ChatGPT: the essential patient's companion for transesophageal echocardiogram education.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuval Avidan, Hussein Sliman, Baruch Weizman, Orel Ben Court, Alexander Fuks, Salim Adawi, Amir Aker
{"title":"ChatGPT: the essential patient's companion for transesophageal echocardiogram education.","authors":"Yuval Avidan, Hussein Sliman, Baruch Weizman, Orel Ben Court, Alexander Fuks, Salim Adawi, Amir Aker","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01071-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) necessitates meticulous patient preparation. Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, hold promise in delivering medical information. This study sought to assess the suitability of the latest iteration, ChatGPT-4 Omni (GPT-4o), as a supplemental resource for providing information on topics related to TOE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty questions pertaining to patient education, covering both fundamental knowledge (25) and management aspects (25) of TOE results, were submitted to GPT-4o in three separate sessions. Three senior echocardiographers systematically evaluated the responses using a four-point scale, focusing on their appropriateness, clarity, and consistency. Additionally, they assessed confabulations and the omission of relevant content on a binary scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 94% of GPT-4o's responses were rated as \"highly appropriate\" across 50 tasks, with 98% deemed \"highly comprehensible\". Responses related to basic knowledge were 96% appropriate and 100% comprehensible, while management-related responses were 92% appropriate and 96% comprehensible. In total, two responses (4%) were rated negatively as quite inappropriate. Minor inconsistencies were observed in 12% of regenerated responses, with relevant content missing in 6% of inquiries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPT-4o demonstrated high accuracy and reliability in addressing patient inquiries related to TOE. These findings suggest that this AI platform could effectively supplement patient education and complement healthcare professionals' guidance, thereby reducing the workload of echocardiography lab staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01071-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) necessitates meticulous patient preparation. Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, hold promise in delivering medical information. This study sought to assess the suitability of the latest iteration, ChatGPT-4 Omni (GPT-4o), as a supplemental resource for providing information on topics related to TOE.

Methods: Fifty questions pertaining to patient education, covering both fundamental knowledge (25) and management aspects (25) of TOE results, were submitted to GPT-4o in three separate sessions. Three senior echocardiographers systematically evaluated the responses using a four-point scale, focusing on their appropriateness, clarity, and consistency. Additionally, they assessed confabulations and the omission of relevant content on a binary scale.

Results: Overall, 94% of GPT-4o's responses were rated as "highly appropriate" across 50 tasks, with 98% deemed "highly comprehensible". Responses related to basic knowledge were 96% appropriate and 100% comprehensible, while management-related responses were 92% appropriate and 96% comprehensible. In total, two responses (4%) were rated negatively as quite inappropriate. Minor inconsistencies were observed in 12% of regenerated responses, with relevant content missing in 6% of inquiries.

Conclusions: GPT-4o demonstrated high accuracy and reliability in addressing patient inquiries related to TOE. These findings suggest that this AI platform could effectively supplement patient education and complement healthcare professionals' guidance, thereby reducing the workload of echocardiography lab staff.

ChatGPT:经食管超声心动图教育中必不可少的患者伴诊。
目的:经食管超声心动图(TOE)需要精心的病人准备。人工智能(AI)聊天机器人,如ChatGPT,有望提供医疗信息。本研究旨在评估最新版本ChatGPT-4 Omni (gpt - 40)作为提供与TOE相关主题信息的补充资源的适用性。方法:50个关于患者教育的问题,涵盖TOE结果的基础知识(25个)和管理方面(25个),在三个单独的会议中提交给gpt - 40。三名高级超声心动图医师采用四分制对反应进行系统评估,重点关注其适当性、清晰度和一致性。此外,他们还以二值量表评估了虚构和相关内容的遗漏。结果:总体而言,在50个任务中,94%的gpt - 40回答被评为“高度合适”,98%被评为“高度可理解”。与基础知识相关的回答96%合适,100%可理解,而与管理相关的回答92%合适,96%可理解。总共有两个回答(4%)被评价为非常不合适。在12%的回复中观察到轻微的不一致,6%的查询中缺少相关内容。结论:gpt - 40在处理与TOE相关的患者询问方面表现出较高的准确性和可靠性。这些结果表明,该人工智能平台可以有效地补充患者教育,补充医护人员的指导,从而减少超声心动图实验室工作人员的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信