Physiological Demands Across Exercise Intensity Domains in Rowing: Implications of Weight Category and Sex Differences.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2025-07-25 DOI:10.3390/sports13080245
Manoel Rios, Ricardo Cardoso, Ana Sofia Monteiro, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Ricardo J Fernandes
{"title":"Physiological Demands Across Exercise Intensity Domains in Rowing: Implications of Weight Category and Sex Differences.","authors":"Manoel Rios, Ricardo Cardoso, Ana Sofia Monteiro, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Ricardo J Fernandes","doi":"10.3390/sports13080245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the physiological demands of trained rowers across four exercise intensity domains (considering the effects of weight category and sex). Twenty-four trained rowers (12 lightweight and 12 heavyweight) performed 7 × 3 min incremental bouts on a Concept2 rowing ergometer (30 W power increases and 60 s rest intervals). Performance, cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses were continuously assessed throughout the experimental protocol to characterize internal load across progressive exercise intensities. Statistical analyses included a repeated measures ANOVA test and independent <i>t</i>-tests (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). Heavyweight rowers exhibited greater absolute anaerobic energy production in the severe domain (41.25 ± 10.39 vs. 32.54 ± 5.92 kJ) (<i>p</i> = 0.02), higher peak metabolic power (up to 1.57 ± 0.30 vs. 1.48 ± 0.30 kW) (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and greater total energy expenditure (up to 277.52 ± 51.23 vs. 266.69 ± 51.59 kJ) (<i>p</i> = 0.001) than lightweight rowers, whereas the latter showed comparable relative cardiorespiratory responses to heavyweights. With respect to sex differences, males demonstrated higher oxygen uptake (from ~43-59 vs. ~34-48 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) (<i>p</i> = 0.001), ventilation (from ~78-146 vs. ~49-99 L·min<sup>-1</sup>) (<i>p</i> = 0.001), metabolic power (from ~1.1-1.7 vs. ~0.7-1.0 kW) (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and energy expenditure (from ~193-305 vs. ~119-209 kJ) (<i>p</i> = 0.001) across all intensity domains. However, blood lactate levels and anaerobic energy contributions were similar between sexes. These findings demonstrated that domain-based physiological profiling effectively differentiates internal responses among rowers by weight category and sex. Heavyweights showed greater absolute energy output, while lightweights demonstrated higher metabolic efficiency. Males had elevated cardiorespiratory and metabolic values, but relative bioenergetic responses were similar across groups. These findings support individualized training based on physiological profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the physiological demands of trained rowers across four exercise intensity domains (considering the effects of weight category and sex). Twenty-four trained rowers (12 lightweight and 12 heavyweight) performed 7 × 3 min incremental bouts on a Concept2 rowing ergometer (30 W power increases and 60 s rest intervals). Performance, cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses were continuously assessed throughout the experimental protocol to characterize internal load across progressive exercise intensities. Statistical analyses included a repeated measures ANOVA test and independent t-tests (p ≤ 0.05). Heavyweight rowers exhibited greater absolute anaerobic energy production in the severe domain (41.25 ± 10.39 vs. 32.54 ± 5.92 kJ) (p = 0.02), higher peak metabolic power (up to 1.57 ± 0.30 vs. 1.48 ± 0.30 kW) (p = 0.001) and greater total energy expenditure (up to 277.52 ± 51.23 vs. 266.69 ± 51.59 kJ) (p = 0.001) than lightweight rowers, whereas the latter showed comparable relative cardiorespiratory responses to heavyweights. With respect to sex differences, males demonstrated higher oxygen uptake (from ~43-59 vs. ~34-48 mL·kg-1·min-1) (p = 0.001), ventilation (from ~78-146 vs. ~49-99 L·min-1) (p = 0.001), metabolic power (from ~1.1-1.7 vs. ~0.7-1.0 kW) (p = 0.001) and energy expenditure (from ~193-305 vs. ~119-209 kJ) (p = 0.001) across all intensity domains. However, blood lactate levels and anaerobic energy contributions were similar between sexes. These findings demonstrated that domain-based physiological profiling effectively differentiates internal responses among rowers by weight category and sex. Heavyweights showed greater absolute energy output, while lightweights demonstrated higher metabolic efficiency. Males had elevated cardiorespiratory and metabolic values, but relative bioenergetic responses were similar across groups. These findings support individualized training based on physiological profiles.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

赛艇运动强度范围内的生理需求:体重类别和性别差异的含义。
我们检查了训练有素的赛艇运动员在四个运动强度域的生理需求(考虑到体重类别和性别的影响)。24名训练有素的赛艇运动员(12名轻量级和12名重量级)在Concept2赛艇力计上进行了7 × 3分钟的增量训练(功率增加30瓦,休息时间60秒)。在整个实验过程中,持续评估表现、心肺和代谢反应,以表征渐进式运动强度的内部负荷。统计分析采用重复计量ANOVA检验和独立t检验(p≤0.05)。重量级赛艇运动员在严重赛区表现出更高的绝对厌氧能量产生(41.25±10.39 vs. 32.54±5.92 kJ) (p = 0.02),更高的峰值代谢能力(高达1.57±0.30 vs. 1.48±0.30 kW) (p = 0.001)和更高的总能量消耗(高达277.52±51.23 vs. 266.69±51.59 kJ) (p = 0.001),而后者表现出与重量级运动员相当的相对心肺反应。就性别差异而言,在所有强度域中,男性表现出更高的摄氧量(从~43 ~ 59 vs ~34 ~ 48 mL·kg-1·min-1) (p = 0.001)、通气量(从~78 ~ 146 vs ~49 ~ 99 L·min-1) (p = 0.001)、代谢能力(从~1.1 ~ 1.7 vs ~0.7 ~ 1.0 kW) (p = 0.001)和能量消耗(从~193 ~ 305 vs ~119 ~ 209 kJ) (p = 0.001)。然而,血乳酸水平和无氧能量的贡献在两性之间是相似的。这些研究结果表明,基于区域的生理分析有效地区分了不同体重类别和性别的赛艇运动员的内部反应。重量级选手表现出更大的绝对能量输出,而轻量级选手表现出更高的代谢效率。男性的心肺和代谢值升高,但相对的生物能量反应在各组之间相似。这些发现支持基于生理特征的个性化训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信