Anxiety and its coping mechanisms among engineering and medical students: a comparative study.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maryam Tariq, Muhammad Arham, Humayun Suqrat, Qaisar Sohail
{"title":"Anxiety and its coping mechanisms among engineering and medical students: a comparative study.","authors":"Maryam Tariq, Muhammad Arham, Humayun Suqrat, Qaisar Sohail","doi":"10.47391/JPMA.21001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the frequency of anxiety and its coping mechanism among medical and engineering students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 in Faisalabad, Pakistan, and comprised students from two medical and two engineering education institutions. Within the two subsets, one was a public-sector institution and the other was in the private sector. Data was collected using Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Brief Cope Inventory. Data was Analysed using SPSS 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study subjects ranged between 17-26 years of age and 144(36%) of them were females. Of the 400 subjects, 200(50%) were medical students and the rest were engineering students uniformly representing all years of education. Also, 200(50%) responses were from private-sector institutions and the rest were from public-sector institutions. Mild anxiety was present in 220(55%) subjects, more in engineering students. Moderate anxiety was found in 98(24.5%) students, most in public-sector medical institutions. Minimal and severe anxiety were noted in 56(14%) and 26(6.50%) subjects, respectively. Medical and engineering students showed the same patterns of coping mechanisms, with planning (2.55±0.69) being the most adopted, and substance abuse (1.78±0.68) the least.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Except for mild anxiety, all other groups of anxiety levels were found to be higher among medical students. In terms of coping behaviour, there was no difference between medical and engineering students.</p>","PeriodicalId":54369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","volume":"75 8","pages":"1320-1326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.21001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the frequency of anxiety and its coping mechanism among medical and engineering students.

Methods: The comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 in Faisalabad, Pakistan, and comprised students from two medical and two engineering education institutions. Within the two subsets, one was a public-sector institution and the other was in the private sector. Data was collected using Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Brief Cope Inventory. Data was Analysed using SPSS 27.

Results: Study subjects ranged between 17-26 years of age and 144(36%) of them were females. Of the 400 subjects, 200(50%) were medical students and the rest were engineering students uniformly representing all years of education. Also, 200(50%) responses were from private-sector institutions and the rest were from public-sector institutions. Mild anxiety was present in 220(55%) subjects, more in engineering students. Moderate anxiety was found in 98(24.5%) students, most in public-sector medical institutions. Minimal and severe anxiety were noted in 56(14%) and 26(6.50%) subjects, respectively. Medical and engineering students showed the same patterns of coping mechanisms, with planning (2.55±0.69) being the most adopted, and substance abuse (1.78±0.68) the least.

Conclusions: Except for mild anxiety, all other groups of anxiety levels were found to be higher among medical students. In terms of coping behaviour, there was no difference between medical and engineering students.

工科和医科学生焦虑及其应对机制的比较研究。
目的:了解医、工科学生焦虑的发生频率及其应对机制。方法:比较横断面研究于2023年4月至9月在巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德进行,包括来自两所医学和两所工程教育机构的学生。在这两个子集中,一个是公共部门机构,另一个是私营部门机构。使用广泛性焦虑障碍-7和简短应对量表收集数据。数据采用SPSS 27进行分析。结果:研究对象年龄在17-26岁之间,其中144人(36%)为女性。在400名受试者中,200名(50%)是医学院学生,其余是工程专业的学生,他们统一代表了所有年级的教育。此外,200份(50%)答复来自私营机构,其余来自公共部门机构。220名(55%)受试者存在轻度焦虑,工科学生居多。98名(24.5%)学生存在中度焦虑,其中大部分来自公共医疗机构。轻度焦虑和重度焦虑分别在56名(14%)和26名(6.50%)受试者中出现。医、工科学生的应对机制表现出相同的模式,以计划(2.55±0.69)最多,药物滥用(1.78±0.68)最少。结论:医学生除轻度焦虑外,其余各组焦虑水平均较高。在应对行为方面,医学生和工科学生没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
983
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Primarily being a medical journal, JPMA publishes scholarly research focusing on the various fields in the areas of health and medical education. It publishes original research describing recent advances in health particularly clinical studies, clinical trials, assessments of pathogens of diagnostic importance, medical genetics and epidemiological studies. Review articles highlighting importance of various issues in the domain of public health, drug research and medical education are also accepted. As a leading journal of South Asia, JPMA remains cognizant of the recent advances in the rapidly growing fields of biomedical sciences, it invites and encourages scholars to write short reviews and invited editorials on the emerging issues. We particularly aim to promote health standards of developing countries by encouraging manuscript submissions on issues affecting the public health and health delivery services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信