Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review in Palliative and End-of-Life Care.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Cara L Wallace, Stephanie P Wladkowski, Ruaa Al-Juboori, Anna Wingo, Kathryn W Coccia, Rebecca Hyde, Verna Hendricks-Ferguson
{"title":"Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review in Palliative and End-of-Life Care.","authors":"Cara L Wallace, Stephanie P Wladkowski, Ruaa Al-Juboori, Anna Wingo, Kathryn W Coccia, Rebecca Hyde, Verna Hendricks-Ferguson","doi":"10.1097/NJH.0000000000001140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research participation of hospice and palliative care patients and family caregivers is essential to develop and test best practices. Yet, healthcare professionals are often hesitant to ask patients and caregivers to participate in research, fearing it is too intrusive or unethical during a sensitive time. This review focused on the motivating factors, benefits, and burdens of research participation for patients with serious illness and their family caregivers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Checklist, searches were conducted in 4 online databases for articles between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2024. The team reviewed 3169 articles; 28 met inclusion criteria and findings were extracted and synthesized using the Joanna Briggs Institute's mixed-method systematic reviews methodology following evaluation of each study. Results suggest greater benefits than burdens, reporting value in participation even when a burden is experienced. Burdens point to important social determinants of health concerns in research participation. For clinicians and researchers, connecting patients and caregivers to palliative and end-of-life research may be both beneficial as a contribution to scientific literature and as an additional source of ongoing support.</p>","PeriodicalId":54807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"E211-E224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research participation of hospice and palliative care patients and family caregivers is essential to develop and test best practices. Yet, healthcare professionals are often hesitant to ask patients and caregivers to participate in research, fearing it is too intrusive or unethical during a sensitive time. This review focused on the motivating factors, benefits, and burdens of research participation for patients with serious illness and their family caregivers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Checklist, searches were conducted in 4 online databases for articles between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2024. The team reviewed 3169 articles; 28 met inclusion criteria and findings were extracted and synthesized using the Joanna Briggs Institute's mixed-method systematic reviews methodology following evaluation of each study. Results suggest greater benefits than burdens, reporting value in participation even when a burden is experienced. Burdens point to important social determinants of health concerns in research participation. For clinicians and researchers, connecting patients and caregivers to palliative and end-of-life research may be both beneficial as a contribution to scientific literature and as an additional source of ongoing support.

参与研究的益处与负担:缓和与临终关怀的混合方法系统回顾。
安宁疗护和缓和疗护病人及家属照护者的研究参与,对于发展和测试最佳做法至关重要。然而,医疗保健专业人员往往不愿要求患者和护理人员参与研究,担心在敏感时期这太过侵入或不道德。本综述的重点是对重症患者及其家庭照顾者参与研究的激励因素、益处和负担。使用系统评价和荟萃分析清单的首选报告项目,在4个在线数据库中检索2015年1月1日至2024年1月31日之间的文章。该团队审阅了3169篇文章;28项符合纳入标准,在对每项研究进行评估后,使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的混合方法系统评价方法提取和综合研究结果。结果表明,即使经历了负担,参与的益处大于负担,报告价值也更大。负担指出了研究参与中健康问题的重要社会决定因素。对于临床医生和研究人员来说,将患者和护理人员与姑息治疗和临终研究联系起来,作为对科学文献的贡献和作为持续支持的额外来源,可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing (JHPN) is the official journal of the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association and is the professional, peer-reviewed journal for nurses in hospice and palliative care settings. Focusing on the clinical, educational and research aspects of care, JHPN offers current and reliable information on end of life nursing. Feature articles in areas such as symptom management, ethics, and futility of care address holistic care across the continuum. Book and article reviews, clinical updates and case studies create a journal that meets the didactic and practical needs of the nurse caring for patients with serious illnesses in advanced stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信