C. Aumeran , L. Hamilton , L. Jamieson , E. Speake , S.J. Dancer
{"title":"What is the viable microbiome of the healthcare toilet?","authors":"C. Aumeran , L. Hamilton , L. Jamieson , E. Speake , S.J. Dancer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Flushing water toilets in hospitals cater for staff and patients, including disabled and unisex facilities. The recent introduction of unisex toilets has highlighted potential microbiological risks between different bathroom facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This project sought to establish the cultivable microbiome in all types of healthcare toilet.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic sampling was performed using quantitative and qualitative microbiology within a multi-site longitudinal study. Hand-touch sites, low sites (floors) and high sites (ceilings) in male/female staff and patient, unisex and disabled facilities were screened in three hospitals. Aerobic colony count (ACC) was determined alongside identification of key pathogens (<em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, Enterobacterales, enterococci, stenotrophomonas, acinetobacter and fungi). Bacterial pathogens were tested for antimicrobial susceptibilities.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Expected environmental and skin flora were present at all sites. Bioburden was heaviest on floors, closely followed by ceilings. Hand-touch sites were cleanest (<2.5 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup>) in all toilets (<em>P=</em>0.003), with those in female toilets cleaner than in male toilets (<em>P=</em>0.008). Highest bioburden overall (>12 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup>) occurred in unisex toilets, followed by male toilets. Flora at high sites was almost identical to that on floors. Bacterial pathogens, including resistant bacteria, were concentrated on patient floors, with 80% isolated alongside ACC>2.5 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup>. Seven of eight <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> were recovered from gender-neutral toilets. <em>S. aureus</em> predominated on floors and hand-touch sites in male staff and disabled toilets (<em>P=</em>0.02 and <em>P</em><0.001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cleaning frequencies should be modelled against higher bioburden (unisex) and risk of pathogens (patient toilets). Similar flora on floors and ceilings suggested aerosolization during flushing. The data provides evidence to inform bathroom design, designation and decontamination practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 48-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125002506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Flushing water toilets in hospitals cater for staff and patients, including disabled and unisex facilities. The recent introduction of unisex toilets has highlighted potential microbiological risks between different bathroom facilities.
Aim
This project sought to establish the cultivable microbiome in all types of healthcare toilet.
Methods
Systematic sampling was performed using quantitative and qualitative microbiology within a multi-site longitudinal study. Hand-touch sites, low sites (floors) and high sites (ceilings) in male/female staff and patient, unisex and disabled facilities were screened in three hospitals. Aerobic colony count (ACC) was determined alongside identification of key pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacterales, enterococci, stenotrophomonas, acinetobacter and fungi). Bacterial pathogens were tested for antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Findings
Expected environmental and skin flora were present at all sites. Bioburden was heaviest on floors, closely followed by ceilings. Hand-touch sites were cleanest (<2.5 cfu/cm2) in all toilets (P=0.003), with those in female toilets cleaner than in male toilets (P=0.008). Highest bioburden overall (>12 cfu/cm2) occurred in unisex toilets, followed by male toilets. Flora at high sites was almost identical to that on floors. Bacterial pathogens, including resistant bacteria, were concentrated on patient floors, with 80% isolated alongside ACC>2.5 cfu/cm2. Seven of eight Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were recovered from gender-neutral toilets. S. aureus predominated on floors and hand-touch sites in male staff and disabled toilets (P=0.02 and P<0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
Cleaning frequencies should be modelled against higher bioburden (unisex) and risk of pathogens (patient toilets). Similar flora on floors and ceilings suggested aerosolization during flushing. The data provides evidence to inform bathroom design, designation and decontamination practices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.