Evaluation of strategies for the diagnosis of Chagas disease in an endemic area: SaMi-Trop study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ingredy Carolline de Jesus Santos, Cesar Augusto Taconeli, Ester Cerdeira Sabino, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Andréia Brito de Souza, Ana Beatriz Cardoso Sena, Dardiane Santos Cruz, Sâmara Fernandes Leite, Ana Clara de Jesus Santos, Amanda Mota Lacerda, Luciano de Freitas Fernandes, Desirée Sant'Ana Haikal, Israel Molina Romero, Diego Dias de Araújo, Ariela Mota Ferreira
{"title":"Evaluation of strategies for the diagnosis of Chagas disease in an endemic area: SaMi-Trop study.","authors":"Ingredy Carolline de Jesus Santos, Cesar Augusto Taconeli, Ester Cerdeira Sabino, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Andréia Brito de Souza, Ana Beatriz Cardoso Sena, Dardiane Santos Cruz, Sâmara Fernandes Leite, Ana Clara de Jesus Santos, Amanda Mota Lacerda, Luciano de Freitas Fernandes, Desirée Sant'Ana Haikal, Israel Molina Romero, Diego Dias de Araújo, Ariela Mota Ferreira","doi":"10.1590/S1678-9946202567055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate strategies for diagnosing Chagas disease (CD) using rapid tests and risk questions in an endemic area. This is an analytical cross-sectional study conducted with 751 individuals from two municipalities in an endemic region for CD in the North of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Participants answered a questionnaire with personal information and the risk criteria for CD infection recommended by the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for Chagas disease (PCDT). Subsequently, they underwent capillary blood collection for the rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Individuals with a positive RDT result, along with negative controls, underwent venipuncture for serological testing. The mean age of participants was 51.4 (±18.2) years, most were female (n=434/57.8%). In the RDT, 699 (93.1%) individuals tested negative; of these, 109 (15.6%) underwent serology and 4 (3.7%) tested positive. Among the 52 (6.9%) individuals with a positive RDT result, 48 (94.1%) had their result confirmed by the serological tests. RDT result, age, and risk factors-except for blood transfusion before 1992-were statistically associated with positive serology for CD. The RDT demonstrated high sensitivity (0.92; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92) and specificity (0.97; 95%CI: 0.92-0.99).</p>","PeriodicalId":54466,"journal":{"name":"Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo","volume":"67 ","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946202567055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate strategies for diagnosing Chagas disease (CD) using rapid tests and risk questions in an endemic area. This is an analytical cross-sectional study conducted with 751 individuals from two municipalities in an endemic region for CD in the North of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Participants answered a questionnaire with personal information and the risk criteria for CD infection recommended by the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for Chagas disease (PCDT). Subsequently, they underwent capillary blood collection for the rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Individuals with a positive RDT result, along with negative controls, underwent venipuncture for serological testing. The mean age of participants was 51.4 (±18.2) years, most were female (n=434/57.8%). In the RDT, 699 (93.1%) individuals tested negative; of these, 109 (15.6%) underwent serology and 4 (3.7%) tested positive. Among the 52 (6.9%) individuals with a positive RDT result, 48 (94.1%) had their result confirmed by the serological tests. RDT result, age, and risk factors-except for blood transfusion before 1992-were statistically associated with positive serology for CD. The RDT demonstrated high sensitivity (0.92; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92) and specificity (0.97; 95%CI: 0.92-0.99).

Abstract Image

地方病地区恰加斯病诊断策略评价:SaMi-Trop研究。
本研究旨在评估在流行地区使用快速检测和风险问题诊断恰加斯病(CD)的策略。这是一项对来自巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州北部CD流行区的两个城市的751人进行的分析性横断面研究。参与者回答了一份问卷,其中包含个人信息和查加斯病临床方案和治疗指南(PCDT)推荐的CD感染风险标准。随后,他们接受了毛细管采血进行快速诊断试验(RDT)。RDT结果阳性的个体以及阴性对照者接受静脉穿刺进行血清学检测。参与者平均年龄为51.4(±18.2)岁,以女性居多(n=434/57.8%)。在RDT中,699人(93.1%)呈阴性;其中109例(15.6%)接受血清学检查,4例(3.7%)阳性。在52例(6.9%)RDT阳性个体中,48例(94.1%)血清学检测结果得到证实。RDT结果、年龄和危险因素(1992年以前输血者除外)与CD血清学阳性有统计学相关性。RDT具有高敏感性(0.92;95%CI: 0.81-0.92)和特异性(0.97;95%CI: 0.92-0.99)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo (Journal of the São Paulo Institute of Tropical Medicine) is a journal devoted to research on different aspects of tropical infectious diseases. The journal welcomes original work on all infectious diseases, provided that data and results are directly linked to human health. The journal publishes, besides original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the editor. The journal publishes manuscripts only in English. From 2016 on, the Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo (Journal of the São Paulo Institute of Tropical Medicine) is published online only, maintaining the free access. For more information visit: - http://www.scielo.br/rimtsp - http://www.imt.usp.br/revista-imt/
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信