Utilization of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral in the assessment of fluid responsiveness in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock - a systematic review.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Stephin Zachariah Saji, Olivia Murga, Swati Khurana, Bui Hung Phan, Bana Khalil, Amina Mustafa Nagra, Steysi Falcon Aragon, Deekksha Kolagatla, Victor Sebastian Arruarana, Domenica A Herrera, Samer Kottiech, Ernesto Calderón Martínez
{"title":"Utilization of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral in the assessment of fluid responsiveness in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock - a systematic review.","authors":"Stephin Zachariah Saji, Olivia Murga, Swati Khurana, Bui Hung Phan, Bana Khalil, Amina Mustafa Nagra, Steysi Falcon Aragon, Deekksha Kolagatla, Victor Sebastian Arruarana, Domenica A Herrera, Samer Kottiech, Ernesto Calderón Martínez","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01072-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis and septic shock are life-threatening conditions driven by dysregulated host responses to infection, resulting in multi-organ dysfunction. While early fluid resuscitation is essential, both fluid overload and under-resuscitation can worsen outcomes. Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral (LVOT VTI) has emerged as a non-invasive echocardiographic tool to assess fluid responsiveness. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance, cutoff values, and limitations of LVOT VTI as a tool for assessing fluid responsiveness in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL was conducted through April 13, 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251036927). Eligible studies used transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography to measure LVOT VTI and assessed changes following passive leg raise (PLR) or volume expansion tests (VET). Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥ 10-15% increase in VTI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three observational studies including 199 adult patients (20 with sepsis, 179 with septic shock) met inclusion criteria. Two studies used VET (500 mL saline), and one used PLR. Optimal LVOT VTI cutoffs ranged from > 7% to 16%, with sensitivity 78-96%, specificity 91-100%, and AUCs 0.84-0.99. Based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, two studies were rated good quality, and one was fair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LVOT VTI is a reliable, non-invasive parameter for assessing fluid responsiveness in sepsis and septic shock. Despite limited data, this review supports its integration into bedside fluid management protocols to guide individualized resuscitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration id: </strong>CRD420251036927.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01072-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis and septic shock are life-threatening conditions driven by dysregulated host responses to infection, resulting in multi-organ dysfunction. While early fluid resuscitation is essential, both fluid overload and under-resuscitation can worsen outcomes. Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral (LVOT VTI) has emerged as a non-invasive echocardiographic tool to assess fluid responsiveness. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance, cutoff values, and limitations of LVOT VTI as a tool for assessing fluid responsiveness in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL was conducted through April 13, 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251036927). Eligible studies used transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography to measure LVOT VTI and assessed changes following passive leg raise (PLR) or volume expansion tests (VET). Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥ 10-15% increase in VTI.

Results: Three observational studies including 199 adult patients (20 with sepsis, 179 with septic shock) met inclusion criteria. Two studies used VET (500 mL saline), and one used PLR. Optimal LVOT VTI cutoffs ranged from > 7% to 16%, with sensitivity 78-96%, specificity 91-100%, and AUCs 0.84-0.99. Based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, two studies were rated good quality, and one was fair.

Conclusion: LVOT VTI is a reliable, non-invasive parameter for assessing fluid responsiveness in sepsis and septic shock. Despite limited data, this review supports its integration into bedside fluid management protocols to guide individualized resuscitation strategies.

Prospero registration id: CRD420251036927.

利用左心室流出道速度时间积分评估成人脓毒症或感染性休克患者的液体反应性——一项系统综述
背景:脓毒症和脓毒性休克是由宿主对感染反应失调引起的危及生命的疾病,导致多器官功能障碍。虽然早期液体复苏是必不可少的,但液体过载和复苏不足都会使结果恶化。左心室流出道速度时间积分(LVOT VTI)已成为一种非侵入性超声心动图工具来评估液体反应。本系统综述评估LVOT VTI作为脓毒症或感染性休克成年患者液体反应性评估工具的诊断性能、临界值和局限性。方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南(PROSPERO ID: CRD420251036927),在2025年4月13日之前对PubMed、Cochrane、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE和CINAHL进行系统检索。符合条件的研究使用经胸或经食管超声心动图测量LVOT VTI,并评估被动抬腿(PLR)或容积扩张试验(VET)后的变化。液体反应性定义为VTI升高≥10-15%。结果:3项观察性研究包括199例成人患者(20例败血症,179例感染性休克)符合纳入标准。两项研究使用VET (500 mL生理盐水),一项研究使用PLR。最佳LVOT VTI截止值为7% ~ 16%,灵敏度78 ~ 96%,特异性91 ~ 100%,auc 0.84 ~ 0.99。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,两项研究被评为质量良好,一项被评为公平。结论:LVOT VTI是评估脓毒症和感染性休克患者液体反应性的可靠、无创参数。尽管数据有限,但本综述支持将其整合到床边流体管理协议中,以指导个性化复苏策略。普洛斯彼罗注册id: CRD420251036927。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信