Ecotoxicological assessment of the environmental risks of a glyphosate-based herbicide recently introduced in the Brazilian market: a perspective from plant-based bioassays.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marcel José Palmieri, Joice Lima Ferreira, Franciele de Fátima Domingos, Leonardo Mendes Silva, Maria Eduarda Magalhães, Tamara Alessandra Costa Santos, Akemi Wiermannss Okazaki, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira
{"title":"Ecotoxicological assessment of the environmental risks of a glyphosate-based herbicide recently introduced in the Brazilian market: a perspective from plant-based bioassays.","authors":"Marcel José Palmieri, Joice Lima Ferreira, Franciele de Fátima Domingos, Leonardo Mendes Silva, Maria Eduarda Magalhães, Tamara Alessandra Costa Santos, Akemi Wiermannss Okazaki, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira","doi":"10.1080/15287394.2025.2549557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study determined the phytotoxic and cytogenetic effects of two glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs): XEQUE MATE HT IHARA® (restricted agricultural use - GBHn) and CITROMAX MAX 20 (used for gardening, sold for the general public - GBHg). Phytotoxicity bioassays were conducted using four non-target species (<i>Lactuca sativa</i>, <i>Raphanus sativus</i>, <i>Pennisetum glaucum</i>, and <i>Hordeum vulgare</i>) and one target species (<i>Bidens pilosa</i>). Both GBHs significantly reduced germination rate (G%), germination speed index (GSI), fresh mass (FM), and seedling growth (SG) in a dose-dependent manner. SG was the most sensitive endpoint with decreases over 99% at 480 mg/L for both GBHs. <i>Bidens pilosa</i> exhibited the highest sensitivity index (SI = 0.93 for GBHn, 0.8 for GBHg), confirming target specificity. Overall SI were similar (OSI = 0.75 for GBHn; 0.72 for GBHg), indicating comparable toxicity. Cytogenetic assays using <i>Allium cepa</i> demonstrated significant reductions in mitotic index (MI) at higher concentrations (> 40% decrease at higher doses), with limited chromosomal alterations but notable increases in micronuclei (MN) (up to 6 per 1,000 cells) for both GBHs. GBHn induced more MN formation than GBHg, suggesting greater genotoxicity. Despite similar phytotoxic profiles, GBHn's higher genotoxicity warrants concern. These results indicate the environmental risks posed by treatments with both formulations and emphasize the need for rigorous regulatory scrutiny for glyphosate-based herbicides.</p>","PeriodicalId":54758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part A-Current Issues","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part A-Current Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2025.2549557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study determined the phytotoxic and cytogenetic effects of two glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs): XEQUE MATE HT IHARA® (restricted agricultural use - GBHn) and CITROMAX MAX 20 (used for gardening, sold for the general public - GBHg). Phytotoxicity bioassays were conducted using four non-target species (Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Pennisetum glaucum, and Hordeum vulgare) and one target species (Bidens pilosa). Both GBHs significantly reduced germination rate (G%), germination speed index (GSI), fresh mass (FM), and seedling growth (SG) in a dose-dependent manner. SG was the most sensitive endpoint with decreases over 99% at 480 mg/L for both GBHs. Bidens pilosa exhibited the highest sensitivity index (SI = 0.93 for GBHn, 0.8 for GBHg), confirming target specificity. Overall SI were similar (OSI = 0.75 for GBHn; 0.72 for GBHg), indicating comparable toxicity. Cytogenetic assays using Allium cepa demonstrated significant reductions in mitotic index (MI) at higher concentrations (> 40% decrease at higher doses), with limited chromosomal alterations but notable increases in micronuclei (MN) (up to 6 per 1,000 cells) for both GBHs. GBHn induced more MN formation than GBHg, suggesting greater genotoxicity. Despite similar phytotoxic profiles, GBHn's higher genotoxicity warrants concern. These results indicate the environmental risks posed by treatments with both formulations and emphasize the need for rigorous regulatory scrutiny for glyphosate-based herbicides.

最近在巴西市场推出的草甘膦除草剂的环境风险生态毒理学评估:基于植物的生物分析的观点。
本研究确定了两种草甘膦除草剂(GBHs)的植物毒性和细胞遗传学效应:XEQUE MATE HT IHARA®(限制农业使用- GBHn)和CITROMAX MAX 20(用于园艺,面向公众销售- gbg)。采用4种非靶种(Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Pennisetum glaucum, Hordeum vulgare)和1种靶种(Bidens pilosa)进行植物毒性生物测定。两种GBHs均显著降低了种子发芽率(G%)、发芽速度指数(GSI)、鲜质量(FM)和幼苗生长(SG),且呈剂量依赖性。SG是最敏感的终点,两种GBHs在480 mg/L时均降低99%以上。毛毛拜登对GBHn的敏感性指数最高(SI = 0.93,对gbg的敏感性指数为0.8),证实了靶特异性。总体SI相似(GBHn的OSI = 0.75; GBHg的OSI = 0.72),表明毒性相当。使用葱属植物的细胞遗传学分析显示,在较高浓度下,有丝分裂指数(MI)显著降低(在较高剂量下降低40%),染色体改变有限,但微核(MN)显著增加(每1000个细胞中高达6个)。GBHn比GBHg诱导更多的MN形成,提示更大的遗传毒性。尽管植物毒性相似,但GBHn较高的遗传毒性值得关注。这些结果表明,使用这两种配方的除草剂会带来环境风险,并强调需要对草甘膦除草剂进行严格的监管审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A , Current Issues is an authoritative journal that features strictly refereed original research in the field of environmental sciences, public and occupational health, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信