{"title":"Effects of Socioeconomic Factors on Visual Outcome and Management of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients.","authors":"Normila Barthelemy, Prashant Tailor, Jayanth Sridhar, Thilani Samarakoon, Jesse D Sengillo","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) outcomes and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 1449 patients diagnosed with nAMD, treated with anti-VEGF between January 2016-January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower income was associated with poorer baseline (p < .001) and final (p < .001) BCVA. Worse final visual acuity correlated with lower baseline BCVA (p < .001), lower income (p = .05) and older age (p < .001); insurance type did not (p = .558). Non-Hispanic/non-Latino patients exhibited a higher rate of delayed injections per scheduled visit than Hispanics (p =.002). Ethnicity correlated with insurance status (p = .008); Hispanic or Latino patients more often had Medicaid or commercial insurance; non-Hispanics/non-Latino patients more often had Medicare. Higher-income patients were more likely to receive aflibercept (p < .001) and faricimab (p =.021). Hispanic or Latino were more likely to receive bevacizumab (OR 2.49; p < .001), but insurance type modified this association (OR 3.42; p = .010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower income correlated with worse nAMD visual outcomes, and the type of anti-VEGF treatment used varied across income and ethnicity groups, but not insurance type.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) outcomes and management.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1449 patients diagnosed with nAMD, treated with anti-VEGF between January 2016-January 2024.
Results: Lower income was associated with poorer baseline (p < .001) and final (p < .001) BCVA. Worse final visual acuity correlated with lower baseline BCVA (p < .001), lower income (p = .05) and older age (p < .001); insurance type did not (p = .558). Non-Hispanic/non-Latino patients exhibited a higher rate of delayed injections per scheduled visit than Hispanics (p =.002). Ethnicity correlated with insurance status (p = .008); Hispanic or Latino patients more often had Medicaid or commercial insurance; non-Hispanics/non-Latino patients more often had Medicare. Higher-income patients were more likely to receive aflibercept (p < .001) and faricimab (p =.021). Hispanic or Latino were more likely to receive bevacizumab (OR 2.49; p < .001), but insurance type modified this association (OR 3.42; p = .010).
Conclusions: Lower income correlated with worse nAMD visual outcomes, and the type of anti-VEGF treatment used varied across income and ethnicity groups, but not insurance type.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.