{"title":"The clinical utility of assessing coronary vasomotor dysfunction in angina with nonobstructive coronary artery.","authors":"Kai Nogami, Lilach O Lerman, Amir Lerman","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This paper reviews the current understanding of coronary vascular dysfunction (CVDys) in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), based on recent findings from a comprehensive, large-scale study. It also discusses potential future directions for research and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>CVDys involves enhanced vasoconstriction or impaired vasodilation caused by endothelium-dependent and/or -independent dysfunction in the epicardial or microvascular coronary arteries. It is classified into four subtypes based on anatomical location and underlying mechanisms, and can be assessed using coronary reactivity testing (CRT). Previous studies have evaluated their prognostic implications separately or in limited populations.A recent study assessed all subtypes within a single ANOCA cohort and confirmed that endothelium-dependent epicardial dysfunction and both types of microvascular dysfunction are associated with worse prognosis. Moreover, it demonstrated that microvascular function - both endothelium-dependent and -independent - serves as an independent prognostic factor for major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings emphasize the value of CRT-based comprehensive evaluation for risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While evidence regarding the prognostic impact of CVDys has become increasingly robust, effective treatment strategies remain undefined. Future efforts should focus on developing CRT-guided interventions targeting coronary dysfunction, with the goal of improving clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"440-447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This paper reviews the current understanding of coronary vascular dysfunction (CVDys) in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), based on recent findings from a comprehensive, large-scale study. It also discusses potential future directions for research and clinical practice.
Recent findings: CVDys involves enhanced vasoconstriction or impaired vasodilation caused by endothelium-dependent and/or -independent dysfunction in the epicardial or microvascular coronary arteries. It is classified into four subtypes based on anatomical location and underlying mechanisms, and can be assessed using coronary reactivity testing (CRT). Previous studies have evaluated their prognostic implications separately or in limited populations.A recent study assessed all subtypes within a single ANOCA cohort and confirmed that endothelium-dependent epicardial dysfunction and both types of microvascular dysfunction are associated with worse prognosis. Moreover, it demonstrated that microvascular function - both endothelium-dependent and -independent - serves as an independent prognostic factor for major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings emphasize the value of CRT-based comprehensive evaluation for risk stratification.
Summary: While evidence regarding the prognostic impact of CVDys has become increasingly robust, effective treatment strategies remain undefined. Future efforts should focus on developing CRT-guided interventions targeting coronary dysfunction, with the goal of improving clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.