H. Almadhoon , I. Ahmad , W.W.Y. Lee , A. Matthews , E.R. Carter , J.A. Otter , D.M. Lecky , A.H. Holmes , N.J. Zhu
{"title":"Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in healthcare and community settings in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"H. Almadhoon , I. Ahmad , W.W.Y. Lee , A. Matthews , E.R. Carter , J.A. Otter , D.M. Lecky , A.H. Holmes , N.J. Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CP-CRE) pose a growing threat in the UK, with increasing prevalence in recent years associated with higher morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. This review synthesizes evidence in the prevalence of CP-CRE in UK healthcare and community settings. A systematic review was conducted across major five databases and two preprint websites until 14<sup>th</sup> February 2024. Eligible records were assessed in Covidence, with metadata extracted and quality evaluated using an adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Pooled CP-CRE prevalence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using chi<sup><em>2</em></sup> and <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup><em>,</em>where the Q statistic followed an X<sup>2</sup> distribution (with k-1 degrees of freedom). Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plot, with sensitivity analyses performed. Among 1344 screened records, 32 studies were included. The overall pooled prevalence of CRE and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in healthcare settings was 1.17% (95%Cl 0.29–2.51%, <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 99.70%, <em>N</em> = 171,107) and 1.06% (95%Cl 0.59–1.64%; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 97.60, <em>N</em> = 263,833), respectively. CPE pooled prevalence was higher in healthcare carriage samples at 1.23% (95%Cl: 0.68–1.91%; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 98.10%; <em>N</em> = 262,524) than infection samples at 0.03% (95%Cl: 0.00–0.37%; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.00%; <em>N</em> = 888). Risk-based admission screening identified a higher CPE proportion of 1.27% (95%Cl: 0.97–1.60%; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = <em>67.30%; N</em> = 24,763) compared with universal hospital screening at 0.82% (95%Cl: 0.28–1.65%; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 97.90%; <em>N</em> = 232,033). In the community, only two studies reported CPE prevalence (0.11%; 95%Cl: 0.00–0.79%; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 52.60; <em>N</em> = 2630) from carriage samples using point prevalence surveys, showing low prevalence. This review provides an overview of CP-CRE prevalence across healthcare and community settings in the UK. Our findings support the national surveillance of CP-CRE in the UK, enabling more targeted screening efforts for CP-CRE detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019567012500249X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CP-CRE) pose a growing threat in the UK, with increasing prevalence in recent years associated with higher morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. This review synthesizes evidence in the prevalence of CP-CRE in UK healthcare and community settings. A systematic review was conducted across major five databases and two preprint websites until 14th February 2024. Eligible records were assessed in Covidence, with metadata extracted and quality evaluated using an adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Pooled CP-CRE prevalence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using chi2 and I2,where the Q statistic followed an X2 distribution (with k-1 degrees of freedom). Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plot, with sensitivity analyses performed. Among 1344 screened records, 32 studies were included. The overall pooled prevalence of CRE and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in healthcare settings was 1.17% (95%Cl 0.29–2.51%, I2 = 99.70%, N = 171,107) and 1.06% (95%Cl 0.59–1.64%; I2 = 97.60, N = 263,833), respectively. CPE pooled prevalence was higher in healthcare carriage samples at 1.23% (95%Cl: 0.68–1.91%; I2 = 98.10%; N = 262,524) than infection samples at 0.03% (95%Cl: 0.00–0.37%; I2 = 0.00%; N = 888). Risk-based admission screening identified a higher CPE proportion of 1.27% (95%Cl: 0.97–1.60%; I2 = 67.30%; N = 24,763) compared with universal hospital screening at 0.82% (95%Cl: 0.28–1.65%; I2 = 97.90%; N = 232,033). In the community, only two studies reported CPE prevalence (0.11%; 95%Cl: 0.00–0.79%; I2 = 52.60; N = 2630) from carriage samples using point prevalence surveys, showing low prevalence. This review provides an overview of CP-CRE prevalence across healthcare and community settings in the UK. Our findings support the national surveillance of CP-CRE in the UK, enabling more targeted screening efforts for CP-CRE detection.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.