Using machine learning to predict concussion recovery time: The importance of psychological and symptomatic factors.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ellen Taylor, Logan Shurtz, Stephen C Bunt, Nyaz Didehbani, C Munro Cullum, Kristin Wilmoth
{"title":"Using machine learning to predict concussion recovery time: The importance of psychological and symptomatic factors.","authors":"Ellen Taylor, Logan Shurtz, Stephen C Bunt, Nyaz Didehbani, C Munro Cullum, Kristin Wilmoth","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2547933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives were threefold: 1) To utilize machine learning (ML) to create a model for predicting concussion recovery time using routine clinical metrics, 2) To compare predictive factors within a ML model to previously identified risk factors, and 3) To compare predictive ability of ML models to traditional logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>North Texas Concussion Registry (ConTex) data were prospectively collected during an initial post-injury clinic visit and 3-month follow-up. ML models classified 1000 participants with sport- or recreation-related injuries, ages 6-59, into ordinal recovery time groups. Models were trained on an 80-20 train-test split with 5-fold cross validation. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC). Feature predictive importance was measured using Leave One Feature Out (LOFO) metrics and Permutation Feature Importance (PFI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A CatBoost binary ML model classified participants into ≤14-d or >14-d recovery with an AUC of 0.79, similar to the logistic regression AUC of 0.77. In contrast, the multiclass model for recovery time had a lower AUC of 0.69. Time to clinic, symptom severity, and factors related to self-reported depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep quality had the largest feature importance values in the CatBoost model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-injury depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep had a stronger influence in predicting prolonged recovery time than previously identified injury-related variables (e.g. loss of consciousness, headache). While promising, ML may not outperform traditional models depending on the simplicity and linearity of the predictor variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2547933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives were threefold: 1) To utilize machine learning (ML) to create a model for predicting concussion recovery time using routine clinical metrics, 2) To compare predictive factors within a ML model to previously identified risk factors, and 3) To compare predictive ability of ML models to traditional logistic regression.

Methods: North Texas Concussion Registry (ConTex) data were prospectively collected during an initial post-injury clinic visit and 3-month follow-up. ML models classified 1000 participants with sport- or recreation-related injuries, ages 6-59, into ordinal recovery time groups. Models were trained on an 80-20 train-test split with 5-fold cross validation. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC). Feature predictive importance was measured using Leave One Feature Out (LOFO) metrics and Permutation Feature Importance (PFI).

Results: A CatBoost binary ML model classified participants into ≤14-d or >14-d recovery with an AUC of 0.79, similar to the logistic regression AUC of 0.77. In contrast, the multiclass model for recovery time had a lower AUC of 0.69. Time to clinic, symptom severity, and factors related to self-reported depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep quality had the largest feature importance values in the CatBoost model.

Conclusions: Post-injury depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep had a stronger influence in predicting prolonged recovery time than previously identified injury-related variables (e.g. loss of consciousness, headache). While promising, ML may not outperform traditional models depending on the simplicity and linearity of the predictor variables.

使用机器学习预测脑震荡恢复时间:心理和症状因素的重要性。
目的:目标有三个:1)利用机器学习(ML)创建一个使用常规临床指标预测脑震荡恢复时间的模型;2)将ML模型中的预测因素与先前确定的风险因素进行比较;3)将ML模型的预测能力与传统逻辑回归进行比较。方法:前瞻性地收集北德克萨斯州脑震荡登记处(ConTex)的数据,在初次损伤后门诊就诊和3个月的随访期间。ML模型将1000名6-59岁的运动或娱乐相关损伤参与者分为正常恢复时间组。模型在80-20训练测试分割上进行训练,并进行5倍交叉验证。使用曲线下面积(AUC)评估性能。特征预测重要性是使用遗漏一个特征(LOFO)指标和排列特征重要性(PFI)来衡量的。结果:CatBoost二元ML模型将参与者分为≤14-d或>14-d恢复,AUC为0.79,与logistic回归AUC为0.77相似。相比之下,恢复时间的多类模型的AUC较低,为0.69。在CatBoost模型中,到诊所的时间、症状严重程度以及与自我报告的抑郁症状、焦虑和睡眠质量相关的因素具有最大的特征重要性值。结论:损伤后抑郁症状、焦虑和睡眠比先前确定的损伤相关变量(如意识丧失、头痛)对预测恢复时间延长有更大的影响。虽然很有希望,但ML可能不会优于传统模型,这取决于预测变量的简单性和线性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信