in that the best fitting MDS metric is more commensurate with an assumption of integrality (i.e., Euclidean distance). Nevertheless, we also find that, as with morph faces, the processing of upright aligned and upright misaligned faces is consistent with a mixture of serial and parallel processing. Importantly, we found little evidence of any strong holistic pooling of the top and bottom face halves into a single object. These results remain consistent with the idea that composite faces are not processed differently from other objects with separable dimensions but instead that composite faces allow more parallel processing when aligned than when misaligned. Data and code are available from: http://github.com/knowlabUnimelb/SCHEMATICFACERULES .
与整体处理的主张相反,直立对齐的复合面部变形最近被证明以与倒置或不对齐的复合面部变形相同的方式处理(Cheng et al. 2018)。实验心理学杂志:学习,记忆和认知,44,833-862)。在本文中,我们复制了这项工作,使用了一组原理图面孔,这些面孔在原理图面孔的上半部分和下半部分具有不同的二阶特征(例如,嘴唇高度和眼睛间距)。我们发现,当前的刺激在完整的复合人脸任务中显示出整体处理的特征,但与复合人脸形态不同的是,最佳拟合MDS度量更符合完整性假设(即欧几里得距离)。然而,我们也发现,与变形面一样,直立对齐和直立不对齐面的处理与串行和并行处理的混合是一致的。重要的是,我们发现很少有证据表明,上下两半的脸有很强的整体池化成一个单一的对象。这些结果与复合面与其他具有可分离维度的对象的处理方式不同的观点是一致的,相反,复合面在对齐时比在不对齐时允许更多的并行处理。数据和代码可从http://github.com/knowlabUnimelb/SCHEMATICFACERULES获得。
期刊介绍:
The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.