Stimuli presented on the fringe of awareness do not cause proactive interference.

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Neuroscience of Consciousness Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/nc/niaf027
Alberto Avilés, Emre Orun, Howard Bowman
{"title":"Stimuli presented on the fringe of awareness do not cause proactive interference.","authors":"Alberto Avilés, Emre Orun, Howard Bowman","doi":"10.1093/nc/niaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A key question in consciousness studies is what is distinct about a conscious as opposed to a sub-conscious percept. The experiments presented here provide evidence for the hypothesis that only conscious percepts enable the formation of episodic memories. We do this by assessing proactive interference (PI) in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams. Specifically, in a post-stream recognition memory test, we quantify memory for items presented in the RSVP stream close in time to the memory test. PI is demonstrated if performance on long RSVP streams is worse than on short streams, where long streams have many more items presented before the item probed in the recognition memory test. We demonstrate PI on reaction times for slow streams [stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) 350 ms], but not for fast streams (SOA 83 or 100 ms). We investigate the implications of this reaction time difference by fitting drift diffusion models. The failure to see PI in fast streams raises the possibility that stimuli presented below the threshold of awareness are not episodically encoded.</p>","PeriodicalId":52242,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","volume":"2025 1","pages":"niaf027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaf027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key question in consciousness studies is what is distinct about a conscious as opposed to a sub-conscious percept. The experiments presented here provide evidence for the hypothesis that only conscious percepts enable the formation of episodic memories. We do this by assessing proactive interference (PI) in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams. Specifically, in a post-stream recognition memory test, we quantify memory for items presented in the RSVP stream close in time to the memory test. PI is demonstrated if performance on long RSVP streams is worse than on short streams, where long streams have many more items presented before the item probed in the recognition memory test. We demonstrate PI on reaction times for slow streams [stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) 350 ms], but not for fast streams (SOA 83 or 100 ms). We investigate the implications of this reaction time difference by fitting drift diffusion models. The failure to see PI in fast streams raises the possibility that stimuli presented below the threshold of awareness are not episodically encoded.

在意识边缘呈现的刺激不会引起主动干扰。
意识研究中的一个关键问题是,有意识与潜意识感知的区别是什么。这里提出的实验为只有有意识的感知才能形成情景记忆的假设提供了证据。我们通过评估快速串行视觉呈现(RSVP)流中的主动干扰(PI)来做到这一点。具体来说,在流后识别记忆测试中,我们量化了与记忆测试时间接近的RSVP流中出现的项目的记忆。如果长RSVP流的性能比短流差,则证明PI,其中长流在识别记忆测试中探测到的项目之前有更多的项目。我们在慢流(刺激开始异步(SOA) 350毫秒)的反应时间上证明了PI,但在快流(SOA 83或100毫秒)的反应时间上没有证明PI。我们通过拟合漂移扩散模型来研究这种反应时间差的含义。未能在快速流中看到PI,提出了一种可能性,即低于意识阈值的刺激没有被偶然编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience of Consciousness
Neuroscience of Consciousness Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信