Can Conditioning Activity with Blood Flow Restriction Impact Neuromuscular Performance and Perceptual Responses to Exercise?

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.3390/sports13080243
Robson Conceição Silva, Leandro Lima Sousa, Hugo de Luca Correa, Thailson Fernandes Silva, Lucas de Souza Martins, Pedro Felix, Martim Bottaro, Denis César Leite Vieira, Carlos Ernesto
{"title":"Can Conditioning Activity with Blood Flow Restriction Impact Neuromuscular Performance and Perceptual Responses to Exercise?","authors":"Robson Conceição Silva, Leandro Lima Sousa, Hugo de Luca Correa, Thailson Fernandes Silva, Lucas de Souza Martins, Pedro Felix, Martim Bottaro, Denis César Leite Vieira, Carlos Ernesto","doi":"10.3390/sports13080243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-load conditioning activity with blood flow restriction has been addressed as an efficient method to enhance an individual's performance during their main exercise activity. However, the optimal degree of blood flow restriction remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the acute effects of low-load conditioning activity with different degrees of blood flow restriction on muscle strength, power, and perceived exertion. Twenty recreationally trained men (20.9 ± 2.3 years) participated in a randomized crossover design including three conditions: control, low-load blood flow restriction at 50%, and 75% of total arterial occlusion pressure. Participants performed squats (three sets of ten reps) followed by isokinetic assessments of the knee flexor and extensor performance at 7 and 10-min post-exercise. The session rating of perceived exertion (SRPE) was recorded 30 min after each session. No significant effects were observed for condition, time, or their interaction on peak torque, total work, or average power (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, SRPE was significantly higher in the 75% BFR condition compared to both the 50% BFR and control conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with no difference between the 50% BFR and control. These findings suggest that low-load conditioning activity with blood flow restriction does not acutely enhance neuromuscular performance. However, a higher degree of restriction increases perceived exertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-load conditioning activity with blood flow restriction has been addressed as an efficient method to enhance an individual's performance during their main exercise activity. However, the optimal degree of blood flow restriction remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the acute effects of low-load conditioning activity with different degrees of blood flow restriction on muscle strength, power, and perceived exertion. Twenty recreationally trained men (20.9 ± 2.3 years) participated in a randomized crossover design including three conditions: control, low-load blood flow restriction at 50%, and 75% of total arterial occlusion pressure. Participants performed squats (three sets of ten reps) followed by isokinetic assessments of the knee flexor and extensor performance at 7 and 10-min post-exercise. The session rating of perceived exertion (SRPE) was recorded 30 min after each session. No significant effects were observed for condition, time, or their interaction on peak torque, total work, or average power (p < 0.05). However, SRPE was significantly higher in the 75% BFR condition compared to both the 50% BFR and control conditions (p < 0.05), with no difference between the 50% BFR and control. These findings suggest that low-load conditioning activity with blood flow restriction does not acutely enhance neuromuscular performance. However, a higher degree of restriction increases perceived exertion.

Abstract Image

血液流动受限的调节活动是否会影响运动后神经肌肉的表现和知觉反应?
低负荷调节活动与血流限制已被认为是一种有效的方法,以提高个人的表现,在他们的主要运动活动。然而,限制血流的最佳程度仍不清楚。因此,本研究探讨了不同程度血流限制的低负荷条件运动对肌肉力量、力量和感觉用力的急性影响。20名接受娱乐训练的男性(20.9±2.3岁)参加了随机交叉设计,包括三种条件:对照组、低负荷血流限制在50%和动脉总闭塞压的75%。参与者进行深蹲(三组,每组10次),然后在运动后7分钟和10分钟对膝关节屈肌和伸肌的表现进行等速评估。在每次训练后30分钟记录感知运动强度评分(SRPE)。条件、时间或它们的相互作用对峰值扭矩、总功或平均功率没有显著影响(p < 0.05)。然而,75% BFR组SRPE显著高于50% BFR组和对照组(p < 0.05), 50% BFR组与对照组无差异。这些研究结果表明,低负荷条件活动与血流限制并不能显著提高神经肌肉的表现。然而,更高程度的限制会增加人们对运动强度的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信