Comparison of Lower Limb COP and Muscle Activation During Single-Leg Deadlift Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.3390/sports13080242
Jihwan Jeong, Ilbong Park
{"title":"Comparison of Lower Limb COP and Muscle Activation During Single-Leg Deadlift Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells.","authors":"Jihwan Jeong, Ilbong Park","doi":"10.3390/sports13080242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how barbell type (elastic vs. inelastic) and lifting speed affect postural stability and lower limb muscle activation during the single-leg deadlift (SLDL), a common unilateral exercise in rehabilitation and performance training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven healthy adults performed SLDLs using both elastic and inelastic barbells under three lifting speeds (normal, fast, and power). Center of pressure (COP) displacement in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions and electromyographic (EMG) activity of eight lower limb muscles were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COP displacement was significantly lower when using elastic barbells (AP: F = 6.509, <i>p</i> = 0.017, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.200, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.278, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.243). EMG activation was significantly higher for the gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius (all <i>p</i> < 0.01), especially under power conditions. Significant interactions between barbell type and speed were found for the gluteus medius (F = 13.737, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.346, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.176), semitendinosus (F = 6.757, <i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.206, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.080), and tibialis anterior (F = 3.617, <i>p</i> = 0.034, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.122, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that elastic barbells improve postural control and enhance neuromuscular activation during the SLDL, particularly at higher speeds. These results support the integration of elastic resistance in dynamic balance and injury prevention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate how barbell type (elastic vs. inelastic) and lifting speed affect postural stability and lower limb muscle activation during the single-leg deadlift (SLDL), a common unilateral exercise in rehabilitation and performance training.

Methods: Twenty-seven healthy adults performed SLDLs using both elastic and inelastic barbells under three lifting speeds (normal, fast, and power). Center of pressure (COP) displacement in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions and electromyographic (EMG) activity of eight lower limb muscles were measured.

Results: COP displacement was significantly lower when using elastic barbells (AP: F = 6.509, p = 0.017, η2 = 0.200, ω2 = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.278, ω2 = 0.243). EMG activation was significantly higher for the gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius (all p < 0.01), especially under power conditions. Significant interactions between barbell type and speed were found for the gluteus medius (F = 13.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.346, ω2 = 0.176), semitendinosus (F = 6.757, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.206, ω2 = 0.080), and tibialis anterior (F = 3.617, p = 0.034, η2 = 0.122, ω2 = 0.029).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that elastic barbells improve postural control and enhance neuromuscular activation during the SLDL, particularly at higher speeds. These results support the integration of elastic resistance in dynamic balance and injury prevention programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

弹性和非弹性杠铃单腿硬举时下肢COP和肌肉激活的比较。
背景:本研究旨在探讨杠铃类型(弹性与非弹性)和举重速度对单腿硬举(SLDL)中姿势稳定性和下肢肌肉激活的影响。单腿硬举是康复和性能训练中常见的单侧运动。方法:27名健康成人使用弹性和非弹性杠铃在正常、快速和力量三种举起速度下进行SLDLs。测量8块下肢肌肉前后(AP)、中外侧(ML)方向的压力中心(COP)位移和肌电图(EMG)活动。结果:弹性杠铃可显著降低COP位移(AP: F = 6.509, p = 0.017, η2 = 0.200, ω2 = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.278, ω2 = 0.243)。臀中肌、股二头肌、半腱肌和腓肠肌的肌电活动显著升高(p < 0.01),尤其是在动力条件下。在臀中肌(F = 13.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.346, ω2 = 0.176)、半腱肌(F = 6.757, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.206, ω2 = 0.080)和胫骨前肌(F = 3.617, p = 0.034, η2 = 0.122, ω2 = 0.029)中,杠铃类型与速度之间存在显著的交互作用。结论:研究结果表明,弹性杠铃改善了SLDL期间的姿势控制,并增强了神经肌肉的激活,特别是在更高的速度下。这些结果支持弹性阻力在动态平衡和伤害预防计划的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信